zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, operating in nylon yarn-related products such as Nylon 20D 1F Round Bright PA, Nylon 6 High Tenacity 30D, Nylon Mother Yarn, and Semi Dull nylon yarn specifications. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but operationally verified supplier, with a factory area of over 1,400㎡ and more than 10 staff. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and delivery reliability: it has 10 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and reports a 96.6% on-time delivery rate. However, business validation remains moderate, with 50+ orders and CN¥40.5K+ transaction value over the past six months, a 4.3 store rating, and only 10 reviews. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ nylon yarn sourcing, sample-based procurement, or controlled trial orders, but larger-volume buyers should further verify production capacity and quality control systems.

Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Jiangsu, China
  • Factory area: 1,400+㎡
  • Employees: 10+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory presence with a stated area of over 1,400㎡ and more than 10 staff. This indicates that the company has basic production or operational capacity, but the scale is relatively small compared with larger industrial textile or yarn manufacturers. The presence of supplier verification improves confidence that the company has passed at least a basic platform-level verification process.

However, the available data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment details, factory certifications, or audit reports beyond the “verified supplier” status. Therefore, while the company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability, there is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large-scale or highly industrialized supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee count suggest a small-scale operation rather than a large or medium-sized manufacturer. The supplier verification status provides a positive credibility factor, but the absence of detailed production capacity, equipment information, and factory certification limits the score. The company fits the category of a smaller supplier with basic production capability.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verification status: Verified supplier
  • Platform/industry tags: “Response time ≤6h”, “On-time delivery 96.6%”

Elaboration

The supplier has strong platform credibility indicators. A 10-year Gold Supplier history is a significant positive signal, showing long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support also provides buyers with additional transaction protection. The supplier is marked as verified, which strengthens baseline confidence in its business legitimacy.

The platform tags indicate measurable performance in response time and delivery. However, no additional compliance certifications, industry-specific certifications, or quality management certifications are provided in the data. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but broader compliance documentation remains insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in this dimension due to long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. These factors represent a relatively complete platform trust framework. The score is not full because there is no provided evidence of additional certification systems beyond platform verification and performance tags.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 50+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥40.5K+
  • Store rating: 4.3
  • Number of reviews: 10

Elaboration

The supplier has generated more than 50 orders over the past six months, indicating active commercial activity on the platform. However, the transaction value of CN¥40.5K+ is relatively modest, suggesting that order sizes may be small or that the supplier is mainly serving lower-volume buyers.

The store rating of 4.3 is acceptable but not exceptionally high. The review count of 10 is limited, which weakens the statistical reliability of the customer feedback profile. Overall, the supplier has demonstrated marketplace activity, but the depth of commercial validation is not yet strong enough to indicate high-volume or highly mature business performance.

Scoring Rationale

The order count shows some market traction, but the transaction value and review base remain limited. The 4.3 rating is moderate and does not strongly support a premium performance assessment. This places the supplier in the lower-to-mid business validation range rather than the high-performance category.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤6h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 6 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing inquiries. This is a positive service indicator, especially for buyers needing basic quotation, sample, or order communication.

However, there is no provided information confirming whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private labeling, technical customization, packaging customization, or specification-based development beyond the listed products. Therefore, the service capability can only be evaluated on response speed, not on customization depth.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable but not within the highest-performance level of ≤1 hour. Since no customization capability is confirmed, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service flexibility. The score reflects adequate communication responsiveness but limited evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 96.6%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 96.6% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the top scoring range.

This level of delivery reliability is particularly important for textile and yarn procurement, where production planning and inventory scheduling depend on predictable shipment timing. Based strictly on the provided data, delivery performance is one of the supplier’s strongest measurable advantages.

Scoring Rationale

With an on-time delivery rate significantly above 90%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability. Since the provided data does not include dispute rates, average lead time, or late-shipment causes, the score is based solely on the reported on-time delivery performance.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.3
  • Number of reviews: 10
  • Verified supplier / Factory Verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.3, which indicates generally acceptable customer satisfaction, but it is not at a high-premium level. The review count is only 10, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad quality indicator. A small review base means the buyer should be cautious when using customer feedback as the main quality reference.

The supplier verification status supports basic confidence in business and factory legitimacy. However, the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, third-party inspection processes, quality management certifications, defect control systems, or testing standards. As a result, the quality assurance framework cannot be considered fully transparent based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some positive quality indicators, including a verified status and acceptable rating, but the limited number of reviews and absence of confirmed finished product inspection reduce confidence. The score reflects partial quality validation rather than a mature or fully documented quality assurance system.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 13 / 20
Service Capability 6 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 12 / 20
Total Score 71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation / Trial Order Recommended

Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking nylon yarn products with low minimum order quantities, sample testing, or small-to-medium procurement volumes. The supplier’s key strengths are its 10-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and strong 96.6% on-time delivery rate.

However, buyers should manage several risks before scaling up procurement. The company’s factory area and staff size indicate a relatively small operation, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, equipment, quality certifications, Finished Product Inspection, and customization capability. Business performance is active but moderate, with CN¥40.5K+ transaction value and only 10 reviews over the available period.

For procurement teams, the recommended approach is to start with sample orders or limited-volume trial purchases, verify product specifications, request quality inspection records where available, and confirm production capacity before placing large or recurring orders. The supplier has growth potential if it can provide stronger quality documentation, more customer feedback, and clearer production capability data.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Nantong Josson New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Josson New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Symer New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Symer New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Mino New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Mino New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hiwonder Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hiwonder Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Biobase Biotech (Jinan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Biobase Biotech (Jinan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Onegol Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Onegol Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Huotian Dayou Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Huotian Dayou Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Clean Pco Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Clean Pco Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuyi Robust Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuyi Robust Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Eiffel Mould & Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Eiffel Mould & Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Helida Grain Selecting Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Helida Grain Selecting Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kindom Opto-Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kindom Opto-Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aomi Water Purification System Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aomi Water Purification System Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Boman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Boman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Forever Plastics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Forever Plastics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Yilai Light Industry Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Yilai Light Industry Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Taozhou New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Taozhou New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tonglida Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tonglida Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Boyue Alloy Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Boyue Alloy Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Great Bear Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Great Bear Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ruikexin Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ruikexin Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Loven Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Loven Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026