zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Sichuan Shengyu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Sichuan Shengyu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Sichuan, with a reported factory area of over 43,000 sqm and more than 80 staff. The company appears to focus on electric sanitation and waste-management vehicles, including electric garbage bin transport tricycles, garbage bin transfer vehicles, street-cleaning tricycles, and self-discharging electric garbage tricycles. Its product listings show low minimum order quantities of 1 piece, which may be suitable for trial orders, project-based procurement, or buyers requiring sample validation before scaling.

The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 1 year and is marked as a verified supplier, with platform labels including ODM service, minor customization, response time within 1 hour, and 100% on-time delivery. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and key business performance indicators such as recent order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer reviews are missing or unavailable. Overall, this supplier is potentially suitable for cautious trial cooperation, especially for buyers prioritizing low MOQ and fast communication, but commercial validation remains limited.

Sichuan Shengyu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Sichuan, China
- Factory area: 43,000+ sqm
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration
The supplier reports a relatively large factory area of over 43,000 sqm, which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The employee count of more than 80 staff suggests an operating team with basic to moderate production and support capacity. The verified supplier status provides some level of platform-backed credibility regarding the existence and basic profile of the business.

However, while the factory area is strong, the employee scale is not especially large compared with major industrial manufacturers. There is also no provided data on annual production capacity, equipment quantity, production lines, export volume, or factory certification details.

Scoring Rationale
The large factory area and verified supplier status support a positive assessment of company strength. However, the workforce size points more toward a medium-scale operation rather than a fully large-scale mature supply chain. Because production capacity details and factory certification specifics are not provided, the score should not reach the highest range.

Final Score
17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry labels: ODM service available, Minor customization, Response time ≤1h, On-time delivery 100.0%
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has Gold Supplier status, but the duration is only 1 year, which indicates a relatively short platform operating history. The verified supplier status strengthens credibility to some extent. The platform labels show useful operational capabilities, including ODM service, minor customization, fast response, and strong delivery performance.

However, Trade Assurance is marked as False, which reduces transaction protection for buyers. In addition, no specific third-party factory certification, product certification, compliance certificate, or industry-standard documentation is provided in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier and verified supplier status, but the short 1-year Gold Supplier history and lack of Trade Assurance limit its compliance strength. The available labels are operationally useful but do not fully replace formal compliance documentation or buyer protection mechanisms.

Final Score
13 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: Insufficient Data
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The provided data does not include recent order volume, recent transaction value, or store rating. The review count is listed as 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback record in the supplied dataset. This makes it difficult to validate actual market acceptance, repeat purchasing, buyer satisfaction, or transaction stability.

Although the supplier lists multiple electric sanitation vehicle products, the available business performance data does not demonstrate proven sales traction on the platform.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance must be assessed conservatively because the most important commercial validation indicators are missing. A review count of 0 further weakens evidence of buyer activity and customer acceptance. The supplier may still have offline or non-disclosed transactions, but such information is not provided and therefore cannot be considered.

Final Score
6 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Customization labels: ODM service available, Minor customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier shows a strong response time of within 1 hour, which is positive for communication efficiency and early-stage sourcing engagement. The presence of ODM service and minor customization indicates that the supplier can support some level of product adaptation or design-related cooperation.

However, the data does not state that Full Customization is available. Therefore, customization capability should be viewed as moderate rather than advanced.

Scoring Rationale
The fast response time supports a high service score. The supplier also provides ODM and minor customization capabilities, which are useful for buyers with project-specific requirements. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier does not fully meet the strongest service capability criteria.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided. This suggests reliable shipment execution based on the available platform label.

However, the data does not include the number of orders behind this delivery rate. Therefore, while the rate itself is excellent, the statistical depth of this performance indicator cannot be verified from the supplied information.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension, while noting that order-volume context is unavailable.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / verified supplier status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some basic confidence in its company profile. However, there is no store rating, no customer review base, and no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection. With 0 reviews, buyer satisfaction and product quality consistency cannot be validated through customer feedback.

The absence of quality-control indicators is particularly important because the listed products are electric vehicles for sanitation and waste-management applications, where performance reliability, safety, and after-sales support can be important procurement considerations. However, no additional quality documentation is provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status prevents the score from falling to the lowest level, but the lack of rating, customer reviews, and finished product inspection data significantly limits quality assurance visibility. The score reflects basic supplier verification but insufficient customer-backed quality evidence.

Final Score
10 / 20

Total Score

64 / 100

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 13 / 20
Business Performance 6 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 10 / 20
Total 64 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for trial-stage procurement, sample orders, or small project-based sourcing, rather than immediate large-scale purchasing.

This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking electric sanitation vehicles, garbage-bin transport tricycles, or street-cleaning electric tricycles with low MOQ requirements and fast supplier response. The 1-piece MOQ and response time within 1 hour are favorable for early evaluation.

Key risks include insufficient commercial validation, 0 customer reviews, missing store rating, missing recent order and transaction data, no Trade Assurance, and insufficient disclosed quality-control information such as Finished Product Inspection. These gaps mean buyers should verify product specifications, production capacity, warranty terms, inspection procedures, and delivery records before placing larger orders.

Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s large reported factory area, verified supplier status, ODM availability, and strong on-time delivery rate. However, the supplier needs stronger transaction history, customer feedback, and quality documentation to be considered a lower-risk long-term procurement partner.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Sichuan Xuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Taishenglan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Taishenglan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Youshilihui Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Youshilihui Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Nuole Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Nuole Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Newsense New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Newsense New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Dagui Special Glass Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Dagui Special Glass Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Leton Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Leton Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Meining Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Meining Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Chuanmian Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Chuanmian Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Ronghong Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Ronghong Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Qixing Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Qixing Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Sentaiyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Sentaiyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Botong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Botong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Shuoxin Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Shuoxin Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongqi Lian (Sichuan) Coating Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongqi Lian (Sichuan) Coating Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xinyishun Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xinyishun Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Jaguar Sign Express Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Jaguar Sign Express Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Cisco Fire Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Cisco Fire Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jie Yu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jie Yu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shijiazhuang Gezi Screen Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Gezi Screen Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pakcai Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pakcai Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hanse Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hanse Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nuoxin New Materials (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nuoxin New Materials (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ruixin Non Woven Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ruixin Non Woven Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Feiyu Construction Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Feiyu Construction Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Yiwei Mechanical Seal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Yiwei Mechanical Seal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Work-Sun (Beijing) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Work-Sun (Beijing) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Aoyou Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Aoyou Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Xingshengda Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Xingshengda Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kap (Xiamen) Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kap (Xiamen) Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gongyi Sanjin Charcoal Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Gongyi Sanjin Charcoal Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Etross Telecom Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Etross Telecom Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Dabing Machinery Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Dabing Machinery Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Vit Sci & Tec Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Vit Sci & Tec Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Forever Plastics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Forever Plastics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tengda Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tengda Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longkou Forever Developed Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longkou Forever Developed Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Jiangyi Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Jiangyi Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Dongcheng Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Dongcheng Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026