zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd.

Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based sanitary products supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of 7,800+㎡ and 80+ staff. The supplier appears to be a medium-sized manufacturer with verified supplier status, 6 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and strong platform indicators such as 100.0% on-time delivery and response time within 1 hour. Its listed products focus on baby wipes, non-woven wipes, pure water baby wipes, aloe wipes, and private label/OEM-type wipe products, generally with MOQ levels of 5,000–10,000 bags. Business performance is relatively strong, with 80+ orders and CN¥5.4M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 40+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking stable mid-scale sourcing of wipes products, especially those requiring responsive communication and reliable shipment performance. Key limitations include insufficient data on finished product inspection, formal quality certifications, and full customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Henan, China
  • Factory area: 7,800+㎡
  • Employees: 80+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory verification: True
  • Product scope shown: multiple baby wipes and non-woven wipes products

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical production base of over 7,800㎡ and more than 80 employees, indicating a meaningful production footprint rather than a small trading operation. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has undergone at least a basic platform-level verification process. The product listings show several related wipe categories, suggesting focused production or supply capability within sanitary wipe products.

However, based strictly on the provided data, the company does not reach the scale of a large manufacturing group. The workforce of 80+ and factory area of 7,800+㎡ indicate a medium-sized operation. There is no provided information on production lines, monthly output, automated equipment, cleanroom conditions, R&D team, or export markets, so the assessment cannot assume large-scale industrial capacity beyond the disclosed factory size and staff count.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates stable mid-sized factory characteristics, supported by a defined factory area, staff base, and verified supplier status. These indicators are stronger than those of a small or unverified supplier, but the lack of detailed production capacity data prevents a top-tier score. The supplier fits the “medium stable factory” range rather than the “large-scale stable supply chain” range.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier tenure: 6 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform tags provided:
  • On-time delivery 100.0%
  • Response time ≤1h
  • Certification / industry label completeness: Limited data provided
  • Formal product or management certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively solid platform profile, including 6 years as a Gold Supplier and support for Trade Assurance. A 6-year Gold Supplier history is a positive credibility indicator because it reflects platform continuity over multiple years. Trade Assurance provides a transaction protection mechanism, which can reduce procurement risk for buyers using .

The supplier is also marked as a verified supplier, which adds credibility. However, the listed certification or industry tags are limited to operational indicators such as on-time delivery and response time. There is no provided evidence of formal quality management certifications, product safety certifications, hygiene certifications, or third-party compliance documents. Therefore, the compliance evaluation must remain limited to platform-based credibility rather than broader regulatory or technical compliance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has strong platform credibility due to 6 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful indicators for -based sourcing. However, the absence of disclosed formal certifications or more complete compliance labels limits the score from reaching the maximum range. The credibility profile is strong but not fully comprehensive.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 80+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥5.4M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity, with more than 80 orders and over CN¥5.4M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has an active buyer base and is not merely maintaining a passive product listing. The transaction value is particularly meaningful because it suggests a relatively solid order size or repeat purchasing activity.

The store rating of 4.9 is high and supports a positive market perception. The review count of 40+ provides some customer feedback base, though it is not extremely large. From a procurement perspective, the combination of transaction value, order count, rating, and reviews supports commercial validation, but the limited number of reviews means buyer feedback depth is moderate rather than extensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s recent transaction value and order volume are strong for platform-based sourcing, and the 4.9 rating is a positive quality and service signal. The score is high because commercial traction is clearly demonstrated. It is not scored at the absolute maximum because 40+ reviews, while useful, do not represent a very large review base, and no repeat-buyer ratio or major customer information is provided.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤1h
  • Product listings include OEM and private label wording
  • Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
  • Communication efficiency: Supported by response time ≤1h

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong response indicator, with communication response time reported as within 1 hour. This is a valuable service metric for procurement teams, especially for quotation follow-up, sample coordination, order confirmation, and issue resolution. The product titles include OEM and private label references, which suggests some private-label or OEM-oriented offering in the listed products.

