Taizhou Baiyun Jixiang Decorative Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Taizhou Baiyun Jixiang Decorative Material Co., Ltd. is a China-based decorative material supplier located in Zhejiang, focusing on aluminium composite panel-related products, including ACP samples, wall cladding ACP materials, fireproof aluminium composite panels, PE ACP/ACM panels, and aluminum panel products. The company reports a factory area of 2,600+ sqm and 60+ staff, indicating a small-to-medium production base with basic manufacturing capability. Its strongest credibility factor is its platform profile: 20 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. However, recent commercial activity is limited, with only 1 order in the past six months, CN¥40.5K+ transaction value, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. Service capability is acceptable, supported by Full Customization, ODM availability, minor customization, and response time within 2 hours. This supplier is more suitable for buyers who value long platform history, verified supplier status, and customized ACP-related products, but who can tolerate limited recent transaction validation and weak customer feedback visibility.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 2,600+ sqm
- Employees: 60+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes multiple aluminium composite panel and decorative material products

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical production base with a reported factory area of over 2,600 sqm and more than 60 employees. This suggests that the company has established operational capacity rather than operating only as a trading storefront. The available product listings also show a focused product category around aluminium composite panels and related wall/decorative materials, which supports a certain degree of production specialization.

Scoring Rationale
The company does not appear to be a large-scale manufacturer based on the provided factory size and employee count, but it demonstrates a functional production base and verified supplier status. The scale is sufficient for small-to-medium procurement needs, especially for buyers sourcing ACP-related decorative materials. However, the data does not show large factory area, high employee count, major production lines, annual capacity, or internationally recognized factory certifications beyond supplier verification.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 20 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization, Response time ≤2h

Elaboration
The supplier has a long-standing presence, with 20 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a strong platform credibility indicator because it reflects long-term continuity on the marketplace. Trade Assurance support also improves buyer protection during transactions. The verified supplier status further strengthens platform-level credibility, while service labels such as Full Customization and ODM availability indicate documented platform capabilities.

Scoring Rationale
This is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions. A 20-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status represent a relatively complete credibility profile. The only limitation is that the provided data does not include additional compliance certifications, product certifications, audit reports, or third-party factory certification details beyond the platform verification and labels.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 1
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥40.5K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded recent transaction activity, but the volume is very limited. One order in six months indicates low recent order frequency on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥40.5K+ shows that at least one meaningful transaction occurred, but it is not enough to demonstrate broad market acceptance or sustained purchasing activity. The absence of a store rating and 0 reviews significantly limits commercial validation.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is constrained by low order count and lack of customer review evidence. While the transaction amount is not negligible, the limited number of orders and absence of rating/reviews mean the supplier has weak recent marketplace validation. This does not necessarily indicate poor business capability, but the available data does not support a high business performance score.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform labels: Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization
- Response time label: ≤2h

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates service capability through customization-related platform labels. Full Customization and ODM service availability indicate that the supplier may support tailored product requirements within its ACP/decorative material scope. The stated response time of within 2 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has solid service indicators, especially customization and ODM support. However, the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, so it should not receive the highest service score. The data also does not include detailed evidence of project management capability, sample lead time, engineering support, after-sales process, or multilingual service capability.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator based on the available data. This suggests that completed platform orders were shipped on schedule. However, this result should be interpreted together with the business performance data, because only 1 order was recorded in the past six months.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier earns the maximum score for this dimension. The main caution is that the delivery performance sample size appears limited due to the low recent order count.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: supplier verification marked as True

Elaboration
Quality and customer feedback data are limited. The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some platform-level assurance regarding its business identity or factory profile. However, there is no available store rating, no customer reviews, and no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection. As a result, the supplier’s actual product quality consistency and customer satisfaction cannot be strongly validated from the submitted data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier receives partial credit because verified supplier status provides some quality-related credibility. However, the lack of customer reviews, missing store rating, and absence of Finished Product Inspection information prevent a stronger assessment. For procurement decisions, this dimension requires additional due diligence, such as requesting samples, inspection reports, material specifications, and order references.

Final Score
10 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 71 / 100

• Company Strength: 14 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
• Business Performance: 10 / 20
• Service Capability: 8 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 10 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended, especially for buyers seeking aluminium composite panel and decorative material suppliers with long platform history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and customization capability. The supplier appears suitable for small-to-medium procurement projects, sample-based evaluation, customized ACP-related requirements, and buyers who prioritize platform credibility.

However, the main risks are weak recent business validation, only 1 order in the past six months, 0 reviews, missing store rating, and insufficient quality feedback data. Finished Product Inspection information is also not provided. Before placing larger orders, buyers should request product samples, confirm technical specifications, verify fireproof or material performance claims where relevant, and consider third-party pre-shipment inspection.

The supplier’s growth potential lies in its long platform presence, customization labels, ODM availability, and perfect reported on-time delivery rate. If it can improve customer review accumulation, transaction volume, and quality documentation transparency, its procurement attractiveness would become significantly stronger.