Yutian County Steel Wing Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yutian County Steel Wing Metal Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, offering copper-plated steel fiber related products with low minimum order quantities starting from 2 kilograms for several listed items. The company has a reported factory area of 1,700+ m² and 10+ staff, indicating a small-scale manufacturing operation with basic production capacity. It is marked as a verified supplier and holds Gold Supplier status for 1 year, with Trade Assurance enabled. Commercial performance is currently limited, with 3 orders and CN¥676.1+ transaction value over the past six months, although the shop rating is 5.0 based on 2 reviews. Delivery performance is strong based on the provided 100.0% on-time delivery rate. This supplier may be suitable for small-volume trial orders, sample procurement, or buyers seeking low-MOQ copper-plated steel fiber products, while larger procurement programs should treat scale and transaction history as key risk factors.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Hebei, China
- Factory area: 1,700+ m²
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical factory profile with a reported production site of over 1,700 m² and more than 10 employees. This indicates an established but relatively small operating base. The presence of verified supplier status provides some support that the company has passed a form of supplier verification, but the provided data does not include details on production lines, machinery capacity, annual output, management systems, or third-party factory audit scope.

Scoring Rationale
The company appears to have basic manufacturing capability, supported by a stated factory area and staff count. However, the workforce size and facility scale are modest, which limits confidence in high-volume or complex supply programs. Verified supplier status improves credibility, but there is insufficient data to classify the supplier as a medium or large-scale stable manufacturer.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has core platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements provide a basic level of platform-backed transaction security. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, and the listed labels are operational performance tags rather than formal product, factory, or management system certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several important platform credibility elements in place, especially Trade Assurance and verification. Nevertheless, the short Gold Supplier tenure and lack of detailed compliance or certification information prevent a higher score. The credibility profile is acceptable for cautious initial sourcing but not yet strongly proven over time.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 3
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥676.1+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration
The supplier’s recent commercial activity is limited. Three orders and CN¥676.1+ in transaction value over six months indicate a low level of platform-verified sales volume. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but it is based on only 2 reviews, which is too small a sample size to establish strong commercial reliability.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows some transaction record and positive customer rating, but the low order count, low transaction amount, and limited review base mean the business performance is not yet strongly validated. The available data supports a cautious view: performance is present but commercially underdeveloped.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform label: “Response time ≤2h”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a relatively prompt response capability, with response time listed as within 2 hours. This suggests acceptable communication efficiency for inquiry handling and early-stage sourcing discussions. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, design modification, OEM/ODM services, private labeling, or engineering support.

Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤2h is positive, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1h. Since customization capability is not confirmed, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service capability. The score reflects good responsiveness but incomplete evidence of broader service support.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
- Platform label: “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery indicator under the provided scoring framework. This suggests that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has fulfilled orders within expected delivery timelines.

Scoring Rationale
The on-time delivery rate exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring band. However, because the recent order count is only 3, the performance base is limited. The supplier still deserves a high delivery score, but the limited transaction volume slightly moderates confidence.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, but this is based on only 2 reviews. Such a small review base limits the reliability of the rating as a quality indicator. The supplier is marked as verified, which provides some baseline confidence, but the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, inspection reports, product certifications, or quality management system certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The rating is positive, but the limited number of reviews and lack of confirmed inspection systems reduce confidence in consistent quality performance. Verified supplier status supports basic credibility, yet there is insufficient evidence of a robust quality assurance framework.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

65 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended only on a cautious, trial-order basis. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ copper-plated steel fiber products, sample procurement, small-batch purchases, or early-stage supplier testing. Its main strengths are Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, fast response within 2 hours, low MOQs on several listed products, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate.

Key risks include small factory scale, limited staff size, short 1-year Gold Supplier history, only 3 orders in the past six months, low transaction value, and only 2 customer reviews. Quality assurance information is also incomplete, with no confirmed Finished Product Inspection or detailed factory verification scope provided.

Overall, Yutian County Steel Wing Metal Products Co., Ltd. has basic supplier credibility and acceptable service indicators, but its commercial validation and scale remain limited. Buyers should start with small orders, verify product specifications, request inspection evidence where applicable, and assess consistency before considering larger-volume procurement.