zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Qinghe County Xinan Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Qinghe County Xinan Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd. is a China-based automotive spare parts supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 3,500+㎡ and 10+ staff. Its listed product scope includes automotive sealing strips, intake hoses, waterproof rear tail components, window rubber parts, and related car accessories. The supplier shows solid platform credibility, including 8 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, response time ≤1 hour, and 100.0% on-time delivery. Business performance is relatively strong, with 200+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 70+ reviews. However, the company is not marked as a verified supplier, and data on factory audit certification, full customization capability, and broader quality certifications is insufficient. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for small to medium-sized buyers seeking automotive rubber and spare parts with low MOQ and fast platform-based transaction support.

Qinghe County Xinan Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Hebei, China
  • Factory area: 3,500+㎡
  • Employees: 10+ staff
  • Verified supplier: False
  • Factory certification / audit information: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a measurable physical production base with a factory area exceeding 3,500㎡, which indicates a certain level of operational space for automotive spare parts handling, production, or warehousing. However, the reported workforce of only 10+ staff suggests a relatively small operating team. This limits evidence of large-scale manufacturing capacity compared with suppliers that have larger employee bases or verified production infrastructure.

The absence of verified supplier status weakens the reliability of the company strength assessment. No additional factory audit, production line certification, or third-party verification data is provided. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have basic production and supply capability, the data does not support classification as a large-scale or highly verified manufacturing operation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a defined factory area and active product listings, which supports basic operational capability. However, the small staff size and lack of verified supplier status reduce confidence in scalability and factory transparency. The company fits better into the category of a small supplier with basic production capacity rather than a large or fully verified factory.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • Response time ≤1h
  • On-time delivery 100.0%
  • Verified supplier: False

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform history, with 8 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a positive indicator of platform continuity and transaction presence. Trade Assurance support further improves buyer protection and platform-based transaction credibility.

The listed labels also strengthen the supplier’s compliance profile, especially Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and on-time delivery performance. However, the supplier is not marked as a verified supplier, and no factory verification or third-party audit certificate is provided in the available data. This creates a gap between platform credibility and deeper factory-level compliance validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong platform-level credibility due to long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and multiple operational labels. The main deduction is due to the absence of verified supplier status or factory verification. Therefore, it should be considered credible on-platform, but not fully validated at the factory audit level.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Review count: 70+

Elaboration

The supplier shows active commercial performance on the platform. More than 200 orders in the past six months indicates consistent buyer activity, while CN¥540.9K+ in transaction value reflects a meaningful level of sales volume for the listed automotive spare parts category.

The store rating of 4.8 is favorable and indicates generally positive buyer feedback. The review count of 70+ provides a moderate level of customer validation. While this is not an extremely large review base, it is sufficient to show that the supplier has accumulated real transaction feedback.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 200+ recent orders, CN¥540.9K+ transaction value, and a 4.8 rating supports a stable mid-level business performance profile. The supplier does not reach the highest score range because the review base, while useful, is not exceptionally large, and the transaction value indicates moderate rather than very high commercial scale.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤1h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Communication efficiency: Supported by response time label only

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤1 hour is a strong service indicator. Fast response is important for procurement communication, quotation confirmation, sample discussion, and order follow-up. This is especially valuable for buyers sourcing multiple automotive parts or confirming compatibility details.

However, there is no provided data confirming Full Customization capability. The supplier may offer standard listed products, but the dataset does not verify whether it supports OEM, ODM, private labeling, tooling development, or customized packaging. Therefore, the service score must be limited despite the excellent response time.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier qualifies for a good service score because response speed is strong. However, the absence of confirmed full customization capability prevents it from reaching the 9–10 range. The service capability is suitable for standard procurement communication, but customization depth remains unverified.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided dataset. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance for completed platform transactions. For buyers dealing with automotive spare parts, delivery reliability is important because delayed parts can affect repair, resale, or assembly schedules.

No additional logistics data, lead time data, or shipping method details are provided. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the reported on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it receives the maximum score for this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Review count: 70+
  • Finished Product Inspection: True
  • Warranty available: True
  • Factory Verification: Insufficient Data / Verified supplier marked False

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive customer feedback profile, with a 4.8 store rating and 70+ reviews. This indicates that buyers have generally been satisfied with transactions and product/service performance. The presence of Finished Product Inspection is also a meaningful quality-control indicator, as it suggests that final goods are checked before shipment.

Warranty availability adds another layer of buyer protection, especially for automotive spare parts where fit, durability, and functional reliability matter. However, the quality assurance system is not fully validated because factory verification is not confirmed, and the supplier is not marked as a verified supplier. No ISO, IATF, or other automotive quality management certification data is provided, so those cannot be assumed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a strong score due to its 4.8 rating, moderate review base, Finished Product Inspection, and warranty label. The score is not placed in the highest range because review volume is not very large and factory-level verification or formal quality certifications are not available in the provided data.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 17 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for trial orders and small-to-medium procurement volumes.

Qinghe County Xinan Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing listed automotive spare parts such as sealing strips, intake hoses, waterproof rear tail parts, window rubber components, and general car accessories. The supplier is especially appropriate for customers who value low MOQ, fast response, Trade Assurance protection, and platform-verified transaction history.

Suitable customer types: - Small and medium automotive parts distributors
- Repair parts buyers seeking flexible MOQ
- Buyers requiring fast supplier communication
- Procurement teams preferring Trade Assurance transactions

Main risk points: - Supplier is not marked as a verified supplier
- Factory audit or factory certification data is insufficient
- Employee scale is relatively small at 10+ staff
- Full customization capability is not confirmed
- Formal automotive quality certifications are not provided

Growth potential: The supplier shows positive growth indicators through 8 years of Gold Supplier history, 200+ recent orders, CN¥540.9K+ transaction value, 100.0% on-time delivery, and a 4.8 rating. If the supplier can provide factory verification, quality certifications, and clearer customization capability, its suitability for larger or more strategic procurement projects would improve significantly.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Qinghe Fengchen Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe Fengchen Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Gnl Elevator Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Gnl Elevator Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe Hanke Automotive Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe Hanke Automotive Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Morida Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Morida Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzong County Xinuonuo Bicycle Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzong County Xinuonuo Bicycle Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Cop Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Cop Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Honha Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Honha Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Precision Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Precision Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Btongint (Shenzhen) Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Btongint (Shenzhen) Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huidong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huidong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tianyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tianyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Zhixia Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Zhixia Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Jiahua Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Jiahua Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huafeng Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huafeng Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Allspark Auto Parts (Changzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Allspark Auto Parts (Changzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Danyang Crocs Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Danyang Crocs Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Benke Auto Parts Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Benke Auto Parts Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Aoyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Aoyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huzhou Dayou Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huzhou Dayou Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Taixing Aisi Refrigeatiron Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taixing Aisi Refrigeatiron Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinzhou Tiegong Railway Maintenance Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinzhou Tiegong Railway Maintenance Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Anpin Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Anpin Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Jiubang Construction Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Jiubang Construction Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Superb International Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Superb International Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Youzhu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Youzhu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Large Horse Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Large Horse Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meifei Building Materials (Hebei) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meifei Building Materials (Hebei) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Hualun Guanse Decoration Material Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Hualun Guanse Decoration Material Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dingdian Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dingdian Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newjiake (Chongqing) Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newjiake (Chongqing) Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Scaler Composite Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Scaler Composite Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huimin County Zhengang Chemical Fiber Rope Network Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huimin County Zhengang Chemical Fiber Rope Network Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Luozhuang Tongtai Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Luozhuang Tongtai Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Good Morning Fashion Accessory Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Good Morning Fashion Accessory Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jianyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jianyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yihua Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yihua Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinsheng Hardware Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinsheng Hardware Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026