zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangdong Zonegoing Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangdong Zonegoing Food Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 15,000+㎡ and 80+ staff. The company is marked as a verified supplier and operates as a 4-year Gold Supplier with Trade Assurance support. Its listed product range includes bubble tea-related supplies, customized flavors, milk tea supplies, and fruit-based products such as grapefruit and mango items. From a procurement perspective, the supplier shows a medium-scale operating profile with credible platform backing, basic customization capabilities, finished product inspection, and strong recorded delivery performance. However, commercial validation remains relatively limited, with only 20+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, plus only 2 customer reviews despite a 5.0 store rating. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking medium-scale sourcing, customized beverage or food ingredient supplies, and suppliers with platform-level transaction protection. Large-volume strategic buyers should conduct further due diligence before committing to major long-term contracts.

Guangdong Zonegoing Food Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Guangdong Zonegoing Food Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 15,000+㎡
  • Employees: 80+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of more than 15,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical operating base rather than a very small workshop-style setup. The staff size of 80+ employees suggests a medium-sized organization with basic operational, production, and support functions. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s existence and operating profile.

However, the available data does not provide detailed production line numbers, annual production capacity, machinery information, warehouse capacity, food safety certifications, or third-party audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have a stable medium-scale base, the data is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale or highly industrialized supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates stronger-than-basic production infrastructure through its 15,000+㎡ factory area and 80+ staff, and the verified supplier status supports its credibility. However, the employee scale remains moderate, and there is insufficient data on actual production capacity, equipment, or formal factory certifications beyond verification. This places the supplier in the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. A 4-year Gold Supplier history shows that the company is not newly established on the platform and has maintained its supplier status for multiple years. Trade Assurance support is a positive procurement safeguard because it provides a platform-backed mechanism for transaction protection. The verified supplier status further strengthens platform-level trust.

The listed capability and compliance-related tags include finished product inspection and customization services. However, the data does not mention internationally recognized food safety certifications, factory audit certificates, export licenses, or specific compliance standards. Therefore, the compliance profile is credible at the platform level but not fully proven from a broader certification perspective.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility package: Gold Supplier status, 4-year history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and relevant operational tags. The 4-year duration is solid but not exceptionally long, and the absence of detailed third-party compliance certificates prevents a higher score. Overall, the supplier fits the upper range of suppliers with core platform credentials in place.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 20+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders and over CN¥202.8K in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates active trading activity, but the volume is not high enough to demonstrate large-scale or high-frequency market validation. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count is only 2, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator.

From a procurement evaluation standpoint, the business performance data shows that the supplier has real transaction records and some buyer acceptance. However, the limited order count and very small review base mean that commercial validation is still relatively thin. There is insufficient data on repeat purchase rate, major customers, export markets, or order fulfillment volume by product category.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has measurable recent transactions and a perfect rating, but the low number of reviews and moderate six-month order volume restrict confidence in broad market acceptance. The transaction amount of CN¥202.8K+ shows business activity but does not indicate a high-volume supplier. Therefore, the supplier is assessed as having lower-to-moderate business validation rather than strong commercial performance.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Full customization: Listed
  • ODM service available: Listed
  • Minor customization: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier shows acceptable communication responsiveness with a response time of within three hours. This is suitable for regular procurement communication, quotation follow-up, and order clarification. The platform labels also indicate that the supplier supports full customization, ODM service, and minor customization, which suggests flexibility for buyers requiring tailored product specifications or flavor-related adjustments.

However, the response time is not within one hour, so it does not qualify as top-tier responsiveness under the scoring criteria. In addition, while customization capabilities are listed, the provided data does not include examples of customized projects, design support scope, R&D capability, sampling lead time, or technical service team structure. Therefore, the service capability is positive but cannot be rated at the maximum level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier combines reasonable response speed with multiple customization-related service labels. This supports a strong service profile for buyers with customized beverage or food supply needs. However, the ≤3h response time is good rather than excellent, and the depth of customization capability is not fully evidenced by project-level data. This supports a score in the upper part of the normal service capability range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The reported on-time shipment rate is 100.0%, which is a strong indicator of delivery discipline within the available platform data. For procurement teams, this suggests that the supplier has been able to meet shipment commitments in recorded transactions. Delivery reliability is especially important for food, beverage supplies, and replenishment-based purchasing, where delays may affect downstream sales or production schedules.