However, the provided service capability data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” support. While OEM and private label wording appears in product names, it is not sufficient to confirm the depth of customization capability, such as packaging design, formula customization, material customization, fragrance options, sheet size adjustment, or private mold development. Therefore, customization capability must be treated as partially indicated but not fully verified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a strong service score because response time is within 1 hour, meeting the highest response-efficiency benchmark. Nevertheless, because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed in the service data, the score should not reach the full 9–10 range. The supplier appears service-responsive, with partial OEM/private-label indicators, but customization depth requires further confirmation.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided in the dataset. For procurement teams, this is an important operational metric because wipes products are often purchased in recurring or seasonal replenishment cycles, where delivery delays can directly affect inventory availability and retail continuity.

The score is based strictly on the reported on-time delivery rate. No additional information is provided regarding average lead time, peak-season capacity, shipping methods, export documentation performance, or delay handling process. Therefore, the evaluation focuses only on the disclosed delivery punctuality metric.

Scoring Rationale

According to the required scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it meets the highest delivery-performance threshold. The absence of broader logistics data prevents additional qualitative expansion, but it does not reduce the score under the specified delivery criterion.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 40+
  • Verified supplier / factory verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Formal quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive indicator of customer satisfaction. The review count of 40+ provides a moderate feedback base, supporting the credibility of the rating to some extent. Verified supplier status also provides a basic level of factory or supplier authentication, which contributes to quality assurance confidence.

However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, quality-control workflow, hygiene control standards, material traceability, or formal quality certifications. For sanitary products such as baby wipes and non-woven wipes, quality and compliance documentation can be highly important, especially for buyers targeting regulated retail channels. Since such information is not included, the quality assessment must remain cautious.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s high rating and verified status support a good quality-feedback profile. However, the number of reviews is moderate rather than extensive, and key quality assurance elements such as Finished Product Inspection are not provided. The score reflects a supplier with positive customer feedback and basic verification, but not enough disclosed quality-system evidence to justify a top-tier quality score.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Henan Ankang Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. demonstrates a strong overall supplier profile with an 86/100 score. The company is suitable for buyers seeking a medium-sized, platform-verified Chinese supplier for baby wipes, non-woven wipes, pure water wipes, aloe wipes, and OEM/private-label-style wipe products. Its strongest advantages are 6 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 100.0% on-time delivery, ≤1h response time, and solid recent transaction performance of CN¥5.4M+ across 80+ orders in the past six months.

The supplier is especially suitable for: - Small to mid-sized importers seeking stable wipe product sourcing
- E-commerce sellers needing responsive communication
- Buyers requiring Trade Assurance protection
- Private-label buyers, subject to further confirmation of customization scope

Main risks: - Insufficient Data on Finished Product Inspection
- Insufficient Data on formal quality or product safety certifications
- Insufficient Data on full customization capability
- Limited detail on production capacity, lead time, quality-control process, and export compliance documentation

Growth potential is positive, supported by strong platform activity, high rating, verified supplier status, and excellent delivery performance. Before placing large or compliance-sensitive orders, buyers should request quality-control documentation, product test reports, sample approval, packaging customization confirmation, and inspection arrangements.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Quanzhou Era Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Era Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jiayue Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jiayue Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Perfecare Sanitary Products Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Perfecare Sanitary Products Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ankang Meihele Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ankang Meihele Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ruimei Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ruimei Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Zinuo Chemical Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Zinuo Chemical Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Vipoo Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Vipoo Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Taiguo Boiler Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Taiguo Boiler Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mesa Sanitary Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mesa Sanitary Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Keorh Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Keorh Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Degaostone Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Degaostone Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongsheng Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongsheng Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou  Baogeli Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Baogeli Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Gedi Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Gedi Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Puxin Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Puxin Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yite Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yite Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kaiping Yolo Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kaiping Yolo Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Homedec Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Homedec Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Kerui Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Kerui Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shanghai Aidu Intelligent Detection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Aidu Intelligent Detection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Keyi Container Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Keyi Container Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dongjubo Machinery Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dongjubo Machinery Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Sitong Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Sitong Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yudong Boiler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yudong Boiler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Jieyao Lighting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Jieyao Lighting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Deyi Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Deyi Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Longyi Metal Crafts Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Longyi Metal Crafts Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhihengda Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhihengda Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Forge Windows And Doors (Foshan) Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Forge Windows And Doors (Foshan) Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan City Kanggao Electrical Appliance Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan City Kanggao Electrical Appliance Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Feeleato Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Feeleato Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tiantai Yongsheng Traffic Facilities Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tiantai Yongsheng Traffic Facilities Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Guangxing Pneumatic Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Guangxing Pneumatic Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Bofeng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Bofeng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Keqirui Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Keqirui Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Beigain Hardware Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Beigain Hardware Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wemet Lift Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wemet Lift Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yueda Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yueda Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026