Qianhe Condiment And Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Qianhe Condiment And Food Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Sichuan, with a reported factory area of over 360,000 m² and more than 2,800 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have substantial production scale and a verified supplier status, making it suitable for buyers seeking large-volume sourcing of Chinese rice wine and cooking wine products. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 10 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, and customization capabilities. Commercial performance shows 20+ orders and CN¥3.3M+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating active business activity, although the absence of store rating data and zero reviews limits customer feedback validation. Delivery performance is near the upper-middle range with an 89.5% on-time shipment rate. Overall, this supplier is most suitable for medium to large buyers prioritizing production scale, platform credibility, and customization support, while requiring additional quality and customer feedback verification before long-term procurement commitment.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength — 20 Points
Basis
- Country/Region: China, Sichuan
- Factory area: 360,000+ m²
- Employees: 2,800+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier reports a very large factory footprint and a workforce of more than 2,800 employees, which indicates strong production capacity and organizational scale. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its manufacturing presence. Based strictly on the provided data, this supplier is positioned as a large-scale food and condiment manufacturer rather than a small trading-oriented seller.
Scoring Rationale
The factory area and employee count are both significantly above the threshold typically associated with large-scale production capability. The presence of supplier verification also reduces uncertainty around operational existence and scale. Since the data directly supports a large and stable supply structure, the company fits the highest scoring band for Company Strength.
Final Score
20 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Minor customization, Full customization
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a long-standing presence with 10 years as a Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance. The listed platform labels include warranty availability, finished product inspection, and both minor and full customization. These indicators suggest a relatively complete platform trust framework. The verified supplier status further strengthens its platform credibility.
Scoring Rationale
A 10-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and multiple compliance-related platform labels together form a strong credibility profile. The only limitation is that no additional third-party food safety certifications or formal factory audit certificates are provided in the dataset, so the score should remain slightly below a perfect rating.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance — 20 Points
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥3.3M+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders and over CN¥3.3M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates measurable commercial activity and some degree of buyer conversion. However, the absence of store rating data and the presence of zero reviews reduce the ability to assess buyer satisfaction or repeat purchasing quality through platform feedback.
Scoring Rationale
The transaction value is relatively strong and supports a positive business performance assessment. However, the order count is moderate rather than high, and the lack of rating and review data creates a meaningful validation gap. Therefore, the supplier should be scored as having stable but not fully proven business performance.
Final Score
15 / 20
4. Service Capability — 10 Points
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
Elaboration
The supplier reports a response time within three hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency. It also supports both minor and full customization, which is important for buyers requiring private label, packaging adjustment, or product specification adaptation, within the limits of the listed product scope.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has strong customization capability, including full customization. However, the response time is not within the highest scoring threshold of one hour or less. As a result, the service capability is above average but does not reach the maximum level.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points
Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 89.5%
Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time shipment rate is 89.5%, which falls just below the 90% threshold for the highest scoring range. This suggests generally reliable delivery performance, though there remains some risk of delayed shipments, especially for buyers operating with strict replenishment schedules or time-sensitive distribution plans.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 89.5%, the supplier is very close to the 90% benchmark but still falls within the 80–89% range based on the provided value. Therefore, the upper end of this range is appropriate.
Final Score
8 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points
Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status, which are positive indicators for quality assurance. However, no store rating is provided, and the review count is zero. This means that customer-side quality feedback cannot be validated from the supplied data. The quality system appears to have basic platform-backed inspection support, but buyer satisfaction evidence is insufficient.
Scoring Rationale
The presence of Finished Product Inspection and supplier verification supports a moderate quality score. However, the absence of store rating data and zero customer reviews are significant limitations, especially for procurement teams that rely on historical buyer feedback to assess consistency. The supplier cannot be rated in the high-quality feedback band without review volume or rating evidence.
Final Score
13 / 20
Total Score
83 / 100
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 20 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 19 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 15 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 8 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 13 / 20 |
| Total | 83 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Qianhe Condiment And Food Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for medium to large buyers seeking Chinese rice wine or cooking wine products from a large-scale supplier with strong platform credibility and customization capability.
The supplier is suitable for: - Buyers requiring large production capacity and stable supply potential - Importers or distributors sourcing Chinese rice wine and cooking wine products - Buyers needing Trade Assurance and platform-backed transaction protection - Customers requiring minor or full customization based on listed platform capability
Main risks: - Store rating is not provided - Review count is 0, limiting customer feedback validation - On-time shipment rate is 89.5%, slightly below the highest reliability band - No additional food safety certificates are provided in the supplied data
Growth potential is strong due to the supplier’s large factory scale, long Gold Supplier history, verified status, transaction value, and customization capability. Before placing large or long-term orders, buyers should request product samples, confirm quality inspection procedures, verify relevant food compliance documents, and clarify delivery timelines contractually.
Leave your comment