Wenzhou Jiuxing Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Wenzhou Jiuxing Garments Co., Ltd. is a China-based garment supplier located in Zhejiang Province, with a reported factory area of 3,500+ m2 and 20+ staff. The supplier appears positioned toward women’s fashion apparel, especially shirts and style-driven garments, with listed products including satin shirts, asymmetrical ruffled items, denim patchwork shirts, Korean-style relaxed-fit women’s apparel, and American retro-style distressed designs. The minimum order quantity shown is 50 pieces, which may suit small-batch buyers, boutique brands, or buyers testing new fashion styles. The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 1 year, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, and Full Customization labels. However, business validation is limited: only 3 orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value in the past six months, with no store rating and 0 reviews. The key concern is delivery reliability, as the on-time shipping rate is only 50.0%.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang Province, China
- Factory area: 3,500+ m2
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical factory scale of over 3,500 m2, which indicates a defined production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the reported workforce of 20+ staff is relatively small, suggesting limited labor capacity compared with larger garment manufacturers. The verified supplier status provides some support for its factory legitimacy, but the data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, machinery count, audit reports, or major factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company shows basic production capability and a verified supplier profile, but the relatively small staff size limits its apparent ability to handle large-volume or highly time-sensitive production. The factory area is reasonable for a small to lower-mid-sized apparel supplier, yet the absence of production capacity figures prevents a stronger assessment. This places the supplier above a weak-capability profile but below a mature medium or large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These elements improve transactional security and reduce basic supplier legitimacy risk. The listed labels also show support for quality checking, warranty availability, ODM, and customization. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, meaning the supplier has limited long-term platform track record based on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The compliance and platform profile is relatively complete in terms of core trust mechanisms, but the short Gold Supplier duration prevents it from reaching the highest credibility tier. The available tags are positive, especially Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization, but no additional third-party factory audit details, ISO certifications, social compliance certifications, or apparel-specific compliance documents are provided.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 3
- Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥13.5K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has limited recent transaction activity on the platform. Three orders over six months and CN¥13.5K+ in transaction value indicate that some business has occurred, but the commercial scale remains low. The absence of a store rating and the 0 review count mean there is no customer-side performance evidence available from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
Business validation is weak because order volume, transaction amount, and review base are all limited. The supplier has some transactional proof, so it should not be treated as completely unverified commercially, but the lack of ratings and reviews makes it difficult to confirm repeatability, buyer satisfaction, or stable order fulfillment performance. This dimension is therefore scored below the basic mid-range threshold.

Final Score
8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service labels indicates that the supplier can support customized apparel requirements to some degree. However, the data does not specify sample development speed, design support depth, technical package handling, language capability, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates a service capability above basic level because it combines timely response with customization-related labels. However, the response time is not within the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour, and the available data does not confirm advanced development or project management capacity. A solid but not top-tier service score is appropriate.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipping rate: 50.0%

Elaboration
Delivery performance is the weakest disclosed area. A 50.0% on-time shipping rate means only half of measured shipments were dispatched on time according to the provided data. For apparel buyers, especially seasonal fashion buyers, delayed shipping can create inventory timing risk, missed launch windows, and increased operational uncertainty.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipping rate below 70% should receive less than 5 points. Since the disclosed rate is materially below that threshold, the supplier presents a clear delivery reliability risk. Even if the number of transactions is small, the available data does not support a stronger delivery assessment.

Final Score
3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, particularly the Finished Product Inspection label and verified supplier status. These suggest that a quality control process or inspection support is available. However, there are no customer reviews and no store rating provided, which means buyer feedback cannot be used to validate product consistency, workmanship, material quality, or after-sales handling.

Scoring Rationale
The presence of Finished Product Inspection prevents the supplier from being scored as having no quality assurance structure. However, the absence of customer ratings and reviews significantly limits confidence in actual delivered quality. The score reflects a supplier with basic quality safeguards but insufficient market feedback to confirm stable quality performance.

Final Score
11 / 20

Total Score

69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended, mainly for small-batch buyers, boutique apparel brands, startup fashion labels, or buyers testing women’s fashion styles with low MOQ requirements. The supplier may be suitable for trial orders involving customized shirts or style-driven women’s apparel, especially where Full Customization, ODM support, and Finished Product Inspection are useful.

The main risks are limited business validation, 0 customer reviews, no disclosed store rating, low recent order volume, and especially the 50.0% on-time shipping rate. Buyers should avoid large or urgent seasonal orders until delivery reliability is proven through trial cooperation.

Growth potential exists because the supplier has a physical factory base, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance, customization capability, and inspection-related labels. A prudent procurement approach would be to start with a small paid sample or pilot order, confirm quality consistency, require clear production timelines, and use Trade Assurance terms before scaling order volume.