zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Senhong Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Guangzhou Senhong Garments Co., Ltd.

Guangzhou Senhong Garments Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Senhong Garments Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based apparel supplier offering women’s garment products with relatively low MOQs ranging from 1 set to 100 pieces across the listed products. The company operates from an 870+㎡ facility with 20+ staff and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating basic factory credibility but a relatively small production scale. On , the supplier holds a 1-year Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and carries platform tags including Low MOQ for customization, Finished Product Inspection, and ODM service available. Business activity appears moderate, with 200+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 60+ reviews. Its 100% on-time shipment rate and response time of ≤1 hour are strong indicators of operational responsiveness. This supplier is most suitable for small to medium apparel buyers seeking low-MOQ women’s fashion products, ODM support, and fast communication, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Guangzhou Senhong Garments Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 870+㎡
  • Employees: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a documented factory area of 870+㎡ and a workforce of 20+ staff. This indicates that the company has an operational production base, but the scale is relatively small compared with larger garment manufacturers. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic legitimacy of the company’s operations. However, the provided data does not indicate large-scale production lines, advanced manufacturing capacity, multiple workshops, monthly output, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic production capability supported by a physical facility, staff count, and verified supplier status. However, the factory area and employee scale place it closer to a small-sized apparel supplier rather than a medium or large-scale manufacturer. The company appears capable of handling small to moderate orders, especially given its low MOQ product positioning, but the available data is insufficient to confirm strong mass-production capacity or large-volume stability.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These features provide a basic level of transaction protection and platform-backed credibility. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and ODM service tags further improves confidence in its operational and compliance profile. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the supplier’s long-term platform track record.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The certification and service tags are also relevant to apparel buyers, especially those requiring low MOQ customization and ODM support. Nevertheless, because the Gold Supplier tenure is short, the supplier has not yet demonstrated long-term platform consistency. This places it in the category of a supplier with generally complete but relatively new platform credibility.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Number of reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved 200+ orders over the past six months, which indicates active commercial transactions on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥67.6K+ suggests that the average order size may be relatively modest, consistent with low-MOQ or small-batch garment procurement. A store rating of 4.6 is positive, and 60+ reviews provide some customer feedback base, although the review volume is not large enough to be considered extensive.

Scoring Rationale

The business performance data shows that the supplier is commercially active and has accumulated a reasonable number of recent orders. The rating of 4.6 supports acceptable buyer satisfaction. However, the transaction value is moderate rather than high, and the review count remains limited compared with suppliers that have broader market validation. Therefore, the supplier demonstrates stable but not outstanding business performance.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤1 hour
  • Relevant platform tags:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • ODM service available
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤1 hour is a strong service indicator, especially for buyers who require fast quotation, sampling discussion, or order clarification. The tags “Low MOQ for customization” and “ODM service available” suggest that the supplier can support some degree of product development or customization. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability, so this point cannot be fully credited.

Scoring Rationale

Fast response time is a significant advantage and supports efficient buyer-supplier communication. The supplier also shows evidence of customization-related services through ODM and low MOQ customization tags. However, because Full Customization is not directly stated in the data, the service capability should not be rated at the highest level. The supplier is likely suitable for buyers needing responsive communication and basic-to-moderate customization support, but further confirmation is needed for complex customization projects.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is an excellent delivery performance indicator. This suggests that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has been able to meet shipping timelines effectively. For apparel buyers, especially those working with seasonal fashion items, reliable delivery performance is important for inventory planning and sales scheduling.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the highest score range. With a recorded rate of 100.0%, the supplier demonstrates very strong delivery reliability based on the provided data. No negative delivery indicators were provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 60+
  • Finished product inspection: Present as platform tag
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating, which reflects generally positive customer feedback. The 60+ reviews provide some level of buyer validation, though the volume is not large enough to represent a very extensive customer feedback base. The Finished Product Inspection tag is a relevant quality-control indicator, especially in garment procurement where workmanship, sizing, fabric handling, and finishing are important. Verified supplier status also supports basic credibility, although the data does not provide detailed quality certificates, inspection reports, defect rates, or third-party audit results.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of a good store rating, available customer reviews, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status supports a positive quality assessment. However, the rating is not exceptionally high, and the review count remains moderate. The lack of detailed quality certification or inspection documentation prevents a top-tier score. Overall, the supplier shows a sound basic quality assurance profile suitable for cautious procurement, particularly when buyers use pre-shipment checks or sample approval.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for trial cooperation with controlled order volume.

Guangzhou Senhong Garments Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking women’s apparel products with low MOQ, fast communication, ODM-related service support, and reliable platform transaction protection through Trade Assurance. The supplier is especially appropriate for small to medium-sized fashion retailers, boutique brands, online sellers, and buyers testing new styles or small-batch product launches.

The main risks are its relatively small factory scale, limited Gold Supplier history of only 1 year, moderate review volume, and insufficient data on full customization capability or large-scale production capacity. Buyers planning larger orders should conduct sample testing, confirm production lead times, review quality standards, and consider additional inspection before bulk shipment.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by active recent orders, a 100% on-time shipment rate, fast response speed, and relevant service tags such as ODM service and Finished Product Inspection. If it continues to build transaction history and customer feedback, its procurement reliability could improve further.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Suye Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Suye Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Honghaotian Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Honghaotian Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Luoluo Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Luoluo Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yaqi Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yaqi Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meichuang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meichuang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qiangyu Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qiangyu Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Jiuxing Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Jiuxing Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiaqing Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiaqing Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingguo Xinrong Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingguo Xinrong Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengxing Caps & Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengxing Caps & Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Osbo Textile & Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Osbo Textile & Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Haina Fenghui Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Haina Fenghui Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Charlo Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Charlo Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Xinhui Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Xinhui Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Go-Top Garments&Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Go-Top Garments&Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sanguan Siyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sanguan Siyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hunan Douhe Intelligent Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Douhe Intelligent Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hainan Yiyuantang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hainan Yiyuantang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiyang Beishufu Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiyang Beishufu Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shuaibao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shuaibao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hengfeng Home Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hengfeng Home Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Muyol Hair International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Muyol Hair International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Realkey Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Realkey Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Keorh Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Keorh Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Jiyang Electromechanical Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Jiyang Electromechanical Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan City Nanhai District Songgang Suifa Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan City Nanhai District Songgang Suifa Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoji Xuantai Pigment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoji Xuantai Pigment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Ocan Polymer Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Ocan Polymer Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Hongsean Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Hongsean Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Harvest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Harvest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Soten Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Soten Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jinyu Mechanical And Electrical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jinyu Mechanical And Electrical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianxun Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianxun Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026