zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Xinyu Yushui High-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Xinyu Yushui High-Tech Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangxi, with a reported factory area of 23,000+㎡ and 210+ staff. Based on the provided product data, the company focuses on thermal paper rolls, receipt rolls, and adhesive sticker labels, with MOQ levels ranging from 10 rolls to 1,000 rolls depending on product type. The supplier demonstrates solid platform credibility through 7 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and platform tags including Finished Product Inspection, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. Commercial performance is supported by CN¥19.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, though order volume and review count remain moderate. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established thermal paper or receipt roll suppliers with verified platform backing, stable delivery performance, and basic customization capability.

Xinyu Yushui High-Tech Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Xinyu Yushui High-Tech Co., Ltd.
  • Country/region: China, Jiangxi Province
  • Factory area: 23,000+㎡
  • Employees: 210+ staff
  • Verified/audited supplier: True
  • Product scope provided: thermal paper rolls, receipt rolls, adhesive sticker labels

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively substantial factory footprint of over 23,000㎡ and more than 210 employees, indicating a structured manufacturing operation rather than a small trading setup. The product range shown is concentrated around thermal paper and label-related consumables, which suggests a focused production category. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational existence and basic factory capability.

However, the provided data does not include detailed annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment list, daily/monthly output, or specific factory management certifications. Therefore, while the available indicators support a stable mid-sized manufacturing profile, the data is not sufficient to classify the company as a fully large-scale supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates clear manufacturing strength through its factory area, employee base, and verified supplier status. These are strong indicators of basic production stability and organizational scale. Nevertheless, because production capacity and detailed factory certification information are not provided, the score should remain within the upper-middle range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification/platform tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • Minor customization
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 7 years, which is a meaningful indicator of platform continuity. Trade Assurance support improves transactional security for buyers by providing a platform-backed purchasing mechanism. The verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility, indicating that the supplier has passed at least a basic verification process.

The available tags also show some compliance and service-related capability, especially Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. However, the data does not provide independent international certifications, such as ISO, FSC, RoHS, REACH, or other product-specific compliance documents. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but broader compliance depth cannot be fully confirmed from the supplied information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong platform profile due to 7 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These factors place it above suppliers with only basic platform presence. The lack of detailed third-party compliance certifications prevents a perfect score, but the platform-backed credibility is still highly favorable.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 40+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥19.6M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong transaction value over the last six months, with CN¥19.6M+ reported. This indicates that buyers have placed meaningful commercial orders rather than only sample-level transactions. The 4.9 store rating is also positive and suggests buyer satisfaction among the available reviewers.

However, the order count of 40+ over six months is moderate rather than very high, and the review count of 10+ is relatively limited. This means the commercial validation is supported more by transaction value than by broad buyer feedback volume. The limited number of reviews reduces the statistical depth of customer validation.

Scoring Rationale

The high transaction amount is a strong positive factor and suggests proven sales activity. The store rating is also favorable. However, the order count and review count are not large enough to justify a top-tier business performance score. The supplier fits the profile of a commercially active and stable supplier with moderate public buyer validation.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤6h
  • Customization-related tags:
  • Minor customization
  • ODM service available
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data / Not indicated in provided data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 6 hours is acceptable for international sourcing communication, though it is not at the fastest level. The presence of Minor Customization and ODM service availability indicates that the supplier can support some level of tailored product requirements or development-based cooperation.

However, Full Customization is not explicitly stated in the provided data. Since the scoring standard gives higher marks to suppliers with response time within 1 hour and strong full customization capability, this supplier cannot be placed in the top service tier based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has reasonable responsiveness and some customization capability, but the response time is not within 1 hour and Full Customization is not confirmed. Therefore, the service capability is solid but not exceptional.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 95.6%

Elaboration

An on-time delivery rate of 95.6% is a strong delivery performance indicator. It exceeds the 90% threshold defined for the highest scoring band. This suggests that the supplier has demonstrated reliable shipment execution on the platform.

