zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Tongxiang Guangsheng Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Tongxiang Guangsheng Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 6,600+ sqm and 30+ staff. The company focuses on plastic and PVC corner-related products, including PVC drywall corner beads, PP/HDPE corner protectors, plastic strip edge guards, and related decorative plastic profiles. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and compliance visibility: it is listed as a 20-year Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and has supplier verification status, with service labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service available. However, business performance data is limited, with only 5 orders and CN¥54K+ transaction value in the past six months, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. Delivery performance is a major concern, with an on-time shipment rate of only 33.3%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing platform-backed sourcing and customizable plastic profile products, but delivery reliability and limited customer feedback require careful risk control.

Tongxiang Guangsheng Plastic Industry Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 6,600+ sqm
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical factory footprint of over 6,600 sqm, which indicates a tangible production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the reported workforce of 30+ staff suggests a relatively lean organization. This scale can support basic to moderate manufacturing activity, especially for standardized plastic profile products, but it does not indicate a large-scale labor or production structure.

Scoring Rationale
The factory area is a positive indicator, and verified supplier status strengthens confidence in the company’s operational existence. However, the employee count remains modest, and the data does not provide production line numbers, annual capacity, equipment details, export volume, or factory audit scope. Therefore, the supplier appears to have basic-to-moderate production capability rather than a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 20 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Finished product inspection, Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong platform-based credibility. A 20-year Gold Supplier record is a significant platform history indicator, while Trade Assurance provides transaction protection mechanisms for buyers. Verified supplier status further supports basic credibility. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related labels also indicates that the supplier has platform-recognized service and process capabilities.

Scoring Rationale
This is the supplier’s strongest dimension. The long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and verified status together create a relatively complete credibility profile. While no third-party international certifications such as ISO or product-specific compliance certificates are provided, the available platform credibility data is strong and consistent.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 5
- Transaction amount in past six months: CN¥54K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity, but the scale is limited. Five orders over six months and CN¥54K+ in transaction value show that buyers have placed orders through the platform, but the volume does not demonstrate strong market traction. The absence of a store rating and the lack of reviews reduce the ability to validate buyer satisfaction or repeat purchasing behavior.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some transaction history, so it should not be treated as commercially inactive. However, the low order count, moderate transaction amount, missing store rating, and 0 reviews significantly limit commercial validation. This creates uncertainty around demand consistency, buyer acceptance, and post-transaction satisfaction.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
- ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier provides several customization-related service labels, including full customization, minor customization, and ODM service availability. This suggests the supplier may be able to support product adjustments or buyer-specific requirements within its plastic profile product scope. The response time of ≤5h is acceptable, although it is not within the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates solid customization capability based on the platform labels provided. However, the response time is moderate rather than highly responsive. Since no additional data is provided on engineering support, sampling speed, multilingual support, or quotation turnaround, the score should reflect competent but not top-tier service capability.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 33.3%

Elaboration
Delivery performance is the most significant weakness in the available data. An on-time shipment rate of 33.3% is far below the 70% threshold and indicates a high risk of delayed fulfillment. For procurement teams managing project schedules, construction material supply, or inventory replenishment, this metric requires serious attention.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time shipment rate below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. At 33.3%, the supplier’s delivery reliability is weak based on the available platform data. Even though the company has strong platform credibility, delivery performance directly affects operational procurement risk.

Final Score
3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection label, which is a positive quality-control indicator. Verified supplier status also supports baseline confidence in the supplier profile. However, customer feedback is extremely limited because the store rating is not provided and the review count is 0. This prevents a reliable assessment of real buyer satisfaction, product consistency, complaint handling, or repeat order confidence.

Scoring Rationale
The quality assurance structure has some positive signals, especially Finished Product Inspection and supplier verification. However, the absence of store rating and reviews creates a major evidence gap. The supplier cannot be scored as high quality from customer feedback alone because there is no available buyer review base to support that conclusion.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

64 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 13 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
- Business Performance: 10 / 20
- Service Capability: 7 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 3 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 12 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended, not strongly recommended.

This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking plastic or PVC corner-related products from a platform-verified Chinese supplier with long history, Trade Assurance support, and customization capability. It may fit small to medium procurement programs, sample development, customized plastic profile sourcing, or buyers who value supplier verification and platform-backed transaction protection.

The main risks are weak delivery performance, limited recent order volume, missing store rating, and 0 customer reviews. The 33.3% on-time shipment rate is the most critical operational concern and should be addressed before placing time-sensitive orders.

Recommended procurement approach: start with a small trial order, confirm lead time in writing, use Trade Assurance, require pre-shipment inspection, and monitor delivery performance before scaling order volume. The supplier has growth potential due to its long platform presence, verified status, factory base, and customization labels, but stronger transaction history and improved delivery reliability are needed before it can be considered a low-risk strategic supplier.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Small Boss Special Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Small Boss Special Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Guangsheng Precision Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Guangsheng Precision Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Dazi Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Dazi Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yaxing Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yaxing Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Jinquan Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Jinquan Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Dongyi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Dongyi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Bojay Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Bojay Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taihe County Baiyun Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taihe County Baiyun Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hua Li Long Plastic Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hua Li Long Plastic Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Amp New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Amp New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sunshing Plastic Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Sunshing Plastic Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Jingliang Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Jingliang Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Litai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Litai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Chengcheng Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Chengcheng Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ruicheng Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ruicheng Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Beifeng Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Beifeng Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Santong Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Santong Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hero International (Shandong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hero International (Shandong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mcmani Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mcmani Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Shihui Stone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Shihui Stone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Feilong Home Electrical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Feilong Home Electrical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Outstanding Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Outstanding Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Xinqidian Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Xinqidian Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Lena Electric Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Lena Electric Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianjin Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianjin Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan My Metal Co. Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan My Metal Co. Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Perfecare Sanitary Products Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Perfecare Sanitary Products Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Rongke New Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Rongke New Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Naduo Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Naduo Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chuangwei Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chuangwei Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Chenle Shoes And Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Chenle Shoes And Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaiteng Communication Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaiteng Communication Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Deyi Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Deyi Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everich And Tomic Housewares Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everich And Tomic Housewares Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anzhi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anzhi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026