Liaoning Chita Chemical Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

LIAONING CHITA CHEMICAL CO LTD is a China-based supplier located in Liaoning, offering wax-related products including fully refined paraffin wax, microcrystalline wax, ceresine wax, and candle-making wax, with listed MOQs generally at 20 tons. The company shows credible platform standing, including 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, and ODM service availability. Its operational scale appears relatively small to lower-mid sized, with a reported factory area of 1,500+㎡ and 40+ staff. Commercial performance is limited, with only 5 orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, while store rating data is unavailable and customer reviews are 0. Delivery performance is a notable concern, with a 75.0% on-time shipment rate. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking wax products with platform-backed transaction protection, but it requires careful order monitoring and quality/delivery verification before larger commitments.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 pts

Basis

• Company name: LIAONING CHITA CHEMICAL CO LTD
• Location: Liaoning, China
• Factory area: 1,500+㎡
• Employees: 40+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Product scope shown: paraffin wax, microcrystalline wax, ceresine wax, candle-making wax
• MOQ for listed products: 20 tons

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical operating base with a reported factory area of over 1,500㎡ and more than 40 employees. This indicates the presence of basic production or supply-handling capability, but the provided scale does not support classification as a large-scale manufacturing operation. The 20-ton MOQ across listed wax products suggests the company is positioned for bulk industrial or wholesale orders rather than small retail-level procurement.

The “verified supplier” status strengthens confidence that the company has undergone some level of supplier verification. However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, annual output, number of production lines, equipment list, warehouse capacity, or factory certification details. Therefore, its production strength can be recognized as operationally valid but not proven to be large-scale.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic to moderate factory strength through its verified status, 1,500+㎡ facility, and 40+ staff. However, the size is not large, and no detailed production capacity or factory certification beyond verification is provided. This places the supplier above a weak or purely trading profile, but below a medium-to-large stable manufacturing base.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 pts

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier tenure: 12 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier status: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Finished Product Inspection
• ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong platform credibility. A 12-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, which is an important credibility factor in cross-border procurement. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with an added transaction protection mechanism on the platform. The verified supplier status further improves trustworthiness compared with unverified suppliers.

The available certification and service labels are also relevant. Finished Product Inspection is directly related to quality control, while ODM service availability indicates some level of customization or product development support. However, the provided data does not include internationally recognized certifications such as ISO, REACH, SGS, or other chemical-sector compliance documents. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but broader compliance documentation remains insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets most key platform credibility indicators: long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verified status, and quality/service-related labels. The main limitation is the absence of detailed third-party compliance certificates or industry-specific chemical certifications in the provided data. Still, within the platform context, its credibility profile is highly established.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 pts

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 5
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded recent transaction activity, but the scale is limited. Five orders over six months indicates relatively low order volume, and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value suggests some commercial activity but not a high-volume sales profile. For bulk wax products with 20-ton MOQs, the transaction value confirms actual business movement, but the order count remains modest.

A major limitation is the lack of customer feedback data. The store rating is not provided, and the review count is 0. This means buyer satisfaction, complaint history, repeat order evidence, and post-delivery service experience cannot be evaluated based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has verifiable recent transactions, so it should not be rated as commercially inactive. However, low order volume, modest transaction value, missing store rating, and zero reviews materially reduce the strength of commercial validation. The business performance is therefore considered limited and only partially proven.

Final Score

10 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 pts

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• ODM service available: Yes, based on platform label
• Low MOQ for customization: Yes, based on platform label
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours is acceptable for international sourcing communication. It does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour, but it still suggests reasonable communication efficiency.

The platform labels indicate ODM service availability and low MOQ for customization. This suggests the supplier may support some level of customization or product adaptation. However, the provided data does not confirm “Full Customization,” nor does it provide examples of customized products, R&D capability, packaging customization, formulation adjustment, or private-label service. Therefore, service capability is present but cannot be classified as highly advanced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has acceptable response speed and some customization-related service labels. However, without confirmed Full Customization capability and with response time slower than the highest service tier, the service score should remain in the normal-to-good range rather than the top range.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 pts

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 75.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipment rate is 75.0%, which falls within the 70%–79% range. This indicates that delivery reliability exists but is not strong. For bulk chemical or wax-related procurement, shipment punctuality is important because delays may affect downstream production schedules, inventory planning, and logistics coordination.

A 75.0% on-time shipment rate means one in four shipments may potentially face delay based on the provided performance metric. This does not disqualify the supplier, but it creates a clear operational risk that buyers should manage through confirmed lead times, written delivery commitments, and staged procurement.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, a 70%–79% on-time shipment rate corresponds to 5–6 points. Since 75.0% is in the middle of this range but still significantly below 80%, the supplier receives a conservative score.

Final Score

5 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 pts

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Yes, based on platform label
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Product categories listed: paraffin wax, microcrystalline wax, ceresine wax, candle-making wax

Elaboration

The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, particularly Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. These are positive signals because they suggest the supplier has at least basic inspection and verification mechanisms in place.

However, the customer feedback side is weak. No store rating is provided, and the review count is 0. As a result, there is no buyer-side evidence regarding product consistency, specification compliance, packaging quality, dispute handling, or after-sales responsiveness. For chemical and wax procurement, quality consistency is especially important, but the provided data does not include test reports, product specifications, COA, MSDS, batch consistency records, or third-party inspection certificates.

Scoring Rationale

The score reflects a mixed profile: formal quality-related platform labels are present, but customer feedback evidence is absent. Finished Product Inspection and verification prevent the score from falling into the lowest range, but the lack of reviews, rating, and detailed quality documentation limits confidence.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

LIAONING CHITA CHEMICAL CO LTD can be considered for cooperation, particularly for buyers sourcing bulk wax products such as paraffin wax, microcrystalline wax, ceresine wax, or candle-making wax at around 20-ton MOQ levels. The supplier’s strongest advantages are its 12-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection label, and ODM service availability.

However, buyers should proceed cautiously. The main risks are the low recent order volume, missing store rating, zero customer reviews, and a 75.0% on-time shipment rate. These factors indicate that commercial validation and delivery reliability are not yet strong.

Recommended procurement approach: - Start with a trial order or controlled-volume order. - Use Trade Assurance where possible. - Confirm product specifications, COA/MSDS, inspection requirements, and delivery schedule before payment. - Require pre-shipment inspection or Finished Product Inspection evidence. - Monitor delivery performance before scaling order volume.

Best suited for: buyers who prioritize platform-backed transaction protection and bulk wax sourcing, and who can manage supplier qualification through samples, inspections, and staged purchasing.

Growth potential: moderate, mainly supported by long platform history and verification status, but improvement is needed in customer feedback, order volume, and delivery reliability.