Shanghai Tankii Alloy Material Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Tankii Alloy Material Co, Ltd. is a China-based alloy material supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 7,500+㎡ and 40+ staff. The supplier offers multiple alloy-related products, including stainless steel welding rod wire, copper nickel alloy wire strip, nichrome material, heating wire, and tungsten filament. Based on the provided data, the company shows a stable but not large-scale production profile, supported by verified supplier status, 17 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its recent business performance indicates moderate platform activity, with 20+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is strong at 4.9, though the review count is limited at 10. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking alloy materials from a long-standing platform supplier with reliable delivery records, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity, quality inspection systems, customization ability, and order scalability before high-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 7,500+㎡
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Shanghai, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a physical factory footprint of over 7,500㎡ and a workforce of more than 40 employees. This indicates an established operating base, but the staff size suggests a medium-to-small manufacturing organization rather than a large-scale industrial producer. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s basic operational presence.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capability, supported by factory space and supplier verification. However, the employee count is relatively limited, and there is no provided data on annual output, production lines, equipment capacity, or factory audit details. Therefore, it should not be rated as a large-scale supply chain operator.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 17 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long operating history as a 17-year Gold Supplier, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance availability further supports transaction security. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens platform trust, although the provided certification tags are operational rather than formal product or factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has strong platform credibility due to its long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. However, the data does not show detailed third-party factory audit reports, ISO certifications, product compliance certificates, or industry-specific quality certifications. This prevents a perfect score.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in the past six months: 20+
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 10

Elaboration:
The supplier has visible commercial activity, with over 20 orders and more than CN¥135.2K in transaction value over the past six months. The 4.9 store rating is positive, but the review base of 10 is relatively small, limiting the statistical strength of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale:
The business record shows stable but not high-volume transaction performance. The order count and transaction value indicate real recent buyer activity, while the high store rating supports buyer satisfaction. However, the limited number of reviews and moderate transaction scale mean the commercial validation is not yet strong enough for a high-score category.

Final Score: 14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within three hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, design customization, sample customization, or engineering-based buyer requirements.

Scoring Rationale:
The response time is reasonable but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. Because customization capability is not provided, the service assessment must remain conservative. The supplier appears capable of standard communication but lacks enough data to confirm advanced service capability.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong indicator of delivery reliability within the available platform data. This is especially relevant for procurement buyers that require predictable shipment execution.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. No negative delivery data was provided.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 10
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status provided

Elaboration:
The store rating of 4.9 suggests positive customer satisfaction, but the total review count of 10 is limited. Verified supplier status provides some confidence in supplier legitimacy, but there is no provided information on finished product inspection, formal quality control process, product certifications, or third-party quality audit results.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows good customer feedback quality in rating terms, but the low number of reviews weakens the confidence level. The verified supplier status supports basic trust, yet the absence of finished product inspection data limits assurance over systematic quality control. A mid-to-good score is appropriate, but not a top-tier rating.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scale and appropriate pre-shipment verification. Shanghai Tankii Alloy Material Co, Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing alloy wires, strips, heating wire, welding wire, or related alloy materials from a long-standing supplier with strong platform credibility and excellent reported delivery performance.

The main risks are limited employee scale, moderate recent transaction volume, only 10 customer reviews, and insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, product certifications, and detailed factory audit results. For larger-volume or specification-sensitive procurement, buyers should request samples, quality inspection documents, production capacity evidence, and written technical specifications before placing major orders.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its 17-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its current profile is best suited for small-to-medium procurement programs or trial orders before scaling.