Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: Zhejiang, China

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier in the elastic yarn / latex rubber thread related product segment, with listed products including latex rubber thread, double covered elastic, nylon spandex, and related elastic materials. The company presents a relatively solid operational profile, supported by a reported factory area of over 25,000㎡, more than 80 staff, verified supplier status, 8 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, and full customization capability.

Its platform credibility and delivery performance are strong, particularly with a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. However, recent commercial activity is modest, with only 7 orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, and the review base is limited to 5 reviews despite a high 4.9 store rating. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified, customizable elastic material sourcing with moderate order risk, but additional due diligence is recommended before large-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory area: 25,000+㎡
• Employees: 80+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory location: Zhejiang, China

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area exceeding 25,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production footprint. The employee base of more than 80 staff suggests the company has an established operating team, though it does not indicate a very large-scale labor force. The verified supplier status provides additional confidence that the supplier has undergone some form of platform-level verification.

The available data supports the view that the company has a real production base and basic-to-moderate manufacturing capacity. However, there is no additional data provided on annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment details, export markets, major customers, or independent factory audit certifications beyond the stated verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The company’s factory size is relatively strong, and verified supplier status improves confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, the staff count of 80+ positions the supplier closer to a medium-sized manufacturer rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. Since no detailed production capacity or third-party factory certification data is provided, it should not be scored at the highest level. The supplier fits the category of a medium-sized stable factory with a meaningful production site.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 8 years, which indicates a relatively long-standing platform presence. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers using ’s purchasing framework. The verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility.

The supplier also lists several operational and service-related labels, including finished product inspection, warranty availability, ODM service, and full customization. These labels suggest that the supplier has platform-recognized service and quality-related capabilities. However, the provided data does not include specific international certifications, such as ISO, OEKO-TEX, GRS, or other textile-related certifications. Therefore, certification completeness should be assessed based only on the available platform labels.

Scoring Rationale

This supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility due to 8 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple relevant capability tags. These factors provide a robust platform-based compliance and credibility profile. The only limitation is the absence of detailed third-party management system or product certification data, so a perfect score is not justified.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 7
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
• Store rating: 4.9 / 5.0
• Number of reviews: 5

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded 7 orders in the past six months with a transaction value of CN¥67.6K+. This indicates some recent commercial activity, but the order count and transaction amount are relatively limited. The store rating of 4.9 is strong, but the review count is only 5, which reduces the statistical reliability of the rating.

The data shows that the supplier has completed transactions and has received positive customer feedback, but the commercial track record visible on the platform is not yet deep enough to demonstrate high-volume buyer validation. The supplier may be commercially active, but based strictly on the provided data, its recent transaction performance should be considered modest.

Scoring Rationale

The high store rating is a positive indicator, but the low number of orders and limited review base suggest that market validation is still relatively thin. The CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over six months shows actual sales but not high transaction intensity. Therefore, the supplier should be scored in the lower-middle range for business performance rather than as a high-performing platform seller.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Full customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier lists a response time of no more than 5 hours, which is acceptable for international B2B communication but does not reach the highest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. The availability of full customization and ODM service suggests that the supplier can support customized buyer requirements rather than only offering standard catalog products.

The provided product listings also show low minimum order quantities, such as 1 kilogram or 3 kilograms, which may support flexible sampling or small-batch purchasing. However, no detailed information is available regarding engineering support, sample lead time, dedicated account management, multilingual support, or after-sales process.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability because it supports full customization and ODM service, and the response time is within a reasonable business window. However, since the response time is ≤5h rather than ≤1h, and deeper service process data is unavailable, the supplier should not receive a top-tier service score.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the strongest delivery-related indicator in the provided data. This suggests that, for recorded platform orders, the supplier has successfully dispatched goods within the agreed timeframe.

However, the delivery performance should be interpreted together with the business performance data. Since the supplier only recorded 7 orders in the past six months, the 100.0% rate is positive but based on a relatively small visible order sample.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9 to 10 points. A 100.0% rate supports a full score. Although the number of recent orders is limited, the delivery metric itself is clearly excellent based on the provided data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9 / 5.0
• Number of reviews: 5
• Finished product inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s store rating of 4.9 is strong and indicates positive customer satisfaction from available feedback. The presence of finished product inspection is an important quality assurance indicator, suggesting that goods may be checked before shipment. Warranty availability also adds a degree of buyer protection. Verified supplier status further supports credibility in the supplier’s quality profile.

However, the review count is only 5, which means the rating is based on a small customer feedback sample. The data does not include defect rates, return rates, product test reports, quality certifications, inspection standards, or third-party audit documentation. Therefore, the quality assessment should remain positive but cautious.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several positive quality indicators: high rating, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These support a good quality score. However, the limited review count prevents the supplier from being rated as having extensive customer-proven quality performance. The score reflects good platform-visible quality controls but limited feedback depth.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended for Cooperation

Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking elastic yarn, latex rubber thread, nylon spandex, double covered elastic, or related elastic material products from a verified China-based supplier with customization capability. The supplier is especially suitable for buyers who value platform protection, Trade Assurance, finished product inspection, and flexible MOQ options.

Suitable Customer Types:
- Small to medium-sized buyers requiring flexible MOQ procurement
- Buyers seeking ODM or full customization support
- Buyers prioritizing Trade Assurance and verified supplier status
- Importers or manufacturers sourcing elastic material inputs with moderate order volumes

Main Risk Points:
- Recent platform transaction volume is limited: 7 orders in 6 months
- Transaction value is modest: CN¥67.6K+ in 6 months
- Customer review base is small: 5 reviews
- No detailed third-party product certifications or factory audit certificates are provided in the data
- No production capacity, equipment list, lead time, or major customer data is available — Insufficient Data

Growth Potential:
The supplier has a solid platform foundation, long Gold Supplier history, verified status, full customization capability, finished product inspection, and excellent on-time dispatch performance. If the supplier can expand transaction volume, accumulate more buyer reviews, and provide stronger certification or audit documentation, its procurement attractiveness would improve further, especially for larger-volume international buyers.