Fuzhou High Tech Zone Qianzimao Clothing Business Department Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Fuzhou High Tech Zone Qianzimao Clothing Business Department is a China-based headwear supplier located in Fujian, with a reported factory area of 600+ sqm and 30+ staff. The company focuses on cap and hat products, including OEM headwear, A-frame/K-frame two-tone caps, golf performance baseball hats, perforated curved-brim caps, and outdoor sports caps. Its product listings show low minimum order quantities of 25 pieces, making it suitable for small-batch customization buyers, emerging brands, promotional merchandise buyers, and customers testing new designs.
The supplier has 4 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Business performance is relatively strong, with 200+ orders and CN¥1.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating and 80+ reviews. Quality-related platform tags include Finished Product Inspection and ODM service availability. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ headwear sourcing with moderate factory scale and verified platform credibility.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Fujian, China
- Factory area: 600+ sqm
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope: headwear and cap products
Elaboration
The supplier shows a relatively compact but established production profile. A 600+ sqm factory and 30+ employees indicate a small-to-medium operational scale rather than a large industrial manufacturing base. The company appears focused on headwear categories, including cotton caps, golf hats, perforated caps, and outdoor sports caps, which suggests category specialization within caps and headwear.
The verified supplier status provides some support for factory legitimacy, but the available data does not include detailed factory audit reports, annual production capacity, machinery count, production lines, or export market coverage. Therefore, while the company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability, the production scale cannot be classified as large based on the provided information.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has clear factory data, employee data, and verified supplier status, which supports a positive assessment of operational stability. However, the factory size and staffing level are moderate, and there is no data showing large-scale production infrastructure or advanced factory certifications beyond verification. This places the company above a basic small workshop but below a large-scale stable supply chain.
Final Score
14 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available
Elaboration
The supplier has a solid platform credibility profile. Four years as a Gold Supplier indicates a meaningful operating history on the platform, though it is not a very long tenure compared with suppliers with longer-established marketplace records. Trade Assurance support is important for procurement risk control, as it gives buyers a platform-backed transaction mechanism.
The supplier also carries several relevant operational tags, including Finished Product Inspection and ODM service availability. These tags support the supplier’s credibility in customization and quality-control-related processes. However, the provided data does not include external management system certifications, product compliance certificates, factory audit names, or third-party certification documents.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, 4-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The certification tag set is useful but not fully comprehensive. Since no detailed third-party factory audit, ISO certification, product compliance certificate, or export compliance documentation is provided, the score should remain in the strong but not top-tier range.
Final Score
16 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.6M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 80+
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates active commercial performance on the platform. More than 200 orders in the past six months indicates steady buyer activity, while CN¥1.6M+ in transaction value suggests that the supplier has achieved a meaningful level of recent sales. The 4.9 store rating is strong and indicates generally positive customer satisfaction.
The number of reviews, 80+, provides useful customer feedback evidence, although it is not extremely large. The available data confirms recent order flow and transaction value, but it does not include repeat purchase rate, buyer country distribution, order cancellation rate, dispute rate, or customer segment information.
Scoring Rationale
The combination of 200+ recent orders, CN¥1.6M+ transaction value, a 4.9 rating, and 80+ reviews supports a strong business performance score. The supplier shows active market validation and relatively high buyer satisfaction. However, the review base is moderate rather than extensive, and the dataset lacks deeper commercial indicators such as repeat buyers or dispute history. Therefore, the supplier fits the upper-middle to strong performance category.
Final Score
17 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Response time: ≤3h
- Customization-related tags: Low MOQ for customization, ODM service available
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing. It is not at the highest service level defined by response within one hour, but it still reflects a reasonably responsive sales operation.
The supplier has tags indicating Low MOQ for customization and ODM service availability. This is useful for buyers requiring flexible product development or small-batch branded headwear. However, the provided data does not explicitly state Full Customization support, nor does it describe design support, sample lead time, artwork handling, packaging customization, or dedicated account management.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows practical service capability through a reasonable response time and customization-related platform tags. The 25-piece MOQ across listed products further supports flexibility for smaller buyers. However, because response time is not within one hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be considered good but not premium.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time shipping rate: 90.4%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time shipping rate of 90.4% is above the 90% benchmark and indicates generally reliable delivery execution. This is a positive indicator for buyers who require predictable fulfillment, especially for promotional, seasonal, or retail launch timelines.
However, the provided data does not include average production lead time, sample lead time, logistics options, historical delay causes, peak-season capacity, or order-size-specific delivery performance. Therefore, the assessment can only be based on the on-time shipping rate.
Scoring Rationale
With an on-time shipping rate above 90%, the supplier meets the highest defined delivery performance bracket. The score is strong, although not perfect, because the rate is only slightly above the 90% threshold and no additional delivery reliability data is provided.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 80+
- Finished Product Inspection: Yes, listed as platform tag
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided; detailed factory verification report: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong customer-facing quality signal through its 4.9 store rating. The 80+ reviews provide a moderate feedback base and support the credibility of the rating. The Finished Product Inspection tag is also important, as it indicates that the supplier has a stated inspection process for completed goods.
Verified supplier status further strengthens the quality assurance profile, but the available data does not include detailed inspection standards, AQL level, defect rate, product testing records, material certificates, or third-party audit reports. Therefore, the supplier’s quality profile is positive but not fully documented.
Scoring Rationale
The high store rating and presence of Finished Product Inspection support a strong quality and customer feedback score. The review count is meaningful but not large enough to classify the supplier as having extensive customer validation. Since detailed quality control documentation and factory verification reports are not provided, the score should remain in the strong but not top-tier range.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
79 / 100
Score Breakdown:
- Company Strength: 14 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
- Business Performance: 17 / 20
- Service Capability: 7 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Recommended for conditional cooperation.
Fuzhou High Tech Zone Qianzimao Clothing Business Department is suitable for buyers seeking headwear sourcing with low MOQ, ODM availability, moderate customization flexibility, and verified transaction protection. It is especially appropriate for small to mid-sized brands, promotional product buyers, e-commerce sellers, and customers testing new cap designs before scaling order volume.
Key strengths include 4 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 200+ orders in the past six months, CN¥1.6M+ recent transaction value, a 4.9 rating, Finished Product Inspection, and a 90.4% on-time shipping rate.
Main risks include limited factory scale, absence of detailed factory audit data, insufficient information on Full Customization, no disclosed production capacity, and no provided product compliance certificates or third-party quality reports.
Growth potential is positive for small-batch and mid-volume headwear programs, but buyers should request samples, confirm customization scope, verify inspection standards, and clarify lead times before placing larger orders.
Leave your comment