However, the data does not provide the number of shipments behind the on-time shipment rate, shipment destinations, average lead time, logistics method, or seasonal performance. Therefore, while the percentage is excellent, the depth of delivery validation is limited by the available dataset.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it meets the highest delivery performance bracket. Although shipment volume details are not provided, the available metric itself supports a maximum delivery score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 2
  • Finished product inspection: Listed
  • Verified supplier: True
  • On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive, and the presence of a finished product inspection label indicates that some level of outgoing quality control is available. Verified supplier status also contributes to the supplier’s basic quality credibility from a platform verification perspective.

However, the number of reviews is only 2, which is too limited to provide a statistically strong view of customer satisfaction. The data does not include defect rates, complaint records, inspection reports, food safety certifications, laboratory testing, traceability systems, or quality management certifications. As a result, while the quality indicators are favorable, the evidence base is not deep enough to classify the supplier as having a fully proven quality system.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a perfect rating and a listed finished product inspection capability, both of which support a positive quality assessment. The verified supplier status further improves confidence. Nevertheless, the extremely limited review count weakens the reliability of customer feedback, and there is insufficient data on formal quality certifications or detailed inspection procedures. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” level rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 17 / 20
Business Performance 13 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended

Guangdong Zonegoing Food Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a medium-scale supplier for bubble tea supplies, customized flavors, milk tea-related products, and listed fruit-based products. The supplier is especially appropriate for small to medium procurement programs where Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, customization support, and reliable recorded delivery performance are important.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium beverage brands
- Bubble tea supply distributors
- Buyers requiring customization or ODM service
- Importers seeking platform-protected transactions
- Customers testing new suppliers through controlled trial orders

Main risks:
- Limited customer review base: only 2 reviews
- Moderate recent transaction scale: 20+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ in six months
- Insufficient data on food safety certifications, production capacity, inspection reports, and export compliance
- Quality system depth cannot be fully confirmed from the provided data

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good development potential due to its 15,000+㎡ factory area, 80+ staff, 4-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, customization labels, finished product inspection, and 100.0% on-time shipment rate. If future data confirms stronger transaction volume, more customer reviews, and formal quality or food safety certifications, the supplier’s procurement attractiveness could increase significantly.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yiweixian Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yiweixian Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baishi Brothers Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baishi Brothers Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yusheng Food Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yusheng Food Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Hotest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Hotest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningxia Hongshanhe Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningxia Hongshanhe Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jiaduohao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jiaduohao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amos Food (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amos Food (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinjie Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinjie Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anran Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anran Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lishui Mingyuan Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lishui Mingyuan Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinghua Lianfu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinghua Lianfu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Gaishi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Gaishi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhixi (Shanghai) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhixi (Shanghai) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Puhuasheng Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Puhuasheng Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhejiang Ziri Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ziri Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Xiangliyuan Steel Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Xiangliyuan Steel Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Dingxin Films Technology Stock Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Dingxin Films Technology Stock Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Kangyuan Rubber And Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Kangyuan Rubber And Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Lucky Bridge Polishing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Lucky Bridge Polishing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Ruize Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Ruize Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Interwell Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Interwell Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiborui (Xianghe) Electronic Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiborui (Xianghe) Electronic Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinheng Integrated House Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinheng Integrated House Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kende Mechanical &Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kende Mechanical &Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhibiao Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhibiao Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi 'An Internet Cube Sunshade Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi 'An Internet Cube Sunshade Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Shihao Sealing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Shihao Sealing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Changle Xinhongyuan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Changle Xinhongyuan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Nanxiang Air Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Nanxiang Air Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Solar Up Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Solar Up Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Evermore International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Evermore International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gaojie Model Design And Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gaojie Model Design And Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026