Yuzhou Weiqi Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Yuzhou Weiqi Hair Products Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Yuzhou Weiqi Hair Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based hair products supplier located in Henan, with a reported workforce of 50+ staff and verified supplier status. The company operates on as a 5-year Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, giving it a relatively solid platform credibility profile. Its business performance is strong, with 2,000+ orders and CN¥5.7M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 500+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking human hair extensions, Cambodian hair bundles, Burmese curly crochet hair, and related low-MOQ products. However, factory area information is not provided, and there is no explicit data confirming Full Customization or Finished Product Inspection. Overall, this supplier shows strong commercial validation and delivery reliability, but buyers should verify production capacity, quality inspection processes, and customization scope before larger-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Final Score: 13 / 20

Basis

• Company name: Yuzhou Weiqi Hair Products Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Province: Henan
• Factory area: Insufficient Data
• Employees: 50+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported workforce of more than 50 staff, indicating that it has a basic operational team and is not a purely micro-scale trading presence based on the available data. The verified supplier status provides some support for its legitimacy and operational existence. However, the factory area is not disclosed, and there is no detailed information about production lines, monthly output, machinery, warehouse capacity, or internal production structure.

The product portfolio shown includes several human hair-related items, including crochet human hair extensions, Cambodian virgin hair, raw Cambodian hair bundles, and single hair bundles. This suggests a focused product direction within the hair products category, but the data does not confirm the actual production scale behind these listings.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic production and supply capability through its 50+ staff and verified supplier status. However, because factory size and detailed production capacity are not provided, it cannot be classified as a large-scale or fully transparent manufacturing operation. The available data supports a judgment of a small to lower-medium supplier with basic production or supply capability, rather than a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Final Score: 18 / 20

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Business procurement
• Warranty available
• Low MOQ for customization

Elaboration

The supplier has been listed as an Gold Supplier for 5 years, which provides a meaningful platform history. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers, especially for payment security and dispute handling within the platform framework. The verified supplier status further strengthens its platform credibility.

The listed commercial labels, including “Business procurement,” “Warranty available,” and “Low MOQ for customization,” indicate that the supplier is positioned toward B2B procurement and small-batch customized purchasing. However, the data does not include internationally recognized factory certifications, management system certifications, or product-specific compliance certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility structure: 5-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are strong trust indicators for online B2B sourcing. The score is not full because the provided data does not show independent factory certifications, product compliance certificates, or a broader verified certification system beyond platform-based credibility.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Final Score: 19 / 20

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 2,000+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥5.7M+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Number of reviews: 500+

Elaboration

The supplier has strong recent commercial activity, with more than 2,000 orders and more than CN¥5.7 million in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has an active buyer base and has achieved meaningful transaction volume on the platform.

The 4.7 store rating and 500+ reviews provide additional validation that the company has accumulated a significant customer feedback base. A high order count combined with a sizable transaction amount suggests that the supplier is not only receiving small sample orders but also generating substantial sales value.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s commercial performance is strong across all available indicators: high order volume, high transaction value, solid rating, and a substantial number of reviews. These factors provide meaningful market validation. The score is slightly below full because the rating, while strong, is not perfect, and the data does not provide more granular information such as repeat purchase rate, dispute rate, or buyer geographic distribution.

Final Score

19 / 20

4. Service Capability

Final Score: 7 / 10

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time of within 2 hours suggests a reasonable level of communication efficiency. This is suitable for standard sourcing communication and routine order inquiries. The label “Low MOQ for customization” indicates some level of customization support, especially for buyers requiring small-batch customized purchasing.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. There is also no information on design support, private labeling, packaging customization, sample lead time, technical consultation, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows acceptable service responsiveness and some customization orientation through the low-MOQ customization label. However, because the response time is not within 1 hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, it should not be rated at the highest service level. The available data supports a moderate-to-good service capability score.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Final Score: 10 / 10

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 97.3%

Elaboration

The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 97.3%, which is above the 90% benchmark for strong delivery performance. This indicates that, based on the provided platform data, the supplier has been able to meet shipment timing commitments at a high level.

For procurement buyers, a delivery performance above 97% is a positive indicator, especially when combined with the supplier’s recent order volume. It suggests that the supplier has experience managing frequent order fulfillment.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, on-time delivery above 90% qualifies for 9 to 10 points. At 97.3%, the supplier demonstrates excellent delivery reliability. Since no negative delivery-related data is provided, the supplier receives the maximum score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Final Score: 16 / 20

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Reviews: 500+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.7 store rating and more than 500 reviews, indicating generally positive customer feedback with a meaningful volume of buyer responses. This level of feedback provides stronger quality visibility than suppliers with only limited or no review history.

The verified supplier status also adds a degree of confidence, but the data does not specify whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, third-party inspection reports, or product testing certifications. For hair products, consistency in texture, material claims, color, length, shedding, tangling, and packaging quality can be important, but the provided data does not include detailed quality-control evidence.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating and large review base support a good quality and feedback score. However, the lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection information and limited detail on factory verification prevent a top-tier quality score. The supplier appears to have solid customer acceptance, but procurement teams should still verify quality assurance procedures before placing large or repeat bulk orders.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for trial cooperation and controlled-volume purchasing.

Yuzhou Weiqi Hair Products Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, high recent transaction activity, solid customer feedback, and excellent on-time delivery performance. The supplier is suitable for buyers looking for hair extensions, Cambodian hair bundles, Burmese curly crochet hair, and related low-MOQ purchasing options.

Suitable Customer Types

• Small and medium hair product retailers
• Online beauty and hair extension sellers
• Buyers seeking low-MOQ procurement
• Importers testing Cambodian or Burmese-style human hair products
• Buyers who prefer Trade Assurance transactions

Main Risk Points

• Factory area: Insufficient Data
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Detailed factory capacity and production scale: Insufficient Data
• Specific third-party product or quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Growth Potential

The supplier has strong commercial momentum, with 2,000+ orders and CN¥5.7M+ transaction value over the past six months. If the company can provide clearer factory capacity data, quality inspection documentation, and confirmed customization capabilities, it could become more suitable for larger-volume or long-term procurement programs. For now, buyers should begin with sample orders or moderate-volume trial orders, then scale gradually after verifying product consistency and quality control performance.