zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based hair products supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of 980+㎡ and 50+ staff. The supplier focuses on human hair-related products, including raw Indian virgin body hair, HD lace/full lace wig products, deep wave human hair, highlighted styles, and Brazilian human hair products, with low MOQ options starting from 1 piece. From a procurement perspective, the company shows strong platform credibility, supported by 8 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and platform performance tags such as on-time delivery of 98.2% and response time within 1 hour. Its recent commercial activity is also strong, with 900+ orders and CN¥2.7M+ transaction volume in the past six months. However, the disclosed factory scale is relatively modest, and there is insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization capability. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for small to medium buyers, online retailers, and buyers requiring low MOQ sourcing with fast communication and reliable delivery.

Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd.
  • Country/Region: China, Henan
  • Factory area: 980+㎡
  • Employees: 50+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed physical production base of 980+㎡ and a workforce of over 50 employees. This indicates that the company has an established operating structure and basic production capability rather than being only a trading storefront. The verified supplier status also provides additional support that the company has undergone some form of platform-side verification.

However, based strictly on the provided data, the company does not present indicators of a large-scale manufacturing base, such as several thousand square meters of factory area, several hundred employees, multiple production lines, or disclosed annual production capacity. Therefore, while the company appears operationally established, its scale is better characterized as small to lower-middle sized rather than a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

The factory area of 980+㎡ and 50+ staff suggest basic and stable production capacity, but not a large-scale industrial operation. The verified supplier status improves confidence in its legitimacy and operational presence. Still, the available company-size data does not support a high score in the 18–20 range, which is reserved for large-scale and highly stable supply chain operations. The supplier fits the “small but with basic production capability” category, with a slight positive adjustment due to verification.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform/industry tags:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • On-time delivery 98.2%
  • Response time ≤1h

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through an 8-year Gold Supplier history, which indicates long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support further strengthens buyer protection by providing a structured transaction mechanism through the platform. The supplier is also marked as verified, which adds credibility from a compliance and identity-validation standpoint.

The available tags are relevant to procurement evaluation because they reflect practical commercial capabilities: low MOQ customization, strong delivery punctuality, and fast response. However, the provided data does not include detailed third-party factory audit reports, product-specific certifications, or formal quality management certifications such as ISO. Therefore, the assessment should recognize strong platform credibility while avoiding unsupported claims about broader compliance certifications.

Scoring Rationale

An 8-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status together represent a relatively complete platform trust framework. These are meaningful indicators for buyers evaluating supplier reliability on . The absence of disclosed independent factory certifications or management system certifications prevents a perfect score, but within the available platform data, the supplier’s credibility is strong and long-established.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 900+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.7M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 200+

Elaboration

The supplier shows solid recent business activity, with more than 900 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥2.7 million over the past six months. This indicates active market demand and a meaningful level of buyer engagement. A 4.7 store rating, combined with over 200 reviews, provides a reasonable level of commercial validation.

The order volume is strong, especially when paired with low MOQ product offerings starting from 1 piece. This suggests that the supplier may serve a broad buyer base, including smaller retailers, dropshipping-style buyers, boutique hair businesses, and trial-order customers. The transaction value also demonstrates that the supplier is not only receiving small inquiries but converting orders into measurable revenue.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 900+ recent orders, CN¥2.7M+ transaction value, a 4.7 rating, and 200+ reviews supports a high score. The supplier has clear evidence of recent sales activity and customer engagement. The score is not set at the absolute maximum because the rating, while good, is not near-perfect, and the data does not include repeat purchase rate, dispute rate, refund rate, or customer segmentation.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤1h
  • Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 1 hour is a strong service indicator, particularly for international buyers who require quick quotation, sample confirmation, and order communication. Fast communication can reduce procurement delays and improve buyer confidence during product selection and order placement.

