Shaoxing Keqiao Geweiya Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shaoxing Keqiao Geweiya Textile Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based textile supplier focused on cotton, organic cotton, linen, dyed, printed, and denim-related fabric products, with listed MOQs of 100 meters across the provided product range. The company shows a small-to-mid operational footprint, with a reported factory area of 1,500+㎡ and 30+ staff, supported by verified supplier status. Its strongest profile is platform credibility: it has 13 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and carries platform tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, and low MOQ customization. Commercial activity is visible, with 100+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value in the past six months, although the customer feedback base is limited at 10 reviews and a 4.2 store rating. The main concern is delivery reliability, with an on-time dispatch rate of only 64.0%. This supplier may suit buyers seeking flexible MOQ textile sourcing, ODM support, and moderate-volume fabric procurement, but delivery risk should be actively managed.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company: Shaoxing Keqiao Geweiya Textile Co., Ltd.
• Location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 1,500+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier/factory status: True
• Production capacity data: Insufficient Data
• Specific factory management certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined physical operating base with a reported factory area of over 1,500㎡ and more than 30 employees. This indicates an established but relatively compact production setup rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturing base. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has passed at least a basic platform-level verification process. However, the provided data does not include monthly production capacity, number of production lines, equipment details, warehouse scale, or formal factory certifications. Therefore, while the company appears to have real operational capability, its ability to support large-volume or highly time-sensitive procurement cannot be fully confirmed from the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier does not qualify as a large-scale stable supply chain because the reported factory size and workforce are modest, and production capacity is not disclosed. However, it is stronger than an unverified small trader because it has a physical factory profile and verified supplier status. The appropriate assessment is that it is a small-to-medium textile supplier with basic production capability and some operational credibility, but with insufficient evidence to rate it as a large or highly scalable factory.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier/factory status: True
• Platform/industry tags:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Formal third-party compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. A 13-year Gold Supplier history is a meaningful indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with an additional transactional protection mechanism. Verified supplier status further improves trustworthiness compared with unverified sellers. The listed tags also suggest service and quality-related platform features, including finished product inspection and ODM service availability. However, the data does not provide formal compliance certificates such as factory audit reports, textile safety certifications, sustainability certificates, or independent third-party compliance documentation. Product names include organic and GOTS-related descriptions, but no separate certification document is provided in the data, so these cannot be treated as verified certifications.

Scoring Rationale

This is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions. The combination of 13 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, verified status, and several platform tags supports a high credibility score. The score is not a full 20 because the data lacks detailed certification documentation or independent compliance evidence beyond the platform indicators.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
• Store rating: 4.2
• Number of reviews: 10

Elaboration

The supplier has visible recent transaction activity, with more than 100 orders and over CN¥540.9K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier is commercially active and has received market validation from platform buyers. However, the customer feedback base is relatively limited, with only 10 reviews. The store rating of 4.2 is acceptable but not high compared with suppliers that maintain stronger customer satisfaction indicators. The order and transaction data show moderate commercial traction, but the low number of reviews limits confidence in the consistency of buyer experience.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s business performance is stronger than suppliers with little or no transaction history, because 100+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ in six-month sales show actual commercial activity. However, the 4.2 rating and only 10 reviews prevent classification as a high-performing supplier with strong customer validation. The business profile is best categorized as stable but not yet strongly proven by broad customer feedback.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Response time: ≤3h
• Customization-related tags:
• Low MOQ for customization
• ODM service available
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within three hours is reasonable and suggests acceptable communication efficiency for general procurement inquiries. The platform tags indicate some customization support, including low MOQ customization and ODM service availability. This is useful for buyers seeking fabric development, small-batch customization, or design-based sourcing flexibility. However, the data does not explicitly state “Full Customization,” nor does it provide details on sample development speed, technical design support, fabric testing support, or dedicated account management. Therefore, service capability appears functional but cannot be rated as highly advanced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a mid-level service score because it responds within a reasonable timeframe and has customization-related service tags. However, because response time is not within one hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, it does not meet the highest service-performance standard. The available data supports a rating consistent with normal service capability and basic-to-moderate customization support.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 64.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is the weakest indicator in the provided dataset. At 64.0%, the supplier falls below the 70% threshold. This suggests a material delivery reliability concern, especially for buyers operating under strict production schedules, seasonal retail timelines, or replenishment deadlines. The data does not provide reasons for the low dispatch rate, such as order complexity, customization requirements, raw material delays, or logistics constraints. Therefore, the issue should be treated as a confirmed risk based strictly on the available on-time dispatch data.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive less than 5 points. Since 64.0% is meaningfully below the acceptable threshold, the supplier receives a low delivery score. This does not mean the supplier cannot fulfill orders, but it indicates that delivery commitment needs careful management before cooperation.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.2
• Number of reviews: 10
• Finished Product Inspection: True, based on platform tag
• Factory Verification: True
• Detailed quality certifications or inspection reports: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier/factory status. These are positive signs because they indicate that the supplier has platform-recognized quality or verification mechanisms. However, the customer feedback dataset is limited. A 4.2 store rating is acceptable but not excellent, and only 10 reviews provide a narrow basis for assessing long-term quality consistency. There is also no detailed information on defect rates, inspection standards, textile testing reports, return rates, or buyer complaint patterns. As a result, the supplier shows basic quality control credibility, but the customer feedback evidence is not strong enough to support a high quality score.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs better than suppliers with no quality controls or no customer feedback because it has Finished Product Inspection and factory verification indicators. However, the limited review count and moderate 4.2 rating reduce confidence in consistent quality performance. The quality profile is acceptable but requires additional buyer-side verification before larger commitments.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Shaoxing Keqiao Geweiya Textile Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking textile fabrics with relatively low MOQ requirements, ODM availability, and platform-backed transaction protection. The supplier is particularly relevant for small-to-medium buyers, fabric traders, apparel developers, and brands requiring flexible sourcing of cotton, organic cotton, linen, dyed, printed, or denim-related fabrics.

However, cooperation should be managed carefully due to the 64.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the primary risk. Buyers with strict delivery deadlines should confirm lead times in writing, use Trade Assurance, request pre-shipment updates, and consider trial orders before scaling volume. Another risk is the limited customer feedback base, with only 10 reviews and a 4.2 rating, which makes long-term quality consistency less fully validated.

The supplier’s growth potential lies in its long presence, verified status, ODM service availability, low MOQ customization, and visible recent transaction activity. If delivery reliability improves and customer feedback volume increases, the supplier could become a stronger candidate for broader textile sourcing programs.