No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, logistics partners, peak-season delivery stability, or late shipment handling procedures. Therefore, while the on-time delivery rate is strong, the evaluation is limited to this single delivery metric.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance band. A score slightly below perfect is reasonable because detailed delivery lead-time data and broader logistics performance records are not provided.

Final Score

9.5 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 10+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified/audited supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes
  • Specific product quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive quality and customer satisfaction indicator. Finished Product Inspection is also listed, suggesting that some form of final quality control process is available before shipment. Warranty availability provides an additional layer of buyer assurance.

However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which limits the depth of customer feedback analysis. The data also does not include detailed inspection standards, defect rate, quality control workflow, third-party inspection records, or product-specific certifications. As a result, the supplier shows good quality assurance signals, but the evidence base is not comprehensive enough for a top-tier score.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of a high rating, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status supports a strong quality profile. The main limitation is the relatively low review volume and absence of detailed quality certification or inspection documentation. Therefore, the score falls in the strong but not maximum range.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9.5 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20

Final Total Score: 84.5 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, preferably starting with controlled trial orders or phased procurement.

Xinyu Yushui High-Tech Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing thermal paper rolls, receipt rolls, and adhesive sticker labels who require a verified supplier with stable platform credibility, good delivery performance, and moderate customization capability. The supplier is particularly appropriate for importers, distributors, retail consumable buyers, and businesses seeking regular replenishment of paper roll products.

Suitable Customer Types

  • Buyers needing thermal paper rolls or receipt rolls
  • Distributors seeking a supplier with verified platform history
  • Customers requiring Trade Assurance-supported transactions
  • Buyers needing minor customization or ODM support
  • Procurement teams prioritizing delivery reliability and platform credibility

Main Risk Points

  • Review count is relatively limited at 10+, reducing the depth of customer feedback validation.
  • Full Customization is not confirmed in the provided data.
  • Specific international product certifications are not provided.
  • Production capacity, equipment details, and monthly output are not available.
  • Response time is acceptable but not highly responsive compared with suppliers replying within 1 hour.

Growth Potential

The supplier shows good growth potential based on its 23,000+㎡ factory area, 210+ staff, 7-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥19.6M+ six-month transaction value, and 95.6% on-time delivery rate. If the supplier can provide more detailed production capacity data, stronger certification documentation, and broader customer feedback, it could become a stronger candidate for larger-volume and longer-term procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Huazhao High-Tech (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huazhao High-Tech (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhuopin High-Tech Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhuopin High-Tech Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou High Tech Zone Qianzimao Clothing Business Department Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou High Tech Zone Qianzimao Clothing Business Department Supplier Evaluation
Xinyu Shanlong Strip Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinyu Shanlong Strip Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Asia Fuji Changlin Elevator (Xinyu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Asia Fuji Changlin Elevator (Xinyu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luohe High Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luohe High Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
High Grade (Tianjin) Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
High Grade (Tianjin) Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuzhou Hechuang Medium-High Frequency Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuzhou Hechuang Medium-High Frequency Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liako Tech. Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Liako Tech. Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Navihua Auto Tech Limited Supplier Evaluation
Navihua Auto Tech Limited Supplier Evaluation
Chongrui Tech (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongrui Tech (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jqmaterial Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jqmaterial Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang U Tech Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang U Tech Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Center Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Center Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Zhongzhirun Steel Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Zhongzhirun Steel Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Foshan Heyang Electrical Appliances Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Heyang Electrical Appliances Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Esino Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Esino Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Xinming Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Xinming Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hinchytek Optoelectronics (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hinchytek Optoelectronics (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sway Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sway Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Trb Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Trb Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Towin Clamp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Towin Clamp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenze Jiamei Screen Printing Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenze Jiamei Screen Printing Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Recycle Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Recycle Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Minglian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Minglian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing New Zhaogy Tech. Dev. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing New Zhaogy Tech. Dev. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Jingyang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Jingyang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lewei (Jiaxing) Smart Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lewei (Jiaxing) Smart Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aim Magnet Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aim Magnet Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Gelee Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Gelee Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi City Mayee Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi City Mayee Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Henry Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Henry Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Abis Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Abis Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tomark (Xiangyang) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tomark (Xiangyang) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026