zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Jc Sportline Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Jc Sportline Auto Parts Co., Ltd. is a China-based auto parts supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 60,000+ m² and 440+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a large-scale manufacturer with verified supplier status, long platform history, Trade Assurance support, and product listings focused on carbon fiber automotive exterior parts such as rear spoilers, racing wings, trunk lids, and roof spoilers. Its commercial performance is strong, with 700+ orders and CN¥18.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking established manufacturing capacity, low-MOQ carbon fiber auto accessory sourcing, and platform-backed transaction security. Key limitations include a delivery rate slightly below 90% and insufficient data on full customization capability, detailed quality certifications, or specific international compliance standards.

Jc Sportline Auto Parts Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 60,000+ m²
- Employees: 440+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates substantial physical production capacity through a factory area exceeding 60,000 m² and a workforce of more than 440 employees. This indicates a sizeable manufacturing operation rather than a small workshop or trading-only entity. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its operational base, although the provided data does not include specific factory audit reports, production line details, annual output, or equipment information.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of large factory space, a relatively high employee count, and verified supplier status supports a strong company-strength score. The supplier fits the profile of a large-scale and stable manufacturing operation. However, the score is not placed at the absolute maximum because detailed production capacity metrics, factory certification names, and audit documentation are not provided.

Final Score
19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available, Finished product inspection

Elaboration
The supplier has a long-standing presence as an 18-year Gold Supplier, which is a strong indicator of platform continuity and account stability. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with additional transaction protection. The presence of labels such as warranty availability and finished product inspection strengthens the supplier’s compliance and buyer-protection profile. However, the provided data does not mention external certifications such as ISO, IATF, CE, or other industry-specific compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale
An 18-year Gold Supplier history combined with Trade Assurance and inspection-related platform labels represents a highly credible platform profile. The supplier has strong marketplace validation and buyer-protection mechanisms. The only limitation is the lack of named third-party quality or factory management certifications, which prevents a perfect compliance score.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 700+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥18.2M+
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 100+

Elaboration
The supplier shows strong recent transaction activity, with more than 700 orders and over CN¥18.2M in transaction value within six months. This indicates active market demand and a meaningful level of buyer acceptance. The 4.5 store rating is positive, though not exceptionally high, and the 100+ review count provides a moderate base of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction value are both strong and suggest that the supplier has been commercially validated by buyers. The store rating of 4.5 is good but leaves some room for improvement, while the review count is useful but not extensive enough to fully eliminate customer-experience risk. Overall, the supplier demonstrates high business performance with minor limitations in rating strength and review depth.

Final Score
18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier reports a response time within two hours, which reflects acceptable communication efficiency for procurement communication. The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some customization flexibility, especially for lower-volume buyers. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports full customization, engineering design support, private labeling, mold development, or OEM/ODM services.

Scoring Rationale
The service capability is solid but not top-tier based on the available data. A response time of ≤2h is good, but the scoring standard gives the highest range to suppliers responding within one hour and supporting strong customization. Since full customization capability is not confirmed, the score remains in the normal-to-good service range rather than the excellent range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 89.6%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 89.6%, which is very close to the 90% threshold. This suggests generally reliable delivery execution, but it still falls within the 80–89% scoring band under the defined evaluation standard. For buyers with strict delivery timelines, this metric should be monitored during sample orders or initial bulk shipments.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided scoring rule, an on-time dispatch rate between 80% and 89% qualifies for 7–8 points. Since 89.6% is near the upper boundary and close to 90%, the supplier deserves the top score within this band, but not the 9–10 range.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 100+
- Finished product inspection: True, based on platform label
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status
- Specific quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.5 store rating and 100+ reviews, which provide a reasonable customer-feedback base. The finished product inspection label is a positive quality-control indicator, and verified supplier status adds further confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy. However, the provided data does not include defect rates, inspection standards, product test reports, warranty claim history, or recognized quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has good customer feedback and visible platform-backed quality indicators. The rating is positive but not exceptional, and the review count is moderate rather than extensive. Finished product inspection and verified supplier status support a favorable quality assessment, but the absence of detailed certification or inspection data limits the score from reaching the highest range.

Final Score
17 / 20

Total Score

88 / 100

  • Company Strength: 19 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
  • Business Performance: 18 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 8 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 17 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended, especially for buyers sourcing carbon fiber automotive exterior parts with a preference for established suppliers, verified factory background, Trade Assurance protection, and relatively low MOQ product options. The supplier appears suitable for small-to-medium importers, aftermarket auto parts distributors, online retailers, and buyers requiring stable supply from a sizeable manufacturer.

Key risks include the on-time dispatch rate of 89.6%, which is close to but still below the 90% high-performance threshold, and insufficient data regarding full customization capability, external quality certifications, detailed inspection standards, and international compliance documentation. Buyers should confirm customization scope, packaging standards, lead times, inspection procedures, and warranty terms before placing larger orders.

Overall, Jc Sportline Auto Parts Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, large-scale production indicators, and solid recent transaction performance. Its growth potential is positive if it improves delivery consistency and provides more transparent quality certification or inspection documentation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Jc Sportline Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jc Sportline Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Morida Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Morida Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Cop Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Cop Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Honha Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Honha Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Precision Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Precision Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Btongint (Shenzhen) Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Btongint (Shenzhen) Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huidong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huidong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tianyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tianyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Zhixia Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Zhixia Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Jiahua Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Jiahua Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huafeng Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huafeng Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe Fengchen Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe Fengchen Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Allspark Auto Parts (Changzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Allspark Auto Parts (Changzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Danyang Crocs Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Danyang Crocs Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Benke Auto Parts Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Benke Auto Parts Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Aoyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Aoyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Weilong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Weilong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fuxin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fuxin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huiying Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huiying Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Noble Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Noble Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Yiwu Zeyue Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zeyue Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luohe Tianshun Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luohe Tianshun Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Stark Yacht Marina Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Stark Yacht Marina Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lucky Worldwide Enterprise & Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lucky Worldwide Enterprise & Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tjyct Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tjyct Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu First Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu First Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Skma Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Skma Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tongrun Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tongrun Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Taixinli Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Taixinli Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huanyu (Shandong) Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huanyu (Shandong) Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Green Protect Decoration  Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Green Protect Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingyuan Holding Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingyuan Holding Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Naduo Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Naduo Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Aidi Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Aidi Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xksign Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Xksign Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huaxing Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huaxing Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026