Jiangsu Jiashike New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiangsu Jiashike New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, offering laminated non-woven, breathable protection film, waterproof fleece, temporary floor protection, and heavy-duty floor protection products. Based on the provided data, the company has a factory scale of 15,000+ m², 50+ staff, and is marked as a verified/audited supplier, indicating a basic-to-medium manufacturing foundation. On , it holds 4 years of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and lists ODM, minor customization, and full customization capabilities. Its recent business performance shows 20+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, but customer review data is absent and store rating is not provided. Delivery performance is strong, with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale custom floor/protection material sourcing, while quality feedback transparency remains a key limitation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Jiangsu Jiashike New Material Technology Co., Ltd.
• Country/region: China, Jiangsu Province
• Factory area: 15,000+ m²
• Employees: 50+ staff
• Verified/audited supplier: True
• Product scope includes multiple floor protection and breathable laminated non-woven related products.

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a reasonable physical manufacturing base with a factory area exceeding 15,000 m². This scale suggests it is not a small workshop-level operation and should have space for production, storage, and basic operational management. The employee count of 50+ staff indicates a small-to-medium labor force rather than a large industrial workforce. The presence of verified/audited supplier status strengthens the credibility of its production setup, although the provided data does not include detailed audit results, production line count, annual capacity, machinery list, or quality system certificates.

Scoring Rationale

The company has a meaningful factory footprint and confirmed supplier verification, which supports a medium-level assessment. However, the employee base is relatively moderate, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, automation level, factory certifications, or large-scale supply history. Therefore, it does not reach the “large-scale stable supply chain” level, but it fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory with basic manufacturing credibility.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified/audited supplier: True
• Certification/industry labels:
• ODM service available
• Minor customization
• Full customization
• Response time ≤3h

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile. Four years as a Gold Supplier indicates platform continuity and a degree of commercial stability. Trade Assurance provides buyers with transactional protection at the platform level. The verified/audited supplier status further supports credibility, although the provided information does not specify the exact audit body, audit scope, or whether internationally recognized factory certifications are available. The platform labels also show customization capability and response-time visibility, which are useful for procurement screening.

Scoring Rationale

Core platform trust elements are present: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The 4-year Gold Supplier history is credible but not yet long enough to be considered a very long-term platform track record. Certification information is mainly platform/service-label based, with no disclosed ISO, product compliance, environmental, or safety certifications. Therefore, the supplier deserves a strong but not top-tier score.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 20+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded some recent commercial activity, with more than 20 orders and over CN¥202.8K in transaction value during the last six months. This indicates that the company is not inactive and has achieved a measurable level of buyer engagement. However, the order quantity and transaction value remain moderate rather than high. More importantly, the absence of store rating data and the presence of zero customer reviews limit the ability to validate buyer satisfaction, repeat purchase quality, or post-transaction reliability.

Scoring Rationale

The recent transaction record provides a basic level of business validation, but the lack of store rating and customer reviews weakens commercial transparency. For procurement evaluation, orders and transaction amount show market activity, but customer feedback is essential for confirming consistency and buyer confidence. As a result, the supplier falls into the lower-to-mid business performance range rather than the high-performance category.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Platform labels include:
• ODM service available
• Minor customization
• Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of within three hours, which is acceptable for normal B2B sourcing communication. The presence of ODM service, minor customization, and full customization labels suggests that the supplier can support different levels of buyer-specific product requirements. This is relevant for customers requiring customized specifications for protection films, laminated non-woven materials, or temporary floor protection products. However, the provided data does not include details on engineering support, sample lead time, design capability, multilingual service, or after-sales process.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stronger-than-basic customization capability due to the full customization and ODM labels. However, its response time is ≤3h, not ≤1h, so it does not meet the highest service benchmark. Since customization capability is clearly indicated but communication speed is not top-tier and supporting service details are limited, a high-medium service score is appropriate.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. For procurement purposes, this suggests reliable order fulfillment within the measured platform period. This is especially important for construction, renovation, flooring, and protective material buyers, where project schedules may depend on timely receipt of consumable or protective materials. However, the provided data does not include average lead time, production cycle, logistics regions, export experience, or order volume behind the on-time rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier reaches the highest range for this dimension. The score is not reduced because the given delivery metric is clear and directly meets the top benchmark.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Verified/audited supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has some quality credibility through verified/audited supplier status, which indicates that certain supplier or factory information has been checked. However, the quality feedback profile is weak because no store rating is provided and there are zero customer reviews. This limits the ability to assess real buyer satisfaction, product consistency, complaint history, or repeat purchase confidence. Additionally, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing reports, quality certifications, or formal quality management system certification.

Scoring Rationale

Factory verification provides a basic quality assurance signal, but the absence of customer reviews and store rating significantly reduces confidence in market-validated quality performance. Since Finished Product Inspection is not provided, the quality control system cannot be considered complete based on the available data. The supplier therefore fits the “limited customer feedback / incomplete quality information” category rather than a strong quality-proven supplier.

Final Score

11 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Jiangsu Jiashike New Material Technology Co., Ltd. can be considered for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking breathable laminated non-woven materials, adhesive protection film, waterproof fleece, and temporary/heavy-duty floor protection products with customization requirements. The supplier shows solid platform credibility, verified/audited supplier status, Trade Assurance support, full customization capability, and excellent reported delivery performance.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers requiring mid-scale sourcing volumes
- Construction, renovation, flooring, or surface protection material buyers
- Customers needing ODM, minor customization, or full customization
- Buyers willing to begin with trial orders before scaling up

Main risk points:
- Store rating is not provided
- Customer review count is 0
- Finished Product Inspection data is not provided
- No detailed production capacity, certification, or quality system information is available

Growth potential:
The supplier has a stable platform foundation, reasonable factory scale, and strong delivery record. If it improves customer feedback visibility, provides inspection documentation, and discloses more quality-control and certification data, its procurement attractiveness could increase significantly.