Pan 'An County Shengyue Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Pan 'an County Shengyue Plastic Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based plastic products supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 2,000+㎡ and 10+ staff. The company appears to focus on low-MOQ plastic funnel-related products, including multi-function wide-mouth funnels, flexible plastic funnels, oil funnels, and filter-pipe funnel products, with listed MOQs of 10 pieces and prices mainly below CN¥2.37 per unit. The supplier holds Gold Supplier status for 4 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Platform labels include warranty availability, finished product inspection, full customization, and ODM service availability. Business activity is moderate, with 40+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating but only 10+ reviews. The supplier may suit small to mid-sized buyers, trial orders, price-sensitive procurement, and buyers needing basic customization. Key limitations are small staff scale, limited review volume, and relatively weak on-time delivery performance at 70.4%.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
Factory area: 2,000+㎡; staff: 10+; verified supplier: True.

Elaboration:
The supplier has a documented physical production base with a factory area above 2,000㎡, which indicates basic manufacturing capacity. However, the reported employee count of 10+ suggests a relatively small workforce rather than a large-scale industrial operation. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operating condition of the company.

Scoring Rationale:
The company shows baseline production capability and factory verification, but the small staff size limits confidence in large-volume production scalability. The factory area is reasonable for a small manufacturing supplier, yet the available data does not demonstrate large-scale capacity, multiple production lines, advanced equipment, or major factory certifications beyond verification.

Final Score: 12/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
Gold Supplier: True; Gold Supplier duration: 4 years; Trade Assurance: True; verified supplier: True; certification/industry labels: warranty available, finished product inspection, full customization, ODM service available.

Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. A 4-year Gold Supplier history shows a moderate level of platform continuity, while Trade Assurance provides transaction protection for buyers. The verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility. The listed labels also indicate service and inspection-related capabilities, although no independent product compliance certifications are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a relatively complete credibility profile, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. However, the Gold Supplier history is moderate rather than long-term, and there is insufficient data on internationally recognized compliance certificates or third-party product certifications. Therefore, the credibility level is solid but not top-tier.

Final Score: 16/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
Past 6-month orders: 40+; past 6-month transaction value: CN¥67.6K+; store rating: 4.6; reviews: 10+.

Elaboration:
The supplier has measurable recent transaction activity, with more than 40 orders over six months. The transaction value of CN¥67.6K+ indicates real commercial activity but not high-volume trading performance. A store rating of 4.6 is positive, although the review base of 10+ is relatively limited and reduces the statistical strength of the rating.

Scoring Rationale:
Business performance is moderate. The supplier has proven platform transactions and a good rating, but the order count, transaction value, and review quantity do not support classification as a high-volume or highly validated supplier. The commercial data is sufficient to show operating activity, but buyer validation remains limited.

Final Score: 14/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
Response time: ≤5h; full customization: listed; ODM service available: listed.

Elaboration:
The supplier provides a response time within five hours, which is acceptable but not exceptionally fast. The presence of full customization and ODM service labels suggests that the company can support customized procurement requirements. However, no data is provided on engineering team size, sample development speed, design support, language capability, or after-sales service process.

Scoring Rationale:
Service capability is above basic level due to the availability of customization and ODM service. However, the response time does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour, and supporting service details are limited. This makes the supplier suitable for standard communication and customization needs, but not clearly proven for highly complex or fast-moving projects.

Final Score: 7/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
On-time delivery rate: 70.4%.

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 70.4%, which falls within the 70–79% band. This indicates that delivery reliability is a notable concern compared with stronger suppliers exceeding 90%. For buyers with strict delivery schedules, this metric requires attention before placing larger or time-sensitive orders.

Scoring Rationale:
Based strictly on the provided scoring standard, a 70–79% on-time delivery rate corresponds to 5–6 points. Since the supplier is only slightly above 70%, the score should be placed at the lower end of that band.

Final Score: 5/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
Store rating: 4.6; reviews: 10+; finished product inspection: listed; verified supplier: True.

Elaboration:
The supplier has a good store rating of 4.6 and provides a finished product inspection label, which indicates some level of quality control before shipment. Verified supplier status also supports basic operational credibility. However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which is not enough to strongly validate long-term quality consistency across a large buyer base.

Scoring Rationale:
The quality profile is acceptable but not strongly proven. The rating is positive and finished product inspection is a useful quality assurance indicator, but the limited review volume weakens confidence in repeatable quality performance. No additional factory audit report details, defect rates, product test reports, or formal quality certifications are provided.

Final Score: 14/20

Total Score

68/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to mid-sized buyers, trial orders, low-MOQ sourcing, and price-sensitive procurement of plastic funnel-related products. The supplier has acceptable platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, moderate recent transaction activity, and basic customization capability.

Main risks include small staff scale, limited review volume, insufficient evidence of large-scale production capacity, and a relatively weak 70.4% on-time delivery rate. Buyers with strict delivery deadlines or large-volume requirements should conduct sample testing, confirm production lead times, and use Trade Assurance before scaling orders.

Growth potential exists if the supplier improves delivery reliability, expands verified transaction volume, and accumulates more customer reviews.