Fuzhou Xiangtai Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Fuzhou Xiangtai Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, offering TPU films, TPU-coated nylon, ripstop woven fabric, and related waterproof or weldable textile materials. Based on the provided data, the company shows moderate production strength with a factory area of 7,300+㎡, 80+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its strongest advantage is platform credibility: it has 19 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and shows platform tags including response time within 4 hours and 100% on-time delivery. Business performance appears limited but present, with 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value in the past six months. However, store rating is not provided and the review count is 0, which limits customer feedback validation. This supplier is more suitable for buyers seeking verified platform-backed sourcing, small-to-medium trial orders, and textile/TPU material procurement, while buyers requiring strong public customer feedback or documented inspection systems should conduct further due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 7,300+㎡
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory or audit details beyond verified supplier status: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a documented physical operation with a factory area above 7,300㎡ and more than 80 employees. This indicates a functioning production or supply operation with basic organizational capacity. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has passed some level of platform or supplier verification. However, the provided data does not include production lines, monthly capacity, machinery details, export volume, or specific factory audit reports.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier fits the profile of a small-to-medium stable supplier rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The factory size and staff count suggest meaningful operating capacity, but not enough evidence is available to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain. Verified supplier status supports credibility, but lack of detailed production capacity limits the score.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 19 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Additional formal product or system certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The company has a long platform history, with 19 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a strong credibility indicator within the platform environment. Trade Assurance support also improves buyer protection for transaction security. The available platform tags confirm operational service and delivery indicators, although they do not represent formal compliance certifications such as ISO, OEKO-TEX, food-contact certification, or product testing standards.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs strongly in platform credibility due to its long Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance availability. However, because no formal compliance certificates or third-party product certifications are provided, the score should not reach the absolute top range.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 10+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded transactions in the past six months, showing that it is commercially active on the platform. However, the volume is relatively modest, with only 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews reduce the visibility of buyer satisfaction and repeat purchasing evidence.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some commercial validation, but the order count and transaction value are not high. Since customer rating data is missing and reviews are absent, the business performance cannot be considered strongly proven. The score reflects low-to-moderate transaction activity with limited public buyer feedback.

Final Score
11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
- Other service indicators: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for sourcing inquiries. This is useful for buyers requiring quotation follow-up, sample discussions, or order coordination. However, there is no provided evidence of Full Customization, OEM/ODM support, sample development capability, technical consultation, or dedicated account service.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates a reasonable response standard, but not the strongest service profile. Since response time is not within 1 hour and customization capability is not confirmed, the score falls into the normal service range rather than the high-service category.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available operational delivery indicator in the provided data. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance for recorded platform transactions. No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, shipping methods, urgent order handling, or historical delivery dispute rates.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives a top score in this dimension, while recognizing that the order base appears limited.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / verified supplier status: True
- On-time delivery: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some baseline confidence in company legitimacy. However, quality and customer feedback data is weak. No store rating is available, the review count is 0, and there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, quality control procedures, test reports, or product certifications. For TPU films and coated textile materials, buyers may need additional quality documentation before placing larger orders.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic verification, but the lack of public customer reviews, missing store rating, and absence of documented inspection systems significantly limit quality assurance visibility. The score reflects insufficient customer feedback and limited quality system evidence rather than confirmed poor quality.

Final Score
10 / 20

Total Score

71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with caution, especially for small-to-medium trial orders, sample-based evaluation, or buyers sourcing TPU films and coated textile materials through Trade Assurance. The supplier’s main strengths are long platform history, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, acceptable response speed, and excellent reported on-time delivery. The main risks are limited recent transaction volume, 0 reviews, missing store rating, and insufficient data on quality inspection systems or formal product certifications. Growth potential exists if the supplier can provide stronger quality documentation, customer feedback records, inspection reports, and customization capability evidence.