zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Kap (Xiamen) Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Kap (Xiamen) Bio-Tech Co., Ltd.

Kap (Xiamen) Bio-Tech Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Kap (Xiamen) Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, offering egg-related powder products and lysozyme chloride powder, with listed products covering whole egg powder, egg yolk powder, eggshell powder, and bakery-use egg powder. Based on the provided data, the supplier has a factory area of over 1,000㎡ and is marked as a verified supplier, but employee count and detailed production capacity are not available, limiting the assessment of manufacturing scale. On , the company shows relatively solid platform credibility with 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and a 100% on-time delivery rate. Business performance appears moderate, supported by 60+ orders and CN¥2.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review base is small at only 7 reviews. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale sourcing of egg powder ingredients with platform-backed transaction protection, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity, quality systems, and compliance documentation before committing to bulk procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company Name: Kap (Xiamen) Bio-Tech Co., Ltd.
  • Country: China
  • Province: Fujian
  • Factory Area: 1,000+㎡
  • Employee Count: Insufficient Data
  • Verified Supplier / Factory Verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory area of more than 1,000㎡, indicating the presence of a physical production or operational facility. The company is also marked as a verified supplier, which provides a basic level of credibility regarding its existence and supplier status. However, the absence of employee count, production line data, annual output, or capacity utilization prevents a full assessment of its production scale and operational depth.

The listed product range is concentrated in egg-based powder ingredients and lysozyme chloride powder, suggesting a focused product portfolio rather than a broad general trading catalog. However, based strictly on the provided data, there is not enough evidence to confirm whether the company operates as a large-scale manufacturer, mid-sized factory, or specialized small-batch producer.

Scoring Rationale

The factory area of 1,000+㎡ and verified supplier status support a baseline level of production capability. However, the lack of employee data and detailed production capacity significantly limits confidence in assessing manufacturing strength. The supplier does not demonstrate the scale indicators typically associated with a large stable supply chain, such as larger factory size, workforce size, multiple production lines, or documented production volume. Therefore, it is best categorized as a small-to-medium supplier with basic verified operational capability but incomplete scale transparency.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier Duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified Supplier: True
  • Platform / Industry Tags:
  • Warranty available
  • ODM service available
  • Response time ≤2h
  • On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 3 years and supports Trade Assurance, both of which strengthen platform-level transaction credibility. Trade Assurance is particularly relevant for procurement risk control because it provides buyers with a degree of order protection within the platform framework. The verified supplier status further supports baseline credibility.

The platform tags also show several operational service indicators, including warranty availability, ODM service availability, response time within 2 hours, and 100% on-time delivery. These tags are useful from a procurement screening perspective, although they do not replace product-specific certifications, food safety certifications, or third-party compliance documentation. No explicit food-grade, quality management, or regulatory certifications were provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a relatively complete platform credibility profile: Gold Supplier status, 3-year membership duration, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. However, 3 years is a moderate rather than long Gold Supplier history, and the data does not include detailed compliance certifications or complete certification documentation. The platform credibility is stronger than basic, but not sufficient to classify the supplier as having a fully mature, long-term verified compliance system.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in Past 6 Months: 60+
  • Transaction Value in Past 6 Months: CN¥2.6M+
  • Store Rating: 4.8
  • Number of Reviews: 7

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 60 orders in the past six months, with a transaction value exceeding CN¥2.6M. This indicates active commercial performance and shows that the supplier has achieved measurable transaction volume on the platform. The order count and transaction value suggest that the supplier is not inactive or untested.

The store rating of 4.8 is positive, indicating generally favorable buyer feedback. However, the number of reviews is only 7, which is relatively limited. A small review base reduces the statistical reliability of the rating and makes it harder to determine whether the performance is consistently strong across a broad buyer population.

Scoring Rationale

Business performance is supported by moderate order volume and a meaningful transaction amount over the last six months. The CN¥2.6M+ transaction value is a positive signal for commercial activity, and 60+ orders suggest recurring buyer engagement. However, the limited number of reviews prevents the supplier from being rated in the highest performance tier. The data supports a conclusion of stable medium-level business activity, but not high-volume, widely validated marketplace performance.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication Response Time: ≤2h
  • ODM Service Available: Yes, based on platform tag
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Warranty Available: Yes, based on platform tag

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time is within 2 hours, which is a positive service indicator and suggests acceptable communication efficiency for online procurement inquiries. The availability of ODM service indicates that the supplier may support some level of product development or customization cooperation. Warranty availability also provides a basic post-transaction service signal.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. ODM service and Full Customization are not identical, and the provided information does not specify packaging customization, formulation customization, labeling, private label support, or technical development scope. Therefore, customization capability should be treated as partially supported but not fully verified.

