zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Qingzhou Haina Fenghui Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Qingzhou Haina Fenghui Garments Co., Ltd.

Qingzhou Haina Fenghui Garments Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Qingzhou Haina Fenghui Garments Co., Ltd. is a China-based garment supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of over 8,400㎡ and more than 90 staff. The supplier appears to operate as a medium-sized manufacturing entity with verified supplier status and a 7-year Gold Supplier history. Its listed products are mainly men’s tactical and outdoor-style shirts, with low MOQ offerings of 1 piece, indicating flexibility for sample orders or small-batch purchasing. Platform credibility is supported by Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and operational indicators such as 95.3% on-time delivery and response time within 2 hours. Business performance is moderate to strong, with 200+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 70+ reviews. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale garment sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, but customization depth and formal product inspection systems require further confirmation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Shandong, China
  • Factory area: 8,400+㎡
  • Employees: 90+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope shown: men’s tactical / outdoor-style shirts

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with more than 8,400㎡ of factory area and over 90 employees. This indicates a meaningful manufacturing footprint rather than a very small trading operation. The verified supplier status further supports the existence and basic credibility of the company’s operating capacity. However, the available data does not provide details on production lines, monthly output, machinery, in-house processes, or capacity utilization, so the evaluation cannot confirm large-scale production capability beyond the disclosed factory size and workforce.

Scoring Rationale

The company appears stronger than a small workshop due to its factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. However, with 90+ employees, it is more appropriate to classify it as a medium-sized factory rather than a large-scale supply chain operator. The absence of detailed production capacity data prevents a higher score in the 18–20 range.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verification status: Verified supplier
  • Certification / platform tags: “On-time delivery 95.3%”, “Response time ≤2h”
  • Other formal certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively long Gold Supplier history of 7 years, which provides a meaningful platform track record. Trade Assurance availability adds transaction protection for buyers, especially for payment and order fulfillment. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform-level credibility. The disclosed tags also show operational transparency in response time and delivery performance. However, the provided information does not include internationally recognized factory certifications, quality management certifications, social compliance audits, or industry-specific compliance documents.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through 7 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are important indicators for platform-based sourcing reliability. The score is not maximized because certification information beyond platform indicators is not available, and the certification/tag structure is limited to operational metrics rather than broader compliance documentation.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction amount in past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 70+

Elaboration

The supplier has generated more than 200 orders in the past six months, which indicates active commercial engagement on the platform. The transaction amount of CN¥540.9K+ shows a measurable and credible sales base, though it does not indicate very high-volume international trade at the scale of top-tier suppliers. A 4.7 store rating is positive, and 70+ reviews provide a reasonable feedback sample, although the review base is not extremely large.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable commercial activity with a moderate-to-strong number of recent orders and transaction value. The 4.7 rating supports buyer satisfaction, while 70+ reviews offer some validation of transaction experience. However, the order and transaction scale does not clearly support classification as a very high-volume supplier, so the score is placed in the upper-middle range rather than the highest band.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Communication efficiency: Indicated by response time ≤2h

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 2 hours suggests reasonably efficient communication and acceptable platform service responsiveness. This is useful for buyers managing sample inquiries, order negotiation, and basic after-sales coordination. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, logo customization, material customization, packaging customization, or design development services.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s response speed is good, but it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. More importantly, there is no confirmed data on Full Customization capability. Therefore, the supplier can be assessed as having normal-to-good service responsiveness, but not enough verified customization capability to justify a top-tier service score.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 95.3%

Elaboration

The reported on-time delivery rate of 95.3% is a strong operational indicator. It suggests that the supplier generally manages order fulfillment timelines effectively on the platform. For procurement teams, this reduces schedule uncertainty, especially for repeat orders or time-sensitive replenishment. However, the data does not provide details on average lead time, production cycle, shipping methods, or performance by order size.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 score range. At 95.3%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability. The score is placed at the top of the range because the disclosed percentage is clearly above the threshold and represents a strong delivery record.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 70+
  • Verified supplier / factory verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Other quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s 4.7 rating indicates generally positive buyer feedback, and 70+ reviews provide a moderate level of customer validation. Verified supplier status also contributes to baseline credibility. However, the available data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, third-party quality inspection procedures, internal QC systems, defect rate tracking, or formal quality management certification. Therefore, while customer feedback is favorable, the documented quality assurance framework is incomplete.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in buyer feedback, supported by a good store rating and a reasonable review count. Factory or supplier verification also strengthens trust. However, the lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or formal quality assurance data limits confidence in systematic quality control. For this reason, the supplier is scored in the good but not top-tier range.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Qingzhou Haina Fenghui Garments Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking men’s tactical or outdoor-style shirt products from a medium-sized Chinese garment supplier with platform credibility, Trade Assurance protection, verified supplier status, and strong delivery performance. The supplier is especially suitable for small-to-medium buyers, sample-based sourcing, low-MOQ purchasing, and buyers who value fast communication and platform-backed transaction security.

Applicable customer types:
- Small and medium-sized apparel importers
- E-commerce sellers testing tactical or outdoor-style shirt products
- Buyers requiring low MOQ sample or trial orders
- Procurement teams seeking a supplier with visible transaction history and delivery reliability

Main risk points:
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection system: Insufficient Data
- Formal quality certifications or compliance audits: Insufficient Data
- Detailed production capacity, monthly output, and equipment information: Insufficient Data

Growth potential:
The supplier shows solid platform maturity, stable recent transaction performance, and strong on-time delivery. If it can provide clearer evidence of customization capability, quality inspection procedures, and formal factory certifications, it could become a stronger candidate for larger-volume or more quality-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Taiqian Haina Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taiqian Haina Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anshan Fenghui Continuous Caster Machine Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anshan Fenghui Continuous Caster Machine Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Qingzhou Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Qingzhou Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Ventimax Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Ventimax Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Guangyuan Greenhouse Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Guangyuan Greenhouse Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Zerui Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Zerui Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Gongle Electric Fan Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Gongle Electric Fan Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Bangchi Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Bangchi Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Huayi Temperature Control Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Huayi Temperature Control Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Boost Temperature Control Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Boost Temperature Control Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinglu Heavy Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinglu Heavy Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Luoluo Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Luoluo Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yaqi Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yaqi Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Senhong Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Senhong Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Suye Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Suye Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meichuang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meichuang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mixextract Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mixextract Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shunling Refrigeration Kitchenware Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shunling Refrigeration Kitchenware Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Karsun Access Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Karsun Access Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Puzhu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Puzhu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Rongta Technology ( Xiamen) Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Rongta Technology ( Xiamen) Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yilutong International Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yilutong International Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sun Rise Exact Industrial Company. Supplier Evaluation
Sun Rise Exact Industrial Company. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Easton Hotel Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Easton Hotel Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Lestar Welding Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Lestar Welding Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hesion Anti-Static Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hesion Anti-Static Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Oulang Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Oulang Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Botou Xintian Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Botou Xintian Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Autoline International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Autoline International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Galaxy Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Galaxy Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Visson Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Visson Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jhr Smart Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jhr Smart Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Pfm Screen Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Pfm Screen Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yu Jiacheng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yu Jiacheng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Superfan Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Superfan Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zoan Gaoke Eelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zoan Gaoke Eelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026