zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd.

Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, offering cashmere, wool, merino wool, and silk-blend yarn products with low minimum order quantities starting from 1 bag or 1 kilogram. The company reports a factory area of over 10,000㎡ and has been identified as a verified supplier, indicating a basic level of manufacturing and supplier credibility. However, the workforce size is relatively limited at 20+ staff, which may constrain large-scale or highly time-sensitive procurement programs.

On , the supplier holds 3 years of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and lists customization-related service tags including Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service. Commercial performance is still modest, with only 6 orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is 5.0, but based on only 2 reviews. The main concern is delivery reliability, with an on-time dispatch rate of 66.7%. This supplier is more suitable for small-batch, sample-stage, or flexible customization buyers rather than high-volume, deadline-critical procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Hebei, China
  • Factory area: 10,000+㎡
  • Employees: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area exceeding 10,000㎡, which suggests the availability of a relatively sizeable physical production or operating space. This is a positive indicator compared with very small workshop-level suppliers. The company is also marked as a verified supplier, which adds credibility to its basic operational existence and supplier profile.

However, the employee count is only stated as 20+ staff. For a textile or yarn supplier, this staffing level indicates a relatively lean organization. While the factory area appears substantial, the limited workforce may restrict production throughput, order handling capacity, quality control manpower, and responsiveness during peak periods. No detailed information is provided regarding production lines, annual capacity, machinery, factory certifications, or audit reports beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a basic-to-medium manufacturing foundation due to its 10,000+㎡ facility and verified supplier status. However, the 20+ staff size prevents it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. The lack of disclosed production capacity, equipment details, and formal factory certifications also limits confidence in its scalability. Therefore, it fits best within the “medium-to-small but operationally established” range.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 3 years and supports Trade Assurance, both of which are positive platform-level credibility signals. Trade Assurance provides buyers with a basic transaction protection mechanism, which is particularly relevant for overseas procurement or first-time purchases.

The company also lists several platform service tags, including warranty availability, full customization, minor customization, and ODM service availability. These tags indicate that the supplier positions itself as capable of supporting customized sourcing requirements. The verified supplier status further strengthens baseline credibility.

However, the Gold Supplier period is not yet long-term compared with more mature suppliers with 5–10+ years of platform history. In addition, no independent third-party certifications, product compliance certificates, textile safety certificates, or formal factory audit documents are provided in the dataset. Therefore, the platform credibility is acceptable but not comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the key credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier indication. These are meaningful for platform-based procurement. However, the 3-year duration is moderate rather than long-established, and the absence of detailed certification documentation prevents a higher score. The supplier has core platform credibility but not a fully mature compliance profile.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 6
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded 6 orders over the past six months, with a transaction value of CN¥6.7K+. This indicates that the store has active commercial transactions, but the scale is relatively low. The transaction volume does not yet demonstrate strong market validation or consistent bulk purchasing activity.

The store rating is 5.0, which is positive. However, the rating is based on only 2 reviews, so the statistical reliability is limited. A small number of reviews can reflect customer satisfaction from individual buyers, but it does not provide enough evidence to confirm stable long-term performance across a broad customer base.

There is no data provided regarding repeat buyers, key customers, export markets, annual sales, or order fulfillment history beyond the six-month platform data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows some commercial activity and a perfect store rating, but the order count and transaction amount are both low. The limited review base weakens the confidence level of the 5.0 rating. As a result, the supplier should be considered commercially active but still insufficiently validated for large-scale procurement decisions.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Service tags: Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 3 hours, which is acceptable for general B2B communication. While it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within 1 hour, it still indicates a reasonable level of communication efficiency.

The supplier also lists Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. This suggests that the supplier may be able to support differentiated product requirements, such as customized yarn specifications or buyer-specific development needs. However, the provided data does not include examples of customization projects, lead times for custom orders, technical design support, sample development capability, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a reasonable response time and claims multiple customization capabilities through platform tags. This supports a relatively good service score. However, because the response time is not within 1 hour and there is no further evidence of customization execution capability, the score remains below the top tier.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 66.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 66.7%, which is below the 70% threshold. This is the weakest area in the current supplier profile. For procurement buyers, especially those working with production schedules, seasonal launches, or downstream delivery commitments, this level of dispatch reliability represents a notable operational risk.

