Shanghai Cet Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Cet Electric Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, offering electrical contactor-related products including modular DIN rail AC contactors, CJX2 AC magnetic contactors, definite purpose AC contactors, and OEM customized contactors. Based on the provided data, the company operates from a reported factory area of 2,200+ m² with 70+ staff and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a basic-to-mid scale production foundation. On , the supplier has 4 years of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and reports 100.0% on-time delivery, which strengthens platform credibility and delivery reliability. Commercially, the supplier shows CN¥3.3M+ transaction value over the past six months, but the order count is only 10+ and customer review volume is very limited at 1 review. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking electrical contactors with low MOQ options and platform-backed transaction protection, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity, quality control procedures, and customization capability before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Shanghai Cet Electric Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China
• Factory location: Shanghai
• Factory area: 2,200+ m²
• Employees: 70+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a declared manufacturing footprint of over 2,200 m² and a workforce of more than 70 employees. This indicates that the company is not a purely trading-oriented storefront based on the provided information, but has a defined production base and staffing structure. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of basic company and factory-level validation.

However, the factory size and employee count suggest a small-to-medium production operation rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The available data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery details, output volume, factory audit reports, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, while the company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability, the depth of its production system cannot be fully confirmed from the current dataset.

Scoring Rationale

A factory area of 2,200+ m² and 70+ staff provides a reasonable operational base for supplying electrical contactor products, especially for small and medium-volume procurement. The verified supplier status improves confidence in the company’s legitimacy. Nevertheless, the absence of detailed capacity data, production line information, and formal factory certification prevents the supplier from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain provider. The company fits best into the lower end of the “medium stable factory” category.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform/industry tags:
• Response time ≤7h
• On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has 4 years of Gold Supplier status and supports Trade Assurance, which provides buyers with a platform-supported transaction protection mechanism. The verified supplier status also strengthens credibility from a platform compliance perspective. The available tags indicate operational performance indicators such as response time and on-time delivery, but they do not represent product compliance certifications or industry-specific approvals.

The platform profile appears credible, but the certification structure is not fully comprehensive based on the provided data. There is no information on product certifications, management system certifications, third-party audit reports, export compliance documentation, or industry-standard approvals. As a result, the supplier shows a solid platform presence but not a complete compliance-backed supplier profile.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of Gold Supplier status, 4-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status provides a credible foundation for online procurement. However, the Gold Supplier duration is moderate rather than long-term, and the certification/industry tags provided are limited to operational indicators rather than broader compliance documentation. This supports a score in the “core certifications available but not fully complete” range.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥3.3M+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded over CN¥3.3M in transaction value during the past six months, which is a positive indicator of commercial activity. This suggests that the supplier has completed measurable transactions on the platform. The store rating is 5.0, indicating positive buyer feedback from the available review data.

However, the commercial validation is partially limited by the low order count of 10+ and only 1 customer review. A high transaction amount combined with a small number of orders may indicate larger-value transactions, but the dataset does not provide buyer identities, repeat purchase rate, customer distribution, or order categories. The very small review base also makes it difficult to assess consistency of customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale

The CN¥3.3M+ transaction value is relatively strong and supports the supplier’s commercial credibility. At the same time, the order count is not high, and the review base is too limited to confirm broad market acceptance or stable repeat business. The 5.0 rating is favorable but statistically weak due to only 1 review. Therefore, the supplier demonstrates moderate business performance, with stronger transaction value than customer feedback depth.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤7h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Product listing includes “OEM Customized Contactor Definite Purpose Magnetic”
• No explicit platform data confirming full customization capability was provided

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time is within 7 hours, which indicates an acceptable communication standard for international B2B sourcing. This is not a top-tier response speed such as within 1 hour, but it is still within a reasonable commercial response window.

The product information includes an OEM customized contactor item, but the dataset does not explicitly confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization as a verified capability. Therefore, customization capability should be treated cautiously. The supplier may offer some form of OEM-related product option, but the level of engineering customization, branding support, packaging customization, private labeling, or technical modification capability cannot be confirmed from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The response time of ≤7h supports a normal service capability level. However, because there is no explicit confirmation of Full Customization and no supporting details regarding customization workflow, sample development, technical support, or after-sales service, the supplier should not receive a high service capability score. The service profile is acceptable but not strongly differentiated.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. This suggests that the supplier has performed well in meeting agreed shipment timelines within the measured platform data.

However, the dataset does not disclose the number of shipments included in this delivery calculation, shipment destinations, product categories shipped, logistics methods, or whether delays occurred outside platform-recorded transactions. Therefore, while the on-time delivery rate is excellent, buyers should still verify lead times and delivery terms for larger or customized orders.

Scoring Rationale

A 100.0% on-time delivery rate directly meets the top-tier delivery performance benchmark. Although the underlying shipment sample size is not provided, the available data supports a full score under the defined scoring criteria.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status is provided, but detailed factory verification scope is not provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the review count is only 1. This limits the reliability of the rating as a quality signal. A single review cannot adequately represent long-term product consistency, defect rate, after-sales performance, or batch-to-batch stability.

The supplier is marked as verified, which provides some quality-related confidence from a supplier legitimacy and verification perspective. However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, formal quality management certification, inspection reports, product testing procedures, electrical safety certifications, or third-party quality audits. For electrical contactor products, quality assurance is important, but the available dataset does not provide enough information to evaluate technical compliance or inspection rigor.

Scoring Rationale

The 5.0 rating is favorable but based on a very small review sample. Verified supplier status provides basic credibility, but the absence of Finished Product Inspection data and detailed quality assurance documentation limits the score. The supplier demonstrates some quality confidence indicators, but the customer feedback base and inspection transparency are insufficient for a higher rating.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for trial orders and medium-risk procurement scenarios.

Shanghai Cet Electric Co., Ltd. shows a credible supplier profile with verified supplier status, 4 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, CN¥3.3M+ transaction value in the past six months, and a strong 100.0% on-time delivery rate. These indicators make the supplier suitable for buyers sourcing electrical contactors in smaller or medium-sized batches, especially where Trade Assurance is preferred for transaction protection.

Suitable customer types include:
- Buyers seeking AC contactors and related electrical contactor products
- Small to medium-sized importers or distributors
- Buyers requiring low MOQ options, as several listed products show MOQs of 10 or 100 pieces
- Customers willing to start with trial orders before scaling volume

Main risks:
- Limited review base, with only 1 review despite a 5.0 rating
- Insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection
- Insufficient data on formal product certifications or quality management systems
- No detailed production capacity, machinery, or annual output information
- Full Customization capability is not explicitly confirmed in the provided data

Growth potential:
The supplier has a moderate factory base, platform credibility, strong delivery performance, and meaningful transaction value. If it can provide more detailed quality documentation, inspection processes, product compliance certificates, and stronger customer feedback records, its procurement attractiveness would improve significantly for larger-volume or more compliance-sensitive buyers.