Scoring Rationale

The response time of ≤2h is good, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1h. ODM availability supports a reasonable service capability score, but the absence of confirmed Full Customization data limits the evaluation. The supplier appears service-responsive and capable of some customization-related support, but the level of customization depth requires buyer confirmation.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-Time Delivery Rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the provided dataset. This suggests that, for recorded platform transactions, the supplier has maintained timely shipment performance.

No additional data was provided regarding average lead time, production cycle, logistics options, export experience, or late shipment dispute history. Therefore, the delivery assessment is based strictly on the on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate supports the maximum score within this dimension. While broader logistics data is unavailable, the specific delivery metric provided is excellent.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store Rating: 4.8
  • Number of Reviews: 7
  • Verified Supplier / Factory Verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Product Scope: Egg powder products and lysozyme chloride powder

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.8 store rating, which indicates positive customer feedback. However, the review count is only 7, which limits confidence in the representativeness of the rating. A high rating with a small review base is useful but not as strong as a high rating supported by a large number of verified reviews.

The supplier is marked as verified, which provides some credibility from a supplier verification perspective. However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, food safety certifications, quality management certifications, laboratory testing, batch traceability, or regulatory compliance documentation. Given that the listed products are food-related ingredients, the absence of detailed quality assurance information is an important procurement risk factor.

Scoring Rationale

The positive 4.8 rating and verified supplier status justify a score above the basic level. However, the small number of reviews and lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection or quality certification data prevent a higher score. The supplier shows acceptable early-stage quality credibility, but the quality assurance system is not sufficiently documented in the provided data.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14 / 20
Total Score 75 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation

Conditionally Recommended for Cooperation

Kap (Xiamen) Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. can be considered for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking egg powder-related ingredients through with Trade Assurance support. The supplier shows reasonable platform credibility, moderate recent transaction performance, fast response time, and excellent reported on-time delivery.

Suitable Customer Types

This supplier is most suitable for:
- Small to medium-sized buyers sourcing egg powder products
- Buyers requiring Trade Assurance protection
- Importers or distributors conducting trial orders before scaling volume
- Buyers interested in ODM-supported product cooperation, subject to further confirmation

Key Risk Points

  • Employee count is not provided, limiting assessment of production scale.
  • Production capacity is not disclosed, making it difficult to evaluate suitability for large-volume supply.
  • Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed.
  • Only 7 reviews are available, so the 4.8 rating has limited statistical reliability.
  • Food safety or quality certifications are not provided in the dataset.
  • Full Customization capability is not confirmed, although ODM service is listed.

Growth Potential

The supplier demonstrates growth potential due to its active recent transaction value of CN¥2.6M+, 60+ orders in six months, 3-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and 100% on-time delivery rate. If the supplier can provide stronger documentation on production capacity, food-grade compliance, inspection procedures, and quality certifications, it may become more suitable for larger and more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Xi'An Yanhao Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Yanhao Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinrunzi Bio-Tech Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinrunzi Bio-Tech Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Faitury Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Faitury Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Honghao Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Honghao Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prb Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prb Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Fsfm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Fsfm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hq Mount Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hq Mount Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Tianxingjian Natural Bio-Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Tianxingjian Natural Bio-Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sino-Hero(Shenzhen) Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sino-Hero(Shenzhen) Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liako Tech. Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Liako Tech. Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Navihua Auto Tech Limited Supplier Evaluation
Navihua Auto Tech Limited Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen F&Q Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen F&Q Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Ltmg Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Ltmg Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Ydstone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Ydstone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongrui Tech (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongrui Tech (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Ruikang Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Ruikang Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Nanchang Longze Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Longze Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jiesa Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jiesa Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhaosheng Education Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhaosheng Education Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Cowint New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Cowint New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tti Fiber Communication Tech. Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tti Fiber Communication Tech. Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lianrun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lianrun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Huihao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Huihao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yaqi Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yaqi Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Borui Food Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Borui Food Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Li Power (Shenzhen) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Li Power (Shenzhen) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Heng Ning New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Heng Ning New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shishi Zhengyuan Aquatic Product Science&Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shishi Zhengyuan Aquatic Product Science&Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Cathylin Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Cathylin Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Farland Beijing Electronic Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Farland Beijing Electronic Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bohao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bohao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kang Rui Ling Shu (Suzhou) Intelligent Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kang Rui Ling Shu (Suzhou) Intelligent Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Ziterlan New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Ziterlan New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinli Special Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinli Special Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Baoxing Lubricating Oil Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Baoxing Lubricating Oil Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Josson New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Josson New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026