Guangzhou Glancy Doors And Windows Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Guangzhou Glancy Doors And Windows Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 7,400+ m² and 40+ staff. The company appears to operate as a verified supplier with Gold Supplier status for 4 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including warranty availability, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, and minor customization. Its listed product portfolio is concentrated around exterior doors/windows-related products, including wrought, security, grill design, and customized-size glass-related offerings, with low minimum order quantities of 2 square meters. Business performance shows 50+ orders and CN¥2.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 20+ reviews. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking a medium-scale, platform-verified manufacturer with moderate transaction validation, basic customization support, and strong reported delivery punctuality. However, its limited staff size, modest review base, and incomplete service customization data should be considered during procurement evaluation.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 7,400+ m²
- Employee count: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a physical factory footprint of more than 7,400 square meters, which indicates a meaningful manufacturing base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The employee count of 40+ staff suggests a small-to-medium operational structure. The verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has passed some form of supplier or factory verification on the platform, though the exact verification scope is not specified in the provided data.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capacity through its factory size and verified supplier status. However, the workforce size is relatively limited, and there is no provided information on production lines, annual capacity, machinery, or detailed factory audit results. Therefore, it should not be rated as a large-scale stable supply chain. Its profile is stronger than a small unverified supplier but still closer to a medium-light manufacturing operation.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has several key platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The 4-year Gold Supplier history provides a moderate level of platform continuity. The presence of labels such as finished product inspection and warranty availability adds additional compliance and buyer-protection relevance. However, no third-party international certifications, formal management system certifications, or detailed factory audit reports are provided in the data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core credibility elements needed for a relatively reliable sourcing profile: Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The 4-year tenure is positive but not long enough to be considered highly mature compared with suppliers with longer platform histories. Since the certification label set is useful but not comprehensive, the score falls into the range for suppliers with core certifications in place but limited deeper compliance evidence.
Final Score
16 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 50+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.2M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 20+
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 50 orders and over CN¥2.2 million in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active commercial activity and a measurable transaction base. The 4.7 store rating is positive, suggesting generally satisfactory customer experience. However, the review count of 20+ is relatively limited, meaning the rating is supported by a modest feedback sample rather than a broad customer base.
Scoring Rationale
The transaction value is meaningful for a medium-scale supplier, and the order count shows consistent platform activity. However, the supplier does not demonstrate very high order volume or a large review base. The available data supports a stable medium-level business performance assessment rather than a top-tier commercial validation score.
Final Score
16 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Service labels: ODM service available, Minor customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency, although it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The platform labels indicate ODM service availability and minor customization, which means the supplier can support some level of product adaptation. However, there is no provided confirmation of Full Customization capability, so it cannot be credited for strong full customization.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier offers reasonable service responsiveness and basic customization-related services. Because the response time is slower than the top scoring threshold and Full Customization is not confirmed in the provided data, the service capability should be evaluated as solid but not exceptional.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 95.8%
Elaboration
The reported on-time delivery rate of 95.8% is a strong delivery performance indicator. It exceeds the 90% threshold associated with the highest scoring band. This suggests that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has a reliable record of dispatching orders on schedule.
Scoring Rationale
Since the on-time delivery rate is above 90%, the supplier qualifies for a high score in delivery performance. The data is direct and quantifiable. A near-top score is appropriate because 95.8% indicates strong reliability, though it is not a perfect delivery record.
Final Score
9.5 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 20+
- Finished product inspection: Available
- Factory/verified supplier status: True
- Warranty available: Yes
Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.7 store rating, which is generally positive. The presence of finished product inspection and warranty availability provides useful quality assurance signals. Verified supplier status further supports the credibility of the supplier’s operating profile. However, the review count of 20+ is relatively modest, so the customer feedback base is not extensive. No detailed defect rate, inspection pass rate, product certification, or third-party quality audit data is provided.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several quality-related safeguards, including finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. The store rating is favorable, but the limited number of reviews restricts confidence in the consistency of customer satisfaction. Therefore, the supplier is stronger than a basic low-information supplier, but it does not reach the level of a supplier with extensive feedback and comprehensive quality documentation.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
79.5 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with moderate confidence, especially for buyers seeking exterior doors/windows-related products from a platform-verified Guangdong supplier with low MOQ, Trade Assurance support, acceptable customization capability, and strong reported delivery performance.
This supplier is most suitable for: - Small to medium buyers requiring moderate order volumes - Buyers seeking customized-size or minor customization products - Importers who value Trade Assurance and platform verification - Projects where delivery reliability is important
Main risk points: - Workforce size of 40+ staff suggests limited scalability compared with larger manufacturers - Review count of 20+ is not large enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency - Full Customization capability is not confirmed; only ODM service and minor customization are supported by the provided data - No detailed production capacity, machinery list, international certifications, or audit report scope is provided
Growth potential appears moderate. The supplier has a credible platform foundation, active recent transactions, and strong on-time delivery data. If future data confirms broader customization capability, larger customer feedback volume, and more detailed quality certification, its procurement attractiveness would improve further.
Leave your comment