Guangzhou Liuyu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Liuyu Garment Co., Ltd. is a China-based garment supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 1,100+㎡ and 60+ staff. The company presents a relatively stable small-to-medium production profile, supported by supplier verification, 11 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including ODM service, minor customization, response time ≤3h, and 97.3% on-time delivery. Its recent business performance is strong, with 300+ orders and CN¥9.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking garment OEM/ODM services, women’s clothing customization, and moderate-volume apparel sourcing with relatively low MOQ options. Key limitations include limited disclosed factory scale, no explicit Full Customization label, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal quality certifications beyond supplier/factory verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: Guangzhou Liuyu Garment Co., Ltd.
• Location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 1,100+㎡
• Employees: 60+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope shown: OEM/ODM garment products and custom sewing services

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed production site of over 1,100㎡ and a workforce of more than 60 employees. This indicates an operational factory with basic to moderate production capacity, rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The presence of supplier verification strengthens its credibility in terms of physical business existence and basic operational validation.

However, based strictly on the provided data, the factory scale is not large. A 1,100+㎡ facility and 60+ employees suggest the supplