zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Chejiashi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Chejiashi Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, positioned around carbon fiber automotive exterior accessories, particularly rear spoilers, trunk spoilers, boot wings, and roof spoilers. The supplier shows relatively strong production fundamentals, with a reported factory area of 20,000+ sqm, 400+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its profile also indicates strong platform credibility, including 14 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. Commercial activity is solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥14.8M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 50+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established carbon fiber spoiler sourcing with low MOQ options. Key limitations include an 87.9% on-time delivery rate, which is acceptable but not top-tier, and insufficient disclosed data on Full Customization and Finished Product Inspection.

Shenzhen Chejiashi Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 20,000+ sqm
- Employees: 400+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Main listed products: carbon fiber rear spoilers, trunk spoilers, boot wings, roof spoilers

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a relatively substantial manufacturing base based on the disclosed factory area and workforce size. A 20,000+ sqm facility and 400+ employees suggest capacity beyond a small workshop or trading-only operation. The product listings are concentrated in carbon fiber automotive spoiler products, which indicates a focused category rather than a broad, unrelated product mix.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of factory scale, employee count, and verified supplier status supports classification as a large and stable production-oriented supplier. However, the data does not include detailed production line count, monthly output, equipment list, or specific factory audit reports, so the score should not reach the absolute maximum.

Final Score
18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, Response time ≤3h, On-time delivery 87.9%

Elaboration
The supplier has a long operating history, with 14 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance availability adds platform-level transaction protection, while verified supplier status provides additional credibility. The listed platform tags also give buyers visibility into MOQ flexibility, response speed, and delivery performance.

Scoring Rationale
A 14-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification represent a strong platform credibility profile. The certification and industry tag information is useful, though it does not include independent product certifications or detailed factory audit documents. Therefore, the supplier deserves a high score but not a perfect score.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥14.8M+
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 50+

Elaboration
The supplier shows meaningful recent commercial activity, with more than 200 orders and over CN¥14.8M in transaction value within six months. This indicates active market demand and a reasonable level of buyer validation. The 4.5 rating is positive, while the review count of 50+ provides some customer feedback base, though it is not extremely large relative to the transaction volume.

Scoring Rationale
The order count and transaction value are strong indicators of business traction. However, the 4.5 rating is good rather than excellent, and the review volume is moderate rather than high. The supplier can be considered commercially proven, but there is still room for improvement in customer review depth and rating performance.

Final Score
17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤3h
- Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag indicates some level of customization flexibility, particularly for smaller buyers or trial orders. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM development, design support, or engineering-level modification services.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable but does not meet the ≤1 hour benchmark required for the highest service score. The customization-related tag is positive, but because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the service capability should be rated as solid but not advanced.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 87.9%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate falls within the 80%–89% range. This indicates generally acceptable delivery reliability, but it also means there is a measurable risk of shipment delay compared with suppliers exceeding 90%.

Scoring Rationale
Based on the stated scoring standard, an 87.9% on-time delivery rate qualifies for the 7–8 point range. Since the figure is close to 88% but still below the 90% high-performance threshold, the appropriate score is at the upper end of the mid-range.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 50+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive customer-facing rating and a moderate number of reviews. Verified supplier status provides some confidence in company legitimacy and operational presence. However, there is no disclosed information confirming Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control workflow, inspection reports, defect rate, product certification, or third-party quality audit results.

Scoring Rationale
The 4.5 rating and 50+ reviews indicate generally acceptable customer feedback, but the review base is not large enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency. The absence of Finished Product Inspection data limits confidence in systematic quality assurance. As a result, the supplier fits the “good but not fully proven” quality category.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

84 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 18 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
- Business Performance: 17 / 20
- Service Capability: 7 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 8 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Shenzhen Chejiashi Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing carbon fiber automotive spoiler products with relatively low MOQ requirements. The supplier is most suitable for small-to-medium importers, automotive accessories distributors, online sellers, and buyers seeking an established supplier with strong transaction history and platform credibility.

Main risk points include the 87.9% on-time delivery rate, which is acceptable but below the preferred 90%+ level, and insufficient disclosed data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit scope, and formal quality control systems. Before bulk procurement, buyers should request product samples, inspection standards, packaging details, lead time confirmation, and quality control documentation.

Overall, the supplier shows strong growth and sourcing potential due to its factory scale, 14-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and recent transaction volume. It is a credible candidate for trial orders and scalable cooperation, provided that delivery timelines and quality inspection terms are clearly confirmed before purchase.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topko Product Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topko Product Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Onlykem (Jinan) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Onlykem (Jinan) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhuirizhe Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhuirizhe Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Muyuan Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Muyuan Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Biobase Meihua Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Biobase Meihua Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prb Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prb Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Jiujiang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Jiujiang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gz Leangle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gz Leangle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Huihua Headwear & Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Huihua Headwear & Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Suoer Electronic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Suoer Electronic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Colorful Fish Textile Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Colorful Fish Textile Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Realway Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Realway Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Lanying International Building Projects Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Lanying International Building Projects Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Work-Sun (Beijing) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Work-Sun (Beijing) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Waco Design Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Waco Design Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Changteng International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Changteng International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuoye Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuoye Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Shengzhan Digital Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Shengzhan Digital Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chunhui Water-Saving Irrigation Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chunhui Water-Saving Irrigation Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Dongjun Glasses Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Dongjun Glasses Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026