Jiangsu Boyue Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Jiangsu Boyue Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. is a China-based chemical fiber supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of over 11,000㎡ and more than 60 staff. The company offers polyester and spandex-related yarn products, including air-covered yarn and cationic polyester yarn, with MOQ levels mainly between 500 and 1,000 kilograms. Its platform profile shows relatively strong credibility indicators, including 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, supplier/factory verification, and customization-related service labels. Business activity appears moderate to solid, with 30+ orders and CN¥5M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the public customer feedback base is limited, with only 2 reviews despite a 5.0 store rating. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale yarn sourcing, customization support, and platform-backed transaction protection, while buyers requiring extensive third-party quality evidence should conduct further due diligence.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength — 20 Points
Basis
- Company name: Jiangsu Boyue Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.
- Country/region: China, Jiangsu Province
- Factory area: 11,000+㎡
- Employees: 60+ staff
- Verified/audited supplier status: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with more than 11,000㎡ of factory space and over 60 employees. This indicates that the company is not a very small trading-only operation based on the provided data, and it appears to have a certain level of production infrastructure. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of an inspected or validated business profile.
However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, annual output, number of production lines, machinery list, warehouse capacity, or export volume. Therefore, while the factory size and workforce suggest a stable mid-sized manufacturing operation, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate manufacturing strength through its factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. A factory size above 11,000㎡ is meaningful for yarn-related production, and 60+ staff indicates operational capability. However, the absence of production capacity and equipment data prevents a higher score. Based on the criteria, this aligns best with a medium stable factory rather than a large-scale supplier.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier/factory status: True
- Platform/industry tags: ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization, Response time ≤3h
Elaboration
The supplier has several important credibility indicators. A 7-year Gold Supplier history suggests a relatively established platform presence. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with a platform-backed transaction mechanism. The verified supplier status adds another credibility layer, indicating that some level of supplier or factory validation has been completed.
The platform labels also show service capability, including ODM service and customization options. However, the provided data does not include detailed third-party management system certifications, such as ISO, OEKO-TEX, GRS, or other textile-related certifications. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, broader compliance documentation is not fully evidenced in the available dataset.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile due to 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These factors provide meaningful buyer protection and reduce sourcing risk. The lack of additional compliance certificates limits the score from reaching the absolute top range, but the credibility structure is relatively complete.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance — 20 Points
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 30+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥5M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2
Elaboration
The supplier has achieved more than 30 orders and over CN¥5M in transaction value within the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance and suggests that the supplier has generated meaningful transaction volume on the platform. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review base is very small, with only 2 reviews available.
The gap between transaction amount and review count should be considered carefully. The transaction value indicates business activity, but the low number of reviews limits the reliability of customer satisfaction evidence. As a result, the supplier demonstrates real commercial traction but not yet a broad visible customer feedback base.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable mid-level business performance. The CN¥5M+ transaction value is a strong point, and 30+ orders over six months indicates regular platform activity. However, the limited review count weakens the statistical reliability of the 5.0 rating. Therefore, the supplier should not be rated at the highest performance level, but its transaction data supports an above-average score.
Final Score
16 / 20
4. Service Capability — 10 Points
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Platform labels: Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available
Elaboration
The supplier shows clear customization capability based on the provided platform labels. Full customization, minor customization, and ODM service availability suggest that the supplier can support different levels of product adaptation. This is relevant for buyers sourcing yarn products with specific specifications, colors, or functional requirements, provided such requirements fall within the supplier’s confirmed product scope.
The response time is listed as ≤3 hours. This is acceptable and indicates relatively efficient communication, though it does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. No additional data is provided regarding multilingual support, dedicated account managers, technical documentation speed, sample lead time, or after-sales service.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has strong customization-related labels and acceptable response speed. Because the response time is not within the top ≤1 hour level, the score should not enter the 9–10 range. However, the combination of ODM and full customization supports a solid service capability rating.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 83.3%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 83.3%, which falls within the 80–89% range. This indicates that the supplier has a moderate delivery reliability level but still has room for improvement. For buyers with strict production schedules or seasonal delivery windows, this rate should be monitored carefully.
No further data is provided regarding average lead time, sample lead time, logistics methods, historical delay causes, or peak-season delivery performance. Therefore, the assessment is based only on the stated on-time delivery percentage.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since 83.3% is in the lower-middle part of this range, the supplier earns a moderate delivery score rather than a high one.
Final Score
7.5 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2
- Verified supplier/factory status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: indicated as verified supplier/factory status = True
Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive. However, the rating is based on only 2 reviews, making the customer feedback sample too limited for a strong quality conclusion. The verified supplier/factory status provides some quality-related confidence because it indicates a degree of business or factory validation.
However, the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection capability, quality control workflow, testing equipment, defect rate, inspection reports, or textile-specific quality certifications. Therefore, the quality assessment must remain cautious. The available data supports basic quality credibility, but not a fully proven quality assurance system.
Scoring Rationale
The 5.0 rating is favorable, and verified supplier/factory status improves confidence. Nevertheless, only 2 reviews are insufficient to demonstrate broad customer satisfaction, and Finished Product Inspection information is not provided. This places the supplier in the “good but limited evidence” category rather than the top quality tier.
Final Score
14 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 15 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 18 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 16 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 7.5 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 14 / 20 |
| Total Score | 78.5 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.
Jiangsu Boyue Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking polyester/spandex yarn products from a mid-sized Chinese supplier with platform credibility, Trade Assurance protection, customization support, and moderate recent transaction performance. The supplier is especially suitable for buyers with medium-volume procurement needs, such as textile manufacturers, fabric producers, or sourcing teams requiring MOQ levels around 500–1,000 kilograms.
Key risks include the limited number of customer reviews, incomplete disclosed quality inspection information, and a moderate on-time delivery rate of 83.3%. Before placing large or time-sensitive orders, buyers should request product samples, confirm technical specifications, clarify quality inspection procedures, and agree on delivery milestones.
The supplier shows growth potential due to its 7-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥5M+ recent transaction value, verified supplier status, and customization capability. However, further quality documentation is needed before it can be considered a low-risk strategic supplier.
Leave your comment