Taizhou Yaxing Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Taizhou Yaxing Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 27,000+ m² and 100+ staff. The company shows a solid manufacturing foundation for PTFE-related and high-temperature resistant material products, supported by verified supplier status on the platform. Its profile indicates strong platform credibility, including 19 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. Commercial performance is moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.7 store rating from 10 reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking an established, platform-verified manufacturer with customization capability and moderate order flexibility. However, the relatively limited review volume and 78.6% on-time delivery rate indicate delivery reliability and broader customer validation should be monitored before scaling procurement volume.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 27,000+ m²
- Employee count: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Product scope provided includes PTFE-related, heat-resistant, fireproof, oil-resistant, anti-static, and high-temperature resistant products.
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a reasonably strong physical manufacturing base, particularly through its reported 27,000+ m² factory area. A workforce of 100+ staff suggests the company is beyond a very small workshop scale and likely has basic organizational capacity to handle recurring production requirements. The verified supplier status further supports its operational legitimacy on the platform.
However, the data does not provide detailed production line numbers, monthly capacity, machinery list, quality lab capability, export volume, or third-party factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication. Therefore, while the company appears to have a stable manufacturing footprint, the available data is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale, fully transparent supply chain operation.
Scoring Rationale
The factory area is relatively substantial, and the staff size indicates a medium-scale production organization. Verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s manufacturing profile. However, because production capacity, equipment details, and formal factory audit documentation are not provided, the score should remain within the medium stable factory range rather than the top-tier large-scale range.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 19 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / platform labels: Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Minor Customization, ODM service available
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 19-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers. The verified supplier status and listed service/inspection labels further strengthen its credibility from a sourcing-risk perspective.
The available data includes platform-based trust indicators but does not mention internationally recognized management system certifications, product compliance certifications, or third-party industry-specific certificates. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but broader compliance documentation remains Insufficient Data.
Scoring Rationale
The combination of 19 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple platform labels represents a mature platform-backed credibility profile. The absence of specific external certifications prevents a perfect score, but the platform compliance foundation is highly complete based on the provided information.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past six months: 20+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Number of reviews: 10
Elaboration
The supplier has recent transaction activity, with 20+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ in sales over the past six months. This indicates active commercial operation rather than a dormant profile. The 4.7 store rating is positive, suggesting generally favorable customer satisfaction among available reviewers.
However, the business performance data is moderate rather than high-volume. The review count is only 10, which limits the statistical strength of the rating. The transaction value also indicates some market validation, but not enough to classify the supplier as a high-volume or heavily validated exporter based solely on the provided data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has verifiable recent sales and a good rating, which supports a stable mid-level commercial profile. However, the order volume, transaction amount, and review count are not high enough to justify a top-tier score. The limited number of reviews creates some uncertainty around broader customer satisfaction consistency.
Final Score
14 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
Elaboration
The supplier shows useful service capability for customized procurement. Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability indicate that the company can support buyers requiring product adaptation rather than only standard catalog purchases. The response time of ≤3 hours is acceptable and suggests normal communication efficiency, though it is not within the strongest ≤1 hour response benchmark.
No additional data is provided regarding English communication capability, dedicated account management, sample lead time, technical support process, or after-sales handling. These areas remain Insufficient Data.
Scoring Rationale
The customization capability is a clear strength, particularly for buyers needing tailored PTFE or high-temperature resistant material solutions. The response time is reasonable but not top-tier. Because service data is limited to response time and platform customization labels, the score is placed in the upper-middle range rather than the maximum range.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 78.6%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 78.6%, which places it in the 70–79% performance band. This indicates that delivery reliability may be a practical concern, especially for buyers with strict production schedules, seasonal demand, or time-sensitive replenishment requirements.
The data does not provide average lead time, late-shipment causes, logistics methods, peak-season capacity, or historical delivery trend. These are Insufficient Data. Based only on the provided metric, delivery performance is below the level expected from highly reliable suppliers.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, a 70–79% on-time delivery rate corresponds to 5–6 points. Since 78.6% is near the upper end of this band, the supplier receives the higher score within the range. Nevertheless, the rate is still below 80%, so delivery risk should be actively managed.
Final Score
6 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Number of reviews: 10
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification / verified supplier data: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a positive 4.7 store rating, which indicates generally favorable customer feedback among the available reviews. The presence of Finished Product Inspection is a meaningful quality-control indicator, suggesting that completed goods are subject to inspection before shipment. Verified supplier status also adds confidence in the company’s operating profile.
However, the review count is relatively small at 10, which limits the reliability of customer feedback as a broad quality indicator. The data does not include defect rates, inspection standards, test reports, product certifications, return rates, or customer complaint history. These points remain Insufficient Data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a good rating and some quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. However, the small review base prevents a higher score, as customer feedback is not yet broad enough to confirm consistent quality across a larger transaction history. The score reflects a good but not fully validated quality profile.
Final Score
15 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 16 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 19 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 14 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 6 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 15 / 20 |
| Total Score | 78 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Taizhou Yaxing Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, particularly for buyers seeking an established China-based supplier with platform credibility, customization capability, and moderate manufacturing scale.
The supplier is most suitable for: - Buyers sourcing PTFE-related, high-temperature resistant, fireproof, oil-resistant, or anti-static material products listed in the provided data - Small to medium-volume buyers requiring customization or ODM support - Buyers who value platform safeguards such as Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance - Procurement teams willing to conduct sample validation before larger orders
Key risks: - On-time delivery rate is 78.6%, indicating measurable delivery risk - Review count is limited to 10, reducing the strength of customer feedback validation - Detailed production capacity, machinery, product certifications, testing reports, and defect-rate data are Insufficient Data - External compliance certifications are not provided in the dataset
Growth potential appears positive due to the supplier’s 19-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, 27,000+ m² factory area, and customization capabilities. For initial cooperation, it is advisable to begin with sample orders or controlled trial orders, confirm lead times in writing, use Trade Assurance, and request product inspection documentation before scaling procurement volume.
Leave your comment