zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangdong Yiweixian Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangdong Yiweixian Food Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 16,000+ sqm and 90+ staff. The company appears to have a moderate manufacturing base and is listed as a verified supplier, supported by Gold Supplier status for 4 years and Trade Assurance. Its product listings focus on dried seasoning, soup powder, ginger garlic powder, and related boxed or carton-packed food products, with MOQs mainly ranging from 600 to 1,000 cartons.

The supplier shows acceptable platform credibility and delivery reliability, especially with a reported 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. However, its commercial performance data is limited, with only 3 orders and CN¥4.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a store rating of 4.0 based on only 1 review. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium trial procurement, customized dried seasoning products, or initial supplier development, but larger buyers should conduct additional quality, compliance, and production verification before scaling cooperation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 16,000+ sqm, 90+ staff, and verified supplier status. The company is located in Guangdong, China.

Elaboration:
A 16,000+ sqm facility indicates a meaningful production footprint, and 90+ staff suggests the company has more than a very small workshop-level operation. The available data supports the view that the supplier has basic to moderate production capacity. However, the provided information does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, equipment lists, export volume, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier is stronger than a small-scale or information-poor factory because it provides factory size, staffing, and verification status. However, the employee count remains moderate rather than large, and the absence of detailed production capacity data prevents it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. Therefore, the score fits the middle-stable factory range.

Final Score: 15/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is an Gold Supplier for 4 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Listed platform tags include “Warranty available,” “ODM service available,” “Full customization,” and “Minor customization.”

Elaboration:
The combination of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification provides a reasonable level of platform-backed credibility. A 4-year Gold Supplier history indicates some continuity on the platform, though it is not long enough to be considered highly mature by itself. The available certification or industry label information is platform-oriented and service-oriented; no independent food safety certifications, factory audit certificates, or product compliance certificates were provided.

Scoring Rationale:
Core platform credibility elements are present: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. This supports a score in the credible and operationally established range. However, the absence of detailed third-party compliance certificates or food-sector certifications limits the ability to assign a top-tier score.

Final Score: 16/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
Over the past six months, the supplier recorded 3 orders and CN¥4.7K+ in transaction value. The store rating is 4.0, based on 1 review.

Elaboration:
The commercial record available from the platform is limited. Three orders over six months and CN¥4.7K+ transaction value indicate low transaction activity. The store rating of 4.0 is acceptable but is supported by only one review, making the reliability of the feedback statistically weak. There is insufficient evidence of consistent order flow, strong buyer activity, or high transaction volume.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has some transaction history, so it is not completely unverified commercially. However, order count, transaction value, and review volume are all low. The 4.0 rating provides some positive signal, but with only one review, the business performance cannot be considered strongly validated.

Final Score: 10/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The reported response time is ≤3h. Platform tags include “Full customization,” “Minor customization,” and “ODM service available.”

Elaboration:
A response time within three hours indicates reasonable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. The presence of full customization, minor customization, and ODM service tags suggests the supplier offers flexible service options for buyers requiring product or packaging adaptation. No additional data was provided regarding dedicated sales teams, language capability, sample lead time, or after-sales workflow.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates a service capability above the basic level due to customization and ODM support. The response speed is acceptable but not top-tier. Because the response time exceeds the strongest ≤1h benchmark and supporting service details are limited, the score is placed in the normal-to-good service range.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate.

Elaboration:
A 100.0% on-time dispatch rate is a strong delivery indicator based on the provided data. It suggests that recorded orders have been shipped within expected timeframes. However, this metric should be interpreted alongside the low recent order volume, as only 3 orders were recorded in the past six months.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. The supplier’s 100.0% rate supports a high score. The score is not reduced significantly, but the limited order base should still be noted as a risk when assessing repeatability at larger scale.

Final Score: 9/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The store rating is 4.0, based on 1 review. The supplier is marked as a verified supplier. Finished Product Inspection information was not provided. Factory Verification is indicated through verified supplier status.

Elaboration:
The supplier has limited customer feedback. A 4.0 rating is acceptable, but one review is insufficient to establish a reliable quality reputation. Verified supplier status provides some platform-level confidence, but no explicit Finished Product Inspection data was provided. No independent quality certifications, food safety standards, test reports, or inspection records were included in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has basic quality credibility through verification and a non-negative rating, but the quality evidence is thin. The very low review count and lack of Finished Product Inspection information prevent a higher score. The score reflects limited but not absent quality validation.

Final Score: 11/20

Total Score

Company Strength: 15/20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16/20
Business Performance: 10/20
Service Capability: 8/10
Delivery Performance: 9/10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 11/20

Total Score: 69/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for trial orders, small-to-medium procurement, or buyers seeking customizable dried seasoning and related powder products. The supplier has a moderate factory base, platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, customization capability, and strong reported delivery performance.

However, it is not yet strongly validated for large-scale or high-risk procurement based on the available data. Main risks include low recent order volume, low transaction value, only one customer review, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, independent food safety certifications, production capacity, and detailed quality control systems.

Recommended buyer type: importers, distributors, private-label buyers, or food product buyers conducting initial supplier screening or pilot purchasing. For larger orders, buyers should request product specifications, compliance documents, inspection records, sample testing, factory audit details, and quality assurance procedures before committing to bulk procurement. The supplier shows growth potential if it can increase transaction volume, accumulate more verified reviews, and provide stronger quality and compliance documentation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zonegoing Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zonegoing Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baishi Brothers Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baishi Brothers Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yusheng Food Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yusheng Food Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Hotest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Hotest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningxia Hongshanhe Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningxia Hongshanhe Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jiaduohao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jiaduohao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amos Food (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amos Food (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinjie Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinjie Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anran Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anran Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lishui Mingyuan Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lishui Mingyuan Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinghua Lianfu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinghua Lianfu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Gaishi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Gaishi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhixi (Shanghai) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhixi (Shanghai) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jianxinsheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jianxinsheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Fuyuan Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fuyuan Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Duocai Tent Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Duocai Tent Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Focus Digital Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Focus Digital Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Jincang Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Jincang Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xingdou Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xingdou Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinsu Outdoor Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinsu Outdoor Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fuyue Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fuyue Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan City Nanhai District Songgang Suifa Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan City Nanhai District Songgang Suifa Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ceng Ceng Gao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ceng Ceng Gao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Langri Heating And Cooling Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Langri Heating And Cooling Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Keshuosi Robot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Keshuosi Robot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Bolin Metal Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Bolin Metal Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yanshuoda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yanshuoda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ijoe Fashion And Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ijoe Fashion And Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Qitenda Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Qitenda Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhibiao Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhibiao Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Yize Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Yize Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026