zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Yueda Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Guangzhou Yueda Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: Guangdong, China

Guangzhou Yueda Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Yueda Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. appears to be a medium-sized optoelectronics-related supplier with a reported factory area of 3,100+ m² and 60+ staff. The company is listed as a verified supplier and supports Trade Assurance, with a 1-year Gold Supplier status. Its platform profile includes relevant capability and quality labels such as Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available, and warranty availability. Business performance is supported by 300+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a store rating of 4.6 from 60+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 95.2% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium batch procurement, customized products, and platform-protected transactions. However, its relatively short Gold Supplier history and limited disclosed certification details require cautious qualification before large-scale or long-term strategic sourcing.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory area: 3,100+ m²
  • Employees: 60+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory certification/audit details: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a measurable physical operating base, with a factory area above 3,000 m² and more than 60 employees. This indicates a certain level of production organization and operational capability, especially compared with very small trading-only entities. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operating profile of the company. However, the provided data does not include detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, quality system certifications, or third-party factory audit reports.

Scoring Rationale

The company does not appear to be a large-scale manufacturing group based on the available data, but it has sufficient factory space, staffing, and verification status to support small-to-medium procurement needs. The lack of disclosed production capacity and detailed factory audit/certification information prevents it from being rated in the highest range. It fits best within the “medium stable factory” category rather than a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification/industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements reduce transaction risk and provide buyers with basic platform-backed protection. The presence of labels such as Finished Product Inspection and Warranty available also supports a more complete compliance profile on the platform. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the supplier’s demonstrated long-term platform track record.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the key platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and relevant quality/service labels. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier tenure, which means the supplier has not yet built a long multi-year credibility record on the platform. Therefore, it should be rated as having core platform compliance in place, but not yet long-term proven.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
  • Store rating: 4.6 / 5.0
  • Reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier has visible recent transaction activity, with more than 300 orders in the past six months. This indicates active market demand and a reasonable level of buyer engagement. The transaction value of CN¥202.8K+ suggests moderate commercial scale rather than very large-volume industrial supply. A store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, while 60+ reviews provide some customer feedback base, though not enough to be considered extensive.

Scoring Rationale

The order count is relatively strong, but the total transaction value remains moderate. The rating is good, but not exceptionally high, and the review count is acceptable but not large enough to fully validate high-volume, long-term performance. The supplier demonstrates stable business activity and commercial validation, but the data does not support a top-tier business performance score.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time within two hours, which is commercially acceptable for online procurement communication. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service indicates that the supplier can support customized requirements rather than only standard product transactions. This is valuable for buyers with product adaptation, branding, or specification-related needs. However, the response time is not listed as within one hour, so it does not reach the highest service-response level under the scoring framework.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong customization profile and acceptable communication efficiency. Since the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, the service capability should not be placed in the 9–10 range. Nevertheless, Full Customization and ODM availability support an above-average score within the normal-response category.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 95.2%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is above 90%, which indicates strong delivery execution according to the provided benchmark. A 95.2% rate suggests that most orders are shipped on schedule, reducing the likelihood of fulfillment delays for buyers. This is particularly important for cross-border procurement where logistics lead time is already a critical variable.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 95.2%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability. However, the data only covers dispatch performance and does not include full end-to-end delivery lead time, cancellation rate, or logistics issue rate, so a full 10 is not assigned.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6 / 5.0
  • Reviews: 60+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Available
  • Detailed quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive customer feedback profile, supported by a 4.6 store rating and more than 60 reviews. The Finished Product Inspection label indicates that a basic quality control process is available at the final product stage. Warranty availability further supports buyer confidence. The verified supplier status also contributes to quality assurance from a platform credibility perspective. However, the data does not disclose specific quality management certifications, inspection standards, defect rates, or detailed testing procedures.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows good customer satisfaction and has platform-visible quality assurance labels. However, the review base is moderate rather than large, and the rating, while good, is not at the highest level. Since detailed certifications or documented quality systems are not provided, the supplier should be scored as having good but not fully comprehensive quality assurance.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Guangzhou Yueda Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume procurement, platform-protected transactions, and customized or ODM-supported products. The supplier shows balanced performance across company scale, platform credibility, recent transaction activity, service capability, delivery reliability, and quality feedback.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium-sized importers
- E-commerce sellers requiring low MOQ purchasing
- Buyers needing Full Customization or ODM support
- Customers preferring Trade Assurance protection

Main risks:
- Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, limiting long-term platform track record.
- Detailed factory audit reports, production capacity, and quality certifications are Insufficient Data.
- Review volume is moderate, not extensive.
- Transaction value is stable but not high enough to confirm large-scale supply capability.

Growth potential:
The supplier shows positive growth indicators through 300+ recent orders, 95.2% on-time dispatch, customization capability, and platform-backed quality labels. If it continues to accumulate transaction history, customer reviews, and verifiable quality certifications, it may become a stronger candidate for larger or repeat procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Demuda Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Demuda Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Donghua Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Donghua Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Learnew Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Learnew Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Wentao Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Wentao Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Toosen Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Toosen Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pakcai Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pakcai Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hinchytek Optoelectronics (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hinchytek Optoelectronics (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Clen Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Clen Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Loyalshine Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Loyalshine Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lianzhen Optoelectronics Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lianzhen Optoelectronics Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongzhuo Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongzhuo Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Newlink Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Newlink Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boente Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boente Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yule Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yule Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gcraftsman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gcraftsman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xuanzhi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xuanzhi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chuangruixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chuangruixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiebao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiebao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Wenzhou Binao Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Binao Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jiuling Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jiuling Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Chinaron Opto-Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Chinaron Opto-Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zhenda Brush Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zhenda Brush Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Miji Electronics And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Miji Electronics And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Qiangguan Ironware Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Qiangguan Ironware Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hongchen Irrigation Euqipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hongchen Irrigation Euqipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Qingyunzhi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Qingyunzhi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Qianjiang Kingphar Medical Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Qianjiang Kingphar Medical Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kailun New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kailun New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sinorise Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sinorise Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kaho Polymer Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kaho Polymer Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zyx Bicycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zyx Bicycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Buyut Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Buyut Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Maiqijia Home Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Maiqijia Home Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sincemile Makeup Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sincemile Makeup Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Deko Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Deko Corporation Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026