Yida Hehao (Hebei) Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yida Hehao (Hebei) Chemical Co., Ltd. is a China-based chemical supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of over 20,000 m2 and more than 110 staff. The company offers chemical and material-related products including high-strength PP fiber for concrete, tartaric acid, SLES 70, cosmetic and detergent raw materials, and sodium olefin products. Its profile shows Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and platform labels such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, minor customization, and warranty availability. Business activity is moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is 5.0, but the review base is limited at 4 reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified mid-scale Chinese chemical suppliers with low MOQ options, fast response, and strong delivery performance, while larger buyers should further verify quality consistency, production documentation, and export compliance before bulk procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Hebei, China
- Factory area: 20,000+ m2
- Employees: 110+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a factory size exceeding 20,000 m2 and a workforce of more than 110 employees. This indicates a meaningful operating base rather than a very small trading entity. The verified supplier status provides additional credibility that the business and operating information has been checked at platform level. However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment details, or factory audit reports beyond the verification status.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates characteristics of a mid-sized and relatively stable factory, supported by a sizable facility, over 100 staff, and supplier verification. These factors suggest that it has basic-to-solid production and supply capacity. However, because the data does not provide detailed production scale, output volume, or specific factory certification information, it does not fully meet the threshold for a top-tier large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score: 16/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has core credibility features, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. Trade Assurance is important for procurement risk control because it provides platform-supported transaction protection. The listed platform labels also indicate some service and quality-related capabilities, including Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. However, the Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years, and no external certifications such as ISO, REACH, or other chemical-related compliance certifications are provided in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a solid platform compliance foundation with verified status, Trade Assurance, and relevant profile labels. These elements support transaction credibility and reduce basic procurement risk. The score is moderated because the Gold Supplier tenure is only 2 years and the data does not include independent factory audit certificates or chemical industry compliance certifications.

Final Score: 16/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 4

Elaboration:
The supplier has demonstrated recent commercial activity, with more than 20 orders and over CN¥135.2K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the store is active and has completed transactions through the platform. The 5.0 rating is positive, but the number of reviews is only 4, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The available transaction volume appears moderate rather than high.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has measurable business activity and a perfect store rating, which supports confidence in recent buyer satisfaction. However, the order count and transaction amount are not high enough to indicate large-scale platform sales performance, and the limited review count reduces validation strength. Therefore, the supplier fits the stable but moderate business performance range.

Final Score: 15/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: <=1h
- ODM service available: Listed
- Minor customization: Listed
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time is listed as within one hour, which is a strong indicator of communication efficiency. The platform labels show ODM service availability and minor customization, suggesting that the supplier can support some degree of product or service adaptation. However, the provided data does not confirm Full Customization capability, so this cannot be assumed.

Scoring Rationale:
Fast response time is a clear strength and supports efficient quotation, sample discussion, and order coordination. The presence of ODM and minor customization labels adds service flexibility. Since Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier should not receive the highest score under the stated scoring standard, but its available service indicators still place it in the strong service category.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided data. This suggests that recent orders handled through the platform have been dispatched within the committed timeframe. No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, logistics options, export documentation speed, or performance under bulk order conditions.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring criteria, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9 to 10 points. A 100.0% rate supports a full score for this dimension. The score is based strictly on the provided platform delivery metric.

Final Score: 10/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 4
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration:
The supplier has a 5.0 store rating and quality-related platform labels including Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. These indicators suggest that the supplier has some quality assurance mechanisms and positive feedback from existing buyers. However, the review count is only 4, which is too limited to strongly validate long-term product consistency. No third-party test reports, batch inspection records, or chemical compliance documentation are included in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale:
The high rating and Finished Product Inspection label support a positive quality assessment. Verified supplier status and warranty availability further strengthen basic confidence. Nevertheless, the small number of reviews and lack of detailed quality documentation prevent a higher score. The supplier appears to have basic-to-good quality assurance, but buyer-side verification remains necessary before larger or regulated chemical purchases.

Final Score: 15/20

Total Score: 80/100

Procurement Recommendation

Yida Hehao (Hebei) Chemical Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking mid-scale Chinese chemical suppliers with low MOQ availability, fast response, Trade Assurance support, and strong on-time dispatch performance. The supplier is suitable for sample orders, trial procurement, small-to-medium batch purchasing, and buyers who value platform-backed transaction protection.

Key risks include the limited review base, moderate six-month transaction volume, short 2-year Gold Supplier history, and insufficient data on production capacity, external certifications, chemical compliance documents, and large-order quality consistency. Buyers should request product specifications, COA, MSDS, batch testing records, export documentation, and any relevant third-party certifications before placing bulk or regulated-market orders.

Growth potential is present because the supplier has verified status, a sizable factory base, 100% on-time dispatch, responsive communication, and quality-related platform labels. If it can build a longer transaction history, accumulate more customer reviews, and provide stronger compliance documentation, its procurement attractiveness would improve further.