Shenzhen Longgang District Jiaqumao Electronic Factory(Individual Business) Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Longgang District Jiaqumao Electronic Factory (Individual Business) is a Guangdong, China-based electronics supplier focused on wireless charging-related products, including magnetic wireless chargers, fast charging wireless products, cartoon-design chargers, mobile phone charging products, and wireless car charger mounts. Based on the provided data, the supplier operates from a factory area of 3,200+ m² with 80+ staff and is listed as a verified supplier, indicating a basic-to-mid scale production setup rather than a large industrial-scale operation. On -related credibility indicators, the company shows solid platform backing, including 4 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and service/quality tags such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Commercial performance is relatively strong, with 200+ orders and CN¥4M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 50+ reviews. This supplier appears suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ wireless charging products with customization options, while larger enterprise buyers should further verify production capacity, compliance certifications, and quality control depth.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 3,200+ m²
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory audit or specific factory certification details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with a 3,200+ m² facility and more than 80 employees. This indicates that the company has an established manufacturing operation rather than functioning only as a trading entity. The employee count and factory size suggest a small-to-medium production scale, adequate for regular wholesale orders and flexible product handling, especially given the low minimum order quantities listed across multiple products.

However, the available information does not provide details on specific factory audit reports, ISO certifications, electronics compliance certifications, production lines, monthly capacity, or equipment scale. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates real factory presence and basic production strength, the data does not support classifying it as a large-scale or highly certified manufacturing base.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves a mid-level score because it has verifiable factory indicators, including factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. The 3,200+ m² facility and 80+ staff show operational stability, but the scale is not large enough to support a top-tier score under the “large-scale stable supply chain” category. The absence of detailed audit records, factory certifications, production capacity figures, and equipment information limits confidence in its ability to handle very large or technically demanding programs.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization
- Factory or supplier verification: Verified supplier marked as True
- Specific third-party compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a solid platform credibility profile. A 4-year Gold Supplier history indicates a reasonable operating period on the platform, though it is not yet a long-tenured supplier compared with companies that have 8–10+ years of platform history. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection and improves buyer confidence, especially for international procurement.

The presence of Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization tags strengthens its platform profile by showing both service capability and some quality-control-related process visibility. However, the data does not include detailed certification documents, such as ISO, CE, FCC, RoHS, or other electronics-related compliance records. Therefore, compliance credibility is strong at the platform level but not fully validated from a regulatory or technical certification perspective.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core trust elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and multiple capability tags. These factors justify a score in the upper-middle range. The 4-year Gold Supplier duration is credible but not long enough for the highest score band. In addition, the absence of detailed third-party compliance certificates prevents the supplier from being rated as having a complete compliance system.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥4M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 50+

Elaboration
The supplier shows meaningful recent commercial activity. More than 200 orders over six months indicates consistent buyer engagement, while CN¥4M+ in transaction value reflects a notable transaction scale for the listed product category. The store rating of 4.7 is positive and suggests generally satisfactory buyer experiences.

The review count of 50+ provides some level of customer feedback validation, although it is not a very large review base. The combination of order volume, transaction amount, and rating supports the view that the supplier has active market traction and is not an untested seller. However, the available data does not include repeat purchase rate, buyer geography, major customer types, dispute rate, or refund information, so deeper business stability cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier’s 200+ orders and CN¥4M+ transaction volume over six months represent stable and commercially meaningful performance. The 4.7 rating is favorable, and 50+ reviews provide moderate validation. This supports a score above the medium range. However, the review quantity is not high enough to fully confirm broad market acceptance, and missing data on repeat customers, complaint rates, and buyer composition prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score
17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
- Detailed communication quality metrics: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates good service capability through multiple customization-related tags, including Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. This is valuable for buyers looking for branded, design-adjusted, or product-adapted wireless charging solutions. The low MOQs shown across the product listings, ranging from 1 to 5 pieces, also suggest flexibility for sample orders, small-batch testing, or initial procurement validation.

The stated response time of ≤4 hours is acceptable for cross-border communication, though it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. The data does not include response rate, quotation speed, engineering support level, language capability, or after-sales handling process. Therefore, the supplier appears service-capable, but not enough information is available to rate it at the highest level.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier supports several customization formats, including Full Customization and ODM service, which strengthens its service score. The ≤4h response time is reasonable but not exceptional. Since the highest score range requires response within one hour plus strong customization capability, this supplier fits more appropriately into the good-but-not-top service category.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 96.1%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 96.1% is strong and falls above the 90% threshold. This indicates reliable delivery execution based on the provided platform metric. For buyers sourcing wireless charging products, delivery consistency is important because product launches, promotional cycles, and inventory planning can be affected by shipment delays.

No additional logistics data is provided, such as average lead time, production cycle, shipping methods, export documentation capability, or delay dispute history. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the reported on-time dispatch performance.

Scoring Rationale
A 96.1% on-time delivery rate qualifies for the highest scoring band under the provided criteria. While supporting logistics details are not available, the reported delivery metric itself is strong enough to justify a near-top score.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 50+
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Detailed quality certifications or inspection reports: Insufficient Data
- Return rate, defect rate, or complaint rate: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive quality and feedback profile based on the available platform data. A 4.7 store rating indicates generally favorable customer satisfaction, and 50+ reviews provide a moderate level of buyer feedback. The Finished Product Inspection tag is a meaningful quality-related indicator, suggesting that completed goods are subject to some form of inspection before shipment.

However, the quality evidence is not comprehensive. The data does not include detailed inspection standards, AQL levels, defect rate, warranty terms, return rate, customer complaint patterns, or third-party product certifications. For wireless charging products, technical compliance and safety-related certifications may be important depending on the destination market, but such information is not provided. Therefore, quality confidence is positive but not fully validated.

Scoring Rationale
The 4.7 rating, 50+ reviews, Finished Product Inspection tag, and verified supplier status support a solid quality score. However, the review base is moderate rather than extensive, and the lack of detailed quality documentation or product compliance certifications prevents the supplier from reaching the highest score band. The score reflects good platform-level quality feedback with some remaining verification requirements.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

Company Strength: 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
Business Performance: 17 / 20
Service Capability: 8 / 10
Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20

Total Score: 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled qualification steps. The supplier shows a solid overall profile, supported by verified supplier status, 4 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, 200+ recent orders, CN¥4M+ transaction value, a 4.7 store rating, and a strong 96.1% on-time delivery rate.

This supplier is most suitable for small to mid-sized buyers, e-commerce sellers, promotional product buyers, and brands seeking low-MOQ wireless charging products with customization or ODM support. It may also be suitable for sample testing and small-batch market validation due to the low MOQs listed.

The main risks are insufficient data on formal product certifications, factory audit details, production capacity, defect rate, compliance documentation, and detailed quality-control procedures. For larger orders or regulated markets, buyers should request product test reports, compliance certificates, inspection standards, sample validation, and written quality agreements before scaling procurement.

The supplier’s growth potential is positive based on its recent transaction volume, customization capability, and delivery performance. With stronger certification transparency and more detailed quality documentation, it could become a more reliable option for larger-volume or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.