Zhengzhou Shengda Khumic Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Zhengzhou Shengda Khumic Biotechnology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Henan, offering potassium humate, humic acid, fulvic acid, and amino acid organic fertilizer products. Based on the provided data, the company shows solid production-side capacity, with a reported factory area of over 66,000 m2, more than 80 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection and 100.0% on-time delivery. However, commercial validation is mixed: the supplier recorded only 2 orders in the past six months, despite a relatively high transaction value of CN¥4.3M+. Customer feedback data is weak, with no store rating provided and 0 reviews. This supplier appears more suitable for buyers prioritizing factory scale, platform-backed transaction security, and bulk fertilizer-related procurement, while buyers requiring strong customer-review evidence should proceed with additional due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Henan, China
- Factory area: 66,000+ m2
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a notable physical production base, especially with a factory area exceeding 66,000 m2. This indicates meaningful infrastructure capacity for manufacturing, storage, or processing activities. The employee count of 80+ suggests a medium-sized workforce rather than a very large labor organization. The verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has undergone some form of platform or supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale
The factory area is strong and supports the view that the company has established production capacity. However, the staff size is moderate, and the provided data does not include detailed production lines, annual output, equipment scale, or specific factory management certifications. Therefore, the supplier fits between a medium stable factory and a larger-capacity operation, but cannot be scored at the highest level due to incomplete production-depth data.

Final Score
17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, On-time delivery 100.0%, Response time ≤7h

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively mature platform presence, with 7 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. These factors improve transaction credibility and reduce procurement risk compared with suppliers lacking platform-backed mechanisms. The presence of labels such as Finished Product Inspection and on-time delivery also strengthens the supplier’s compliance and operational transparency within the platform.

Scoring Rationale
A 7-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, and Trade Assurance availability represent a strong credibility foundation. The certification and service labels are also reasonably complete. However, the data does not provide third-party international certifications, detailed audit reports, or specific compliance certificates beyond the platform labels. As a result, the supplier earns a high score, but not a perfect score.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 2
- Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥4.3M+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier shows a contrast between low order count and high transaction value. Only 2 orders in the past six months indicates limited visible transaction frequency. However, the CN¥4.3M+ transaction amount suggests that at least some transactions may have been large in value. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews significantly weaken buyer-side validation.

Scoring Rationale
The high transaction amount is a positive indicator of business activity, but the very low order count limits evidence of repeat or broad-market demand. More importantly, the lack of rating data and 0 reviews make it difficult to assess customer satisfaction or transaction consistency. Therefore, the supplier’s business performance is commercially meaningful but insufficiently validated by order volume and feedback.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤7h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤7 hours indicates acceptable communication availability, though it is not at the strongest level of ≤1 hour. No data is provided on Full Customization, OEM/ODM capability, formulation adjustment, packaging customization, or dedicated account support.

Scoring Rationale
The response time supports a basic-to-normal service capability, suitable for standard inquiry and procurement communication. However, because customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service flexibility. The score reflects adequate responsiveness but limited evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score
6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided data. This suggests that, within the available platform record, shipments have been completed according to committed delivery timelines.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. However, the interpretation should still consider that the past six-month order count is only 2, meaning the delivery record is positive but based on limited visible transaction volume.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Present
- Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. These are useful safeguards for procurement. However, customer feedback is very limited: no store rating is provided, and the review count is 0. This means there is insufficient buyer-side evidence to confirm product consistency, after-sales handling, or long-term satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
The presence of Finished Product Inspection and verification supports a basic quality control framework. Nevertheless, the absence of rating data and customer reviews prevents a higher score. The supplier has quality-related platform mechanisms, but lacks visible customer feedback to validate performance in actual purchasing scenarios.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

76 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended.

This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking humic acid, potassium humate, fulvic acid, or amino acid organic fertilizer products from a supplier with visible factory scale, platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, and strong reported delivery performance. It may be particularly suitable for bulk or project-based procurement where factory capacity and transaction security are important.

Main risk points include limited recent order volume, 0 customer reviews, missing store rating data, and insufficient information on customization capability. Buyers should request additional documentation before placing large orders, such as product specifications, COA, inspection reports, factory audit details, production capacity evidence, and sample testing results.

Growth potential is supported by the supplier’s large factory area, 7-year Gold Supplier status, CN¥4.3M+ recent transaction value, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. However, stronger customer feedback and more transparent quality records would be needed to improve procurement confidence further.