A low on-time dispatch rate may lead to delays in sampling, production planning, inventory replenishment, and customer delivery. The data does not provide reasons for delayed dispatch, such as order complexity, raw material constraints, logistics disruptions, or internal production issues. Therefore, the cause cannot be determined from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. Since the supplier’s rate is 66.7%, delivery performance is clearly below acceptable procurement expectations. This significantly affects its suitability for time-sensitive or bulk production orders.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 2
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier marked as True, but detailed factory verification documentation is not provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is a positive quality and service signal. However, this rating is supported by only 2 reviews, making the feedback base too small to provide strong statistical confidence. A small review count may indicate limited transaction history or limited customer feedback collection.

The supplier is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a basic level of assurance regarding the company profile. However, there is no explicit data confirming Finished Product Inspection, third-party quality inspection, textile testing standards, product compliance certifications, or detailed factory audit results.

Given that the supplier deals in yarn-related products, quality consistency can be important for buyers, but the dataset does not provide measurable quality indicators such as defect rate, color consistency records, fiber composition testing, or inspection reports.

Scoring Rationale

The 5.0 rating is favorable, and verified supplier status adds some credibility. However, the very low review count and lack of disclosed Finished Product Inspection information limit the reliability of the quality assessment. The supplier has basic quality credibility but insufficient evidence for a high score.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 11 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 4 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 13 / 20
Total Score 66 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended for small-batch, sample-stage, or low-risk customized yarn sourcing. Not recommended as a primary supplier for urgent or large-scale production orders at this stage.

Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd. has several positive attributes, including a 10,000+㎡ factory area, verified supplier status, 3 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and customization-related service tags. These factors make it a potentially useful supplier for buyers seeking flexible MOQ options, initial sample procurement, or exploratory sourcing of cashmere, wool, merino wool, and silk-blend yarn products.

However, the main risks are clear. Business validation is still limited, with only 6 orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value in the past six months. Customer feedback is also limited, with only 2 reviews despite a 5.0 rating. The most important operational concern is the 66.7% on-time dispatch rate, which is below acceptable procurement reliability standards.

For buyers considering this supplier, it is advisable to begin with small trial orders, use Trade Assurance, confirm delivery timelines in writing, and request quality inspection evidence before scaling purchase volume. The supplier has growth potential if it can improve delivery reliability, increase transaction history, and provide stronger quality documentation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Qinghe County Xinan Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe County Xinan Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yaoan Wiremesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yaoan Wiremesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzong County Langshibo Baby Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzong County Langshibo Baby Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pan 'An County Shengyue Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pan 'An County Shengyue Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Shengxiang Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Shengxiang Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Liancheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Liancheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yize Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yize Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Tengde Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Tengde Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Weizhong Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Weizhong Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yeqi Wiremesh Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yeqi Wiremesh Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Dongjie Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Dongjie Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Duhua Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Duhua Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Tuo Jiang Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Tuo Jiang Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Jingzhi Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Jingzhi Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County A.S.O Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County A.S.O Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Ady Source Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Ady Source Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Baiyi Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Baiyi Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yutian County Steel Wing Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yutian County Steel Wing Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xuwei Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xuwei Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Metal (Zhengzhou) Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Metal (Zhengzhou) Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoji Hanz Metal Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoji Hanz Metal Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wenbo Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wenbo Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kaiyuan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kaiyuan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Qimei Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Qimei Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Radar Beverage Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Radar Beverage Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shijingcheng Nonwoven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shijingcheng Nonwoven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dongwang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dongwang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Smart Life Intelligent Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Smart Life Intelligent Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yangda Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yangda Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kenuo Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kenuo Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo World Wide Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo World Wide Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Xin Xin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Xin Xin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Yachao Hardware Wire Mesh Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Yachao Hardware Wire Mesh Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Feilong Home Electrical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Feilong Home Electrical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yamian Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yamian Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fiberyard Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fiberyard Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Xiou Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Xiou Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dasen Electronics Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dasen Electronics Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026