Jiangxi Qimai Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Jiangxi Qimai Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Jiangxi Qimai Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangxi, offering construction and coating-related products such as marble-effect epoxy flooring, waterproof self-leveling materials, K11 polymer cement waterproof paint, and adhesion/toughness coating products. The supplier shows a small-scale operational profile, with a reported factory area of 2,100+㎡ and 10+ staff, but it benefits from verified supplier status on the platform. Commercially, the company demonstrates reasonable market activity, with 100+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months. Platform credibility is supported by 2 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, fast response time, and a high on-time delivery rate of 98.2%. However, available data is limited regarding production capacity, full customization, finished product inspection, and detailed quality certifications. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume sourcing of coating and waterproofing products with platform-backed transaction protection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Jiangxi, China
• Factory area: 2,100+㎡
• Employees: 10+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes epoxy floor materials, waterproof self-leveling products, K11 waterproof paint, and adhesion/toughness coating products.

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical operational base with a reported factory area of over 2,100㎡, which indicates the presence of basic production or warehousing capability. However, the employee count of 10+ staff suggests a relatively small operating team. This limits evidence of large-scale production capacity, complex order handling, or strong internal departmental specialization.

The verified supplier status provides a positive signal that the platform has conducted some level of supplier verification. However, the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production line numbers, annual output, machinery information, R&D capability, or formal factory management certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing or supply capability, but its scale appears limited based on the relatively small staff size and moderate factory area. The verified supplier status improves credibility, but there is insufficient evidence to classify the company as a medium or large-scale stable manufacturing supplier. Therefore, it fits the category of a small supplier with basic production capability.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform tags: “Response time ≤1h”, “On-time delivery 98.2%”
• Detailed industry certifications: Insufficient Data
• Factory certification details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several platform-based credibility indicators. Being a Gold Supplier for 2 years shows some operating history on , though the duration is still relatively short compared with long-established suppliers. Trade Assurance availability is a meaningful risk-control tool for buyers, as it provides platform-supported transaction protection.

The supplier is also marked as verified, which strengthens platform credibility. However, the available certification or industry tags are limited to service and delivery performance indicators. There is no provided evidence of product-specific certifications, quality management system certification, environmental compliance, chemical safety compliance, or other third-party factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core elements of platform credibility: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 2 years, and certification completeness is limited based on the available data. This supports a mid-level credibility score rather than a top-tier score.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated measurable commercial activity over the past six months. More than 100 orders and CN¥1M+ in transaction value indicate that the supplier is not inactive and has been able to convert buyer demand into actual platform transactions.

A store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, although it is not exceptionally high. The review count of 30+ provides some customer feedback basis, but it is still moderate rather than extensive. The available transaction data suggests the supplier has some market acceptance, but the business scale is not large enough to be considered highly mature or heavily validated by a broad buyer base.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s transaction volume and order count are stronger than those of a lightly validated supplier. However, the review base remains relatively limited, and the 4.6 rating, while acceptable, leaves room for improvement. This supports a stable medium-level business performance score.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤1 hour
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Other service capability details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of less than or equal to one hour is a strong indicator of communication efficiency. Fast response is particularly important in sourcing processes involving quotation comparison, sample confirmation, order negotiation, and after-sales issue handling.

However, the provided data does not indicate whether the supplier supports full customization, private labeling, formula adjustment, packaging customization, or technical consultation. Because customization capability is not confirmed, the service evaluation cannot be rated at the highest level despite the fast response performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in response speed, which is a key service metric. However, there is insufficient data on customization capability and broader service structure. Therefore, the score reflects strong communication efficiency but limited evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 98.2%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 98.2% is a strong operational indicator. A rate above 90% meets the highest scoring band under the evaluation framework. This suggests that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has been able to fulfill orders within expected delivery timelines.

However, the data does not provide additional details such as average lead time, export shipment experience, urgent order handling capability, or historical late shipment causes. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the stated on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

With an on-time delivery rate of 98.2%, the supplier clearly falls into the highest delivery performance category. This is one of the supplier’s strongest indicators and provides confidence for buyers who prioritize timely fulfillment.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 30+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Supplier verification is marked True
• Product-specific certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s store rating of 4.6 indicates generally positive customer satisfaction. The presence of 30+ reviews provides some level of buyer feedback, though the volume is not large enough to fully validate consistency across many transactions or product batches.

Supplier verification adds credibility, but the data does not confirm whether finished product inspection is conducted before shipment. There is also no information regarding internal QC procedures, testing standards, batch inspection reports, third-party inspection availability, or product compliance certifications. For chemical, coating, waterproofing, and flooring-related products, quality consistency can be important, but the available data is not sufficient to verify the supplier’s quality control depth.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a positive rating and some customer feedback, supported by verified supplier status. However, the absence of confirmed finished product inspection and detailed quality certification limits the score. The supplier appears to have basic quality credibility but not enough evidence to be classified as having a comprehensive quality assurance system.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Jiangxi Qimai Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume procurement of epoxy flooring, waterproof coating, self-leveling materials, and related construction coating products. The supplier shows reasonable commercial validation through 100+ recent orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months. Its strong on-time delivery rate of 98.2%, fast response time, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status make it a practical option for platform-based sourcing.

However, buyers should manage several risks before placing larger or long-term orders. Key risk points include limited company scale, only 10+ staff, relatively short Gold Supplier history of 2 years, moderate review count, and insufficient data regarding full customization, finished product inspection, product certifications, and detailed factory quality systems.

For first-time cooperation, it is recommended to begin with sample testing or a small trial order, use Trade Assurance, confirm technical specifications in writing, and request quality inspection documents where applicable. The supplier has growth potential if it can provide stronger quality documentation, clearer customization capability, and more transparent production capacity data.