Taiqian Haina Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Supplier Evaluation Report: Taiqian Haina Clothing Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary
Taiqian Haina Clothing Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of over 3,700㎡ and more than 170 staff. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates a medium-scale manufacturing profile with verified supplier status, 6 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and strong recent transaction activity. Its listed products are mainly custom/OEM-style apparel accessories, including 5-panel cap-related items, with low MOQs of 50 pieces, indicating suitability for buyers seeking flexible customization and relatively accessible order quantities. Commercial performance is strong, with 700+ orders and CN¥5.9M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 100+ reviews. Delivery performance is also strong, with a 98.4% on-time shipment rate. Key limitations include insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and no explicit confirmation of Full Customization capability. Overall, this supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized brands, promotional buyers, and custom product importers requiring flexible MOQ and reliable delivery.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength — 20 Points
Basis
- Factory location: Henan, China
- Factory area: 3,700+㎡
- Employees: 170+ staff
- Verified supplier/factory inspection status: True
- Product listings indicate custom/OEM-style products with MOQ of 50 pieces
Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical manufacturing base with over 3,700㎡ of factory area and more than 170 employees. This indicates a meaningful production organization rather than a very small workshop-level supplier. The staff size suggests the company may be capable of handling recurring production orders and maintaining basic operational functions such as production, order handling, and customer service.
The verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of its factory profile. However, the available data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly capacity, machinery list, export markets, or specific factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indicator. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have a stable medium-scale production foundation, the evidence is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale or highly mature supply chain operation.
Scoring Rationale
A factory area of 3,700+㎡ and 170+ staff place the supplier in a mid-sized manufacturing category. The company is not weak in production foundation, and the verified supplier status provides an additional layer of credibility. However, the scale does not clearly indicate a large industrial supplier, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, equipment, or detailed factory certifications. Therefore, the supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale category.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry tags provided:
- Warranty available
- Low MOQ for customization
- OEM for well-known brands
Elaboration
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 6 years, which indicates a relatively established platform presence. Trade Assurance support is also a positive factor, as it provides buyers with transaction protection mechanisms through the platform. Verified supplier status further improves the reliability of the company’s profile and reduces basic supplier identity risk.
The listed tags suggest the supplier highlights warranty availability, low MOQ customization, and OEM-related capability. However, these tags should be interpreted as platform-displayed labels only. The provided data does not include independently verified certifications such as ISO, BSCI, SEDEX, WRAP, or formal compliance audit documents. Therefore, the supplier has strong platform credibility but incomplete evidence of broader third-party compliance certification.
Scoring Rationale
The combination of 6-year Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status forms a solid platform credibility profile. This is stronger than a basic supplier profile and indicates relatively mature use of ’s commercial infrastructure. However, because the provided data does not include detailed third-party factory compliance certificates or formal audit documentation, the score should not reach the absolute maximum.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance — 20 Points
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 700+
- Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥5.9M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Number of reviews: 100+
Elaboration
The supplier shows strong recent business activity. More than 700 orders within six months indicates frequent transaction flow and market acceptance on the platform. A transaction amount exceeding CN¥5.9M also suggests the supplier is not only receiving small trial orders but has accumulated meaningful commercial volume.
The store rating of 4.7 is positive and reflects generally favorable customer feedback. The review count of 100+ provides a reasonable base of buyer feedback, although it is not extremely large compared with highly mature high-volume platform sellers. Overall, the supplier has strong transaction validation and appears commercially active.
Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction value are both strong for a six-month period, supporting a high business performance score. The 4.7 rating is good, though not perfect, and the 100+ review count is sufficient but not exceptionally large. These factors justify a high score, while leaving a small deduction for not having a larger review base or a higher rating.
Final Score
18 / 20
4. Service Capability — 10 Points
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Product information shows custom/OEM-style listings
- Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Explicit Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours is commercially acceptable and indicates relatively active communication. For many procurement scenarios, this level of responsiveness is suitable for quotation follow-up, sample discussion, and order coordination.
The product listings and platform tags indicate customization relevance, including custom designs, embroidery logo references, OEM-style product descriptions, and low MOQ customization. However, the dataset does not explicitly state “Full Customization” support. Therefore, the supplier can be assessed as having basic-to-good customization capability, but not confirmed advanced full customization capability.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier does not meet the highest service capability threshold because the response time is ≤2 hours rather than ≤1 hour, and explicit Full Customization capability is not provided. Nevertheless, the supplier does demonstrate practical service capability through fast response and customization-related product positioning. This supports an upper-mid score within the service category.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points
Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 98.4%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time shipment rate is very strong. A 98.4% rate indicates that most orders are dispatched within the expected timeframe, which is highly important for buyers managing seasonal launches, promotional campaigns, or inventory replenishment.
Based strictly on the provided scoring rule, any on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 98.4%, the supplier is near the top of this range.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier significantly exceeds the 90% benchmark and demonstrates reliable delivery execution based on the available platform data. Since no negative delivery-related information is provided, a full score is justified under the stated scoring framework.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points
Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 100+
- Verified supplier/factory verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.7 store rating, which indicates generally positive customer satisfaction. The presence of 100+ reviews provides a meaningful feedback base, reducing uncertainty compared with suppliers that have few or no reviews. Factory verification also supports baseline quality credibility, as it indicates that the supplier profile has undergone a form of platform verification.
However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection capability or a formal product quality inspection process. There is also no supplied information on defect rate, return rate, quality certifications, laboratory testing, or third-party inspection reports. As a result, quality confidence is good but not fully comprehensive.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves a solid score because it has a good rating, a reasonable review base, and verified supplier status. However, the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality control documentation prevents a top-tier score. The quality profile is positive but not fully validated by complete inspection-system evidence.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 16 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 18 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 18 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 10 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 16 / 20 |
| Total Score | 86 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with controlled order validation.
Taiqian Haina Clothing Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking custom/OEM-style products with relatively low MOQ requirements, especially small to mid-sized brands, promotional product buyers, and importers requiring flexible customization and reliable delivery. The supplier’s 700+ orders and CN¥5.9M+ transaction value in the past six months demonstrate strong commercial validation, while the 98.4% on-time shipment rate is a clear operational advantage.
The main risks are related to incomplete quality-system visibility. Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed, and no detailed third-party compliance certificates or quality audit documents are provided in the dataset. Buyers should therefore request samples, confirm inspection standards, clarify customization scope, and use Trade Assurance for initial orders.
Growth potential appears positive based on strong recent transaction volume, verified supplier status, and 6-year Gold Supplier history. The supplier is a good candidate for repeat cooperation if sample quality, communication, and order consistency are confirmed during trial procurement.
Leave your comment