Hefei Jubao New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Hefei Jubao New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of 2,400+ m² and 20+ staff. The company appears to focus on lithium battery-related products, including LiFePO4 battery cells and electric motorcycle battery products, based on the provided product listings. It has a 5-year Gold Supplier profile, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a reasonable level of platform credibility. Commercially, the supplier shows meaningful transaction activity, with 30+ orders and CN¥14.8M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the review base is limited at only 8 reviews, despite a 4.7 store rating. Service data indicates response within 4 hours, but there is insufficient data on full customization capability. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume battery-related sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, while buyers requiring extensive quality documentation should conduct further due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — Final Score: 13/20

Basis:
- Factory area: 2,400+ m²
- Staff size: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory or audit certification details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a clearly stated physical operating base with a factory area above 2,400 m² and more than 20 staff. This indicates basic production or operational capacity, but the scale remains relatively small compared with large industrial battery manufacturers. The verified supplier status improves confidence in the company’s existence and operational legitimacy, but no detailed factory audit report, production line capacity, equipment list, or formal factory certification data is provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates a real operational footprint and basic manufacturing or supply capability. However, the limited staff size and modest factory area prevent it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. Since detailed production capacity and factory certification evidence are not available, the score is placed at the upper end of the “small but basic production capability” range.

Final Score: 13/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — Final Score: 17/20

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry tags: Response time ≤4h
- Other compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a 5-year Gold Supplier history and supports Trade Assurance, both of which strengthen platform-level credibility. Verified supplier status further supports basic trustworthiness on the platform. However, the only listed certification or industry tag is related to response time, not product compliance, factory audit depth, or quality certification.

Scoring Rationale:
A 5-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status together represent a solid platform credibility profile. The score is not higher because there is insufficient data on formal product certifications, factory audit details, or industry-specific compliance documentation.

Final Score: 17/20

3. Business Performance — Final Score: 16/20

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 30+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥14.8M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 8

Elaboration:
The supplier shows notable commercial activity, especially with CN¥14.8M+ in transaction value over the past six months. The 30+ order count indicates active buyer engagement, though it is not a high-volume order profile. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, but the review count is low, which limits the reliability of customer feedback as a performance indicator.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction value is strong and suggests meaningful business execution. However, the relatively modest order count and limited number of reviews reduce the strength of commercial validation. This supports a stable medium-level business performance score rather than a top-tier score.

Final Score: 16/20

4. Service Capability — Final Score: 7/10

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s stated response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. There is no provided evidence confirming Full Customization capability, engineering support, sample development, or structured project management service.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates normal responsiveness but lacks confirmed data on advanced customization capability. Therefore, it fits the “normal response and basic service capability” range, but not the highest service tier.

Final Score: 7/10

5. Delivery Performance — Final Score: 9/10

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 92.3%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate exceeds 90%, which indicates strong delivery reliability based on the provided platform data. This is particularly relevant for procurement planning, as battery-related products often require predictable shipment timelines.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the rate is 92.3%, the supplier earns a strong score, though not the maximum because the data does not include shipment volume, delay causes, or historical consistency beyond the stated rate.

Final Score: 9/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — Final Score: 13/20

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 8
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier marked as True
- Product quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, but the review count is only 8, which limits the statistical reliability of customer feedback. Verified supplier status provides some quality-related confidence at the platform level, but there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, battery certifications, or third-party quality assurance systems.

Scoring Rationale:
The rating is favorable, but the low review volume and lack of documented inspection or quality certification data prevent a higher score. The supplier shows basic quality credibility but insufficient evidence of a comprehensive quality assurance system.

Final Score: 13/20

Total Score

75/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Hefei Jubao New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking battery-related products with moderate sourcing volumes, Trade Assurance protection, and acceptable delivery reliability. The supplier’s main strengths are its 5-year Gold Supplier status, CN¥14.8M+ recent transaction value, and 92.3% on-time delivery rate.

Key risks include limited company scale, low review count, insufficient data on Full Customization, and insufficient evidence of Finished Product Inspection or formal product quality certifications. Before placing large or technically demanding orders, buyers should request factory audit documents, battery test reports, inspection procedures, and sample validation. The supplier shows growth potential due to active transaction performance and stable platform credibility, but further quality verification is necessary for high-risk procurement.