Hebei American Airlines Lubricants Oil Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Hebei American Airlines Lubricants Oil Co., Ltd. is a China-based lubricant supplier located in Hebei, offering motorcycle engine oil and related synthetic lubricant products with listed MOQs of 200 liters. The supplier shows a basic manufacturing foundation with a reported factory area of 4,000+ sqm, 10+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, response-time labeling, and a 100.0% on-time delivery tag, although the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year. Commercial performance is still limited, with only 3 orders and CN¥27K+ transaction value over the past six months, and no customer reviews or shop rating data available. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking small-volume trial orders or early-stage sourcing of motorcycle lubricant products. However, buyers requiring mature transaction history, strong public customer feedback, or extensive quality validation should proceed with caution due to insufficient review and rating data.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 4,000+ sqm
- Staff size: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope provided: synthetic motorcycle engine oil and related lubricant products
- Factory certification details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical production base with a factory area above 4,000 sqm, which indicates a tangible manufacturing operation rather than a purely trading profile based on the provided data. However, the reported employee count of 10+ staff suggests a relatively small workforce. While verified supplier status adds credibility to the company profile, there is no detailed information on production lines, annual output, machinery, laboratory capability, or formal factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability through factory size and verified supplier status, but the small staff scale and lack of detailed production capacity data limit confidence in large-volume or complex supply programs. It is stronger than an unverified small supplier, but it does not yet show the scale indicators of a medium or large stable factory.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier
- Platform labels: Response time ≤3h; On-time delivery 100.0%
- Additional compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform-level trust indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These elements support basic sourcing credibility and provide buyers with a more structured transaction environment. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year, which limits the evidence of long-term platform stability. No independent industry certifications, quality management certifications, or product compliance documents are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a legitimate supplier, but the short Gold Supplier history and lack of detailed compliance certification prevent a higher score. The profile is credible at a basic-to-moderate level, but not yet strongly validated over time.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 3
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥27K+
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded some recent transaction activity, but the commercial volume is low. Three orders over six months and CN¥27K+ in transaction value indicate early or limited platform sales performance. The absence of shop rating data and zero reviews significantly reduce the ability to assess buyer satisfaction, repeat demand, or transaction consistency from public marketplace evidence.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is commercially validated to a limited extent because transactions exist, but the order count and transaction value are both low. The lack of reviews and missing shop rating make it difficult to confirm market acceptance or customer experience. This places the supplier in the lower performance range.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Platform label: Response time ≤3h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
- Additional communication metrics: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤3h indicates acceptable communication efficiency for routine sourcing inquiries. This is useful for buyers conducting price checks, MOQ confirmation, or early-stage sample discussions. However, there is no provided evidence of Full Customization capability, OEM/ODM service, dedicated account support, or multilingual communication capacity.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs reasonably on response speed, but the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. In addition, customization capability is not confirmed. Therefore, the service capability appears functional but not highly differentiated.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong indicator within the provided platform data. This suggests that completed platform orders have met delivery timing expectations. However, because only 3 orders were recorded in the past six months, the delivery performance sample size appears limited.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The 100.0% figure supports a high score, but the low order volume prevents assigning a perfect rating because the delivery record has not been proven across a larger transaction base.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided
- Product quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s quality and customer feedback profile is weakly evidenced in the provided data. Although verified supplier status offers some baseline credibility, there are no public customer reviews, no shop score, and no stated Finished Product Inspection capability. For lubricant products, buyers often need quality-related documentation, but no such certification or inspection data is included here.

Scoring Rationale
The absence of reviews and shop rating creates a significant gap in customer feedback validation. Verified supplier status provides some assurance, but it is not enough to confirm product consistency, after-sales handling, or quality control maturity. The score is therefore constrained by insufficient quality-system and customer-feedback evidence.

Final Score
9 / 20

Total Score

• Company Strength: 12 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 15 / 20
• Business Performance: 10 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 9 / 20

Total Score: 62 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-volume trial procurement or early-stage supplier screening. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking motorcycle engine oil or synthetic lubricant products with relatively low MOQ requirements of 200 liters and who are willing to validate quality before scaling orders.

The main risks are limited transaction history, zero customer reviews, missing shop rating, insufficient quality inspection information, and lack of disclosed product or factory certifications. These gaps make it unsuitable as a sole supplier for high-volume or quality-critical procurement without further verification.

Growth potential exists because the supplier has verified supplier status, Trade Assurance, Gold Supplier membership, 100.0% on-time delivery, and acceptable response speed. Recommended buyer actions include requesting product test reports, factory audit documents, lubricant specification sheets, sample testing, packaging details, and written quality-control procedures before placing larger orders.