Shaanxi Honghao Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shaanxi Honghao Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shaanxi, offering botanical extract powder products such as silymarine extract, broccoli extract, vitex chasteberry extract, and senna leaf extract. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale supplier with a factory area of 700+ sqm and 20+ staff, but it has some credibility support through verified supplier status, 15 years as an Gold Supplier, and Trade Assurance availability. Its recent business performance shows moderate transaction activity, with 80+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value over the past six months. The supplier supports customization-related services and has a response time of ≤4 hours, making it potentially suitable for buyers requiring flexible small-batch procurement. However, the on-time delivery rate of 79.5% and limited review volume indicate operational and quality validation risks. This supplier is better suited for trial orders, small-to-medium procurement, and buyers who can conduct their own quality verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shaanxi, China
- Factory area: 700+ sqm
- Employee count: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier/factory audit status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical factory presence with a stated production area of over 700 sqm and more than 20 employees. This indicates basic manufacturing or supply-chain operating capacity, but the scale is relatively small compared with larger industrial suppliers. The verified supplier status provides some support for operational credibility, although the data does not include details on production lines, annual capacity, equipment, or specific factory audit reports.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates baseline production capability and has a verified supplier indicator, which prevents it from being assessed as weak or unverified. However, the limited factory area and staff size place it closer to a small-scale supplier rather than a medium or large stable supply chain. Since no additional data is provided on production capacity, automation level, or large-scale manufacturing infrastructure, the score should remain within the “small but basic production capability” range.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 15 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization, Response time ≤4h
- Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform history, with 15 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance support is also available, which provides buyers with a platform-level transaction protection mechanism. The listed platform tags show customization and ODM service capabilities, although no formal third-party product certifications, factory certificates, or regulatory compliance certificates are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale
The long Gold Supplier duration, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status create a relatively strong platform credibility profile. The supplier has a mature platform presence and basic transaction protection mechanisms. However, the score is not maximized because the provided data does not include detailed compliance certificates, product safety certifications, or full documentation of factory audit standards.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 80+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥676.1K+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Review count: 10

Elaboration
The supplier has completed more than 80 orders over the past six months, with transaction value exceeding CN¥676.1K. This suggests active commercial operations and some level of buyer acceptance. The store rating of 4.6 is positive, but the review count is only 10, which limits the depth of public customer feedback available for assessment.

Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction value indicate a stable but not high-volume business profile. The 4.6 rating supports acceptable buyer satisfaction, but the low number of reviews weakens the reliability of the rating as a broad market signal. The supplier therefore fits the “stable medium-scale transaction” category rather than the highest performance tier.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Platform tags: Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization

Elaboration
The supplier shows service flexibility through full customization, minor customization, and ODM service availability. A response time of ≤4 hours is acceptable for B2B sourcing communication, although it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within one hour.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has clear customization-related service capability and a reasonable response time. However, since the response time is not ≤1 hour, it does not qualify for the top service capability bracket. The combination of customization support and normal communication efficiency supports an upper-mid score within this dimension.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 79.5%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 79.5%, which falls within the 70%–79% evaluation band. This suggests delivery reliability is below the preferred level for buyers requiring strict lead-time control or frequent replenishment cycles.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, a 70%–79% on-time delivery rate corresponds to 5–6 points. Since the supplier is near the upper end of this band at 79.5%, a score of 6 is appropriate. However, the rate remains below 80%, making delivery performance a key procurement risk.

Final Score
6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.6
- Review count: 10
- Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification documentation is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.6, but the total number of reviews is limited. Verified supplier status provides some quality and operational credibility, but the dataset does not include explicit Finished Product Inspection information, detailed product quality control procedures, third-party inspection records, or specific product certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The quality profile is acceptable but not fully validated. A 4.6 rating is favorable, and verified supplier status adds credibility. However, only 10 reviews are available, and there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality assurance systems. This prevents the supplier from reaching the high-quality assurance score range.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with caution, especially for trial orders, small-batch procurement, and buyers seeking botanical extract powders with customization or ODM support. The supplier has strong platform credibility, long history, Trade Assurance support, and moderate recent transaction activity.

The main risks are the small factory scale, limited customer review volume, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and a 79.5% on-time delivery rate. Buyers with strict delivery schedules, regulated product requirements, or large-volume procurement needs should conduct additional due diligence, request quality documents, confirm inspection procedures, and start with sample or pilot orders before scaling.

Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s 15-year platform presence, customization capability, and active recent transactions, but operational reliability and documented quality control need further verification.