The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some level of customization support with flexible minimum order requirements. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability. There is no detailed information about private label services, packaging customization, color customization, cap construction customization, logo service, or design development. Therefore, the customization capability should be treated as partial or basic based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a strong service score due to its response time of ≤1h, which meets the highest service-speed benchmark. However, because Full Customization is not directly confirmed, the score should not reach the 9–10 range reserved for suppliers with both rapid response and clearly documented strong customization capability. The available evidence supports good service capability but with incomplete customization verification.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 98.2%

Elaboration

The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 98.2%, which is a strong logistics and fulfillment indicator. For procurement buyers, especially those operating online retail or inventory-sensitive business models, delivery reliability is an important factor in reducing customer complaints, stockout risk, and operational uncertainty.

A delivery performance above 90% falls into the highest scoring range under the given evaluation standard. The reported 98.2% is well above the threshold and suggests that the supplier has effective order handling and shipment coordination based on platform-recorded performance.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 98.2%, the supplier demonstrates excellent delivery reliability. There is no provided negative delivery data to reduce the score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 200+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.7 store rating and more than 200 reviews, which provides a meaningful base of customer feedback. This indicates that buyers have completed transactions and submitted evaluations at a relatively significant volume. The verified supplier status also adds a basic level of trust regarding supplier identity and operational presence.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection processes, formal quality control certifications, inspection reports, or product-specific testing. For hair products, quality consistency can be highly important, including factors such as hair texture consistency, shedding, tangling, density, lace quality, and color accuracy. Since none of these inspection or product performance details are provided, they cannot be assumed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a good score due to a solid 4.7 rating, 200+ reviews, and verified supplier status. These factors support a reasonable level of customer satisfaction and basic quality confidence. However, because Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed and no detailed quality assurance system is disclosed, the supplier should not be scored in the 18–20 range. The score reflects good customer feedback but incomplete documented quality-control evidence.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for low-MOQ and small-to-medium volume sourcing.

Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking human hair products with low MOQ, fast response, strong platform credibility, and reliable delivery performance. The supplier is particularly appropriate for online retailers, boutique hair businesses, trial-order buyers, and buyers who need flexible purchasing quantities starting from 1 piece.

The main strengths are its 8-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier profile, strong recent order activity, CN¥2.7M+ six-month transaction volume, 98.2% on-time delivery rate, and response time within 1 hour.

Key risks include the relatively modest disclosed factory scale, lack of confirmed Full Customization capability, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal quality control systems. Buyers should request product samples, confirm quality standards in writing, and clarify inspection procedures before placing larger orders.

The supplier shows growth potential due to strong platform sales activity, fast communication, and reliable delivery metrics. If it can provide clearer quality inspection documentation and more detailed customization capabilities, its procurement suitability would be further strengthened.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Henan Ruimei Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ruimei Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Xin Xin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Xin Xin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Capelli Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Capelli Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Wanhao Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Wanhao Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Alice Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Alice Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Zs Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Zs Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Ushine Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Ushine Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Mushang Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Mushang Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Weiken Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Weiken Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Weiqi Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Weiqi Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Fuxin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Fuxin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Dianpin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Dianpin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Jinbang Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Jinbang Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Huashuo Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Huashuo Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Zinuo Chemical Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Zinuo Chemical Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Vipoo Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Vipoo Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Taiguo Boiler Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Taiguo Boiler Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Beauty East Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Beauty East Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangzhou Kindom Opto-Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kindom Opto-Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Infraswin Energy Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Infraswin Energy Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Gaussian Strong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Gaussian Strong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Wenli Hoisting Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Wenli Hoisting Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Nanway Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Nanway Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yabo Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yabo Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Xiesheng Construction Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Xiesheng Construction Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Weidasi Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Weidasi Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boente Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boente Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qiuyan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qiuyan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Prologade Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Prologade Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Legend Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Legend Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenze Jiamei Screen Printing Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenze Jiamei Screen Printing Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Aorun International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Aorun International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Huaxuan Gelatin Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Huaxuan Gelatin Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Keorh Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Keorh Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Lvyuan Water Treatment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Lvyuan Water Treatment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Rayco Audio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Rayco Audio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026