Zhongshan Yibo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Zhongshan Yibo Technology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier focused on built-in microwave oven products, including white glass built-in microwave ovens, touch-control built-in microwave ovens, 60cm built-in microwave models, and multifunction convection microwave ovens. The supplier shows a relatively solid manufacturing foundation, with a reported factory area of over 10,000㎡, more than 80 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 11 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. However, recent commercial validation is limited: only 3 orders were recorded in the past six months, with CN¥405.6K+ transaction value, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. The supplier appears most suitable for buyers seeking microwave oven sourcing with customization requirements and moderate production scale, but buyers should conduct further quality, sample, and reference checks before large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis:
- Factory area: 10,000+㎡
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Guangdong, China
Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a meaningful physical manufacturing base, with a factory size exceeding 10,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 80 employees. This indicates a production setup beyond a small workshop and suggests the company has basic-to-medium scale manufacturing capacity. The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence that the company has undergone some form of platform-related verification.
Scoring Rationale:
The company does not reach the profile of a very large-scale factory based on the available employee count, but the reported factory area and verified supplier status support a stable mid-sized manufacturing assessment. The data is sufficient to confirm operational presence and basic production capability, though there is no detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, or factory audit reports.
Final Score: 16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization, Minor Customization
Elaboration:
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 11 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related labels improves platform credibility, especially for buyers requiring private-label or product adaptation services.
Scoring Rationale:
The long Gold Supplier duration and Trade Assurance support represent strong platform credibility. The certification and service labels are relatively complete from a platform perspective. However, the provided data does not include internationally recognized product certifications or detailed factory audit documentation, so the score should remain slightly below the maximum.
Final Score: 19 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 3
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥405.6K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded commercial activity in the past six months, with CN¥405.6K+ in transaction value. However, the order count is low at only 3 orders, and there are no customer reviews available. The absence of store rating data limits the ability to assess buyer satisfaction and transaction consistency.
Scoring Rationale:
The transaction amount suggests some recent business activity, but the low order count and lack of reviews significantly weaken commercial validation. Since store rating is unavailable and review count is 0, the supplier cannot be considered strongly proven by marketplace performance. The business performance is therefore assessed as low-to-moderate rather than strong.
Final Score: 11 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis:
- Response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The availability of Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service suggests the supplier can support buyers with customized specifications or product adaptation needs.
Scoring Rationale:
Service capability is supported by customization labels and reasonable response speed. However, because the response time is not within the strongest category and there is no additional data on English communication quality, sample handling speed, engineering support, or after-sales service, the score should be positioned in the upper-middle range.
Final Score: 8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available delivery performance indicator in the provided data. This suggests that, for recorded transactions, the supplier has met delivery timing expectations.
Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. However, this should still be interpreted alongside the low number of recent orders.
Final Score: 10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- On-platform customer feedback: Insufficient Data
Elaboration:
The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection label, which indicates some level of quality control process before shipment. Verified supplier status also contributes to quality credibility. However, there is no available store rating and no customer reviews, making it difficult to evaluate real buyer satisfaction, defect rates, product consistency, or post-delivery quality performance.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, but the absence of customer feedback and store rating prevents a high score. Finished Product Inspection is positive, yet without review data or rating performance, the quality assessment remains only partially validated.
Final Score: 13 / 20
Total Score
77 / 100
Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 16 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
- Business Performance: 11 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 13 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Zhongshan Yibo Technology Co., Ltd. is conditionally recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking built-in microwave oven products with ODM, full customization, or minor customization requirements. The supplier has strong platform credibility, long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a 100.0% on-time delivery rate.
The main risks are limited recent order volume, 0 reviews, missing store rating, and insufficient customer feedback data. These gaps make it difficult to fully validate product quality consistency and buyer satisfaction. For procurement, it is advisable to begin with sample evaluation, technical specification confirmation, and small-to-medium trial orders before scaling to larger-volume purchasing.
Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential due to its manufacturing base, customization capability, and platform credibility, but commercial and quality validation should be strengthened before strategic sourcing decisions.
Leave your comment