Yunkai Clothing (Foshan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yunkai Clothing (Foshan) Co., Ltd. is a China-based apparel supplier located in Guangdong, with reported factory scale of 16,000+㎡ and 500+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company shows strong physical production capacity and has factory verification status, indicating a relatively solid manufacturing foundation for garment sourcing. Its platform profile includes Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, response time ≤1h, low MOQ for customization, and 100.0% on-time delivery, which supports basic platform credibility and service responsiveness. However, the supplier has only 1 year of Gold Supplier history, 9 orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value in the past six months, and only 1 customer review, meaning its commercial track record and customer feedback base remain limited. This supplier is more suitable for buyers seeking small-batch customized menswear or streetwear-style apparel with low MOQ requirements, while larger buyers should conduct additional due diligence before placing high-volume orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 points

Basis

• Company: Yunkai Clothing (Foshan) Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Guangdong
• Factory area: 16,000+㎡
• Staff size: 500+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of more than 16,000 square meters and a workforce exceeding 500 employees. For an apparel manufacturer, this indicates a relatively sizable production base and suggests that the company is not a small workshop-level supplier. The presence of factory verification further strengthens its company profile because it provides a basic level of third-party or platform-backed credibility regarding operational existence and production setup.

The company appears positioned as a garment manufacturing supplier with multiple listed men’s fashion and streetwear-related products. The available product data shows low MOQ levels, mainly 30 pieces or 30 packs, which may indicate flexibility for smaller buyers or customized orders. However, no detailed information is provided regarding monthly production capacity, production lines, machinery, export markets, or specific factory certifications beyond verification status.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 16,000+㎡ factory area, 500+ staff, and verified supplier status supports a strong rating under Company Strength. These indicators align with a large-scale or at least upper-medium manufacturing supplier. However, the score is not placed at the maximum level because the data does not include detailed production capacity, factory audit report details, equipment lists, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, the supplier demonstrates strong physical and organizational capacity, but the available information is not complete enough to confirm top-tier supply chain stability.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Platform labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Response time ≤1h
• On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Trade Assurance is a positive procurement protection mechanism because it can support transaction security for buyers using the platform. The verification status also adds credibility to the supplier’s profile.

However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the supplier’s long-term platform track record. The provided certification or industry tags are useful but operational in nature, mainly related to MOQ, response time, and delivery performance. No additional compliance certifications, product certifications, quality system certifications, social compliance audits, or industry-specific certifications are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a legitimate supplier: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. These are meaningful indicators and reduce basic sourcing risk. However, the short Gold Supplier duration of only 1 year prevents a higher score, as there is limited evidence of long-term platform performance. In addition, the certification label set is not comprehensive and does not include broader compliance or quality certification information. As a result, the supplier fits the category of having core certification support but a relatively short platform history.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 9
• Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥13.5K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has completed 9 orders in the past six months, with a reported transaction amount of CN¥13.5K+. This indicates that the supplier has some actual transaction activity on the platform, but the commercial volume remains relatively low. The store rating is 5.0, which is positive, but it is based on only 1 review. Therefore, the rating is not yet statistically strong enough to represent broad buyer satisfaction.

The limited transaction value and small review base suggest that the supplier’s online business validation is still at an early stage. While there is evidence of successful orders, the current data does not show high order frequency, high transaction volume, or a large base of repeat or reviewed customers.

Scoring Rationale

The 5.0 rating is favorable, but the low number of reviews significantly limits confidence in the supplier’s business performance. Nine orders over six months and CN¥13.5K+ in transaction value represent a modest level of activity rather than a strong commercial track record. This places the supplier in the lower-to-mid performance range: there is some marketplace validation, but not enough to confirm consistent demand, high-volume fulfillment experience, or broad customer acceptance.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤1h
• Platform label: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as ≤1 hour, which is a strong service indicator and supports efficient early-stage communication. For procurement teams, fast response time is important during quotation comparison, sample discussion, order clarification, and issue resolution. The supplier also carries the label “Low MOQ for customization,” suggesting that it may support customized orders at relatively small quantities.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization.” The available information only supports low MOQ customization, not complete product development, private-label support, fabric sourcing, pattern development, or full OEM/ODM service capability. Therefore, the customization capability should be treated as basic to moderate based strictly on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed meets the highest service-response threshold, which is a clear strength. The supplier also appears suitable for buyers needing low MOQ customization. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed in the data, the service score should not reach the 9–10 range, which requires both fast response and strong customization capability. The supplier demonstrates good service responsiveness but only partially evidenced customization depth.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is a strong delivery indicator. From a procurement perspective, reliable delivery performance is especially important for apparel products where seasonality, launch timing, and retail schedules can affect sales outcomes. A 100.0% on-time delivery rate suggests that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has met delivery commitments for recorded orders.

However, the broader reliability of this indicator should be viewed alongside the business volume data. Since only 9 orders were recorded in the past six months, the delivery performance is positive but based on a relatively limited transaction sample.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. The supplier’s 100.0% rate meets the highest delivery performance threshold. Nevertheless, because the order base is not large, the score is placed at 9 rather than the absolute maximum. The available data supports strong delivery performance, but the limited number of orders reduces the robustness of the indicator.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive. However, this rating is based on only 1 review, meaning the customer feedback pool is very limited. A single review does not provide enough evidence to evaluate consistency in product quality, communication, after-sales service, or order fulfillment across multiple buyers and order types.

Factory verification provides a basic quality-related assurance because it indicates that the supplier’s operational presence has been verified. However, the dataset does not include evidence of Finished Product Inspection, quality control procedures, third-party inspection support, product testing, or quality management system certification. As a result, the supplier’s quality assurance system cannot be fully assessed based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives a moderate score because it has a perfect store rating and verified supplier status, both of which are positive signals. However, the extremely low number of reviews and the absence of Finished Product Inspection data limit confidence in product quality consistency. The supplier shows basic quality credibility but does not yet provide enough evidence for a high quality assurance rating.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Yunkai Clothing (Foshan) Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking low-MOQ apparel sourcing, small-batch customized menswear, or streetwear-style garment orders. The supplier has strong company-scale indicators, including 16,000+㎡ factory area, 500+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its response time of ≤1 hour and 100.0% on-time delivery rate are also positive operational signals.

However, the supplier’s commercial validation is still limited. The past six-month performance shows only 9 orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value, while the 5.0 store rating is supported by only 1 review. Gold Supplier history is also only 1 year. In addition, Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization capabilities are not confirmed in the provided data.

For procurement teams, this supplier is suitable for trial orders, sample development, and controlled-volume purchasing. For large-volume or long-term programs, buyers should request additional documentation, such as factory audit details, quality inspection process evidence, production capacity confirmation, and sample approval before scaling up cooperation. The supplier shows growth potential due to its factory size, fast response, low MOQ customization positioning, and verified status, but its transaction and customer feedback record needs further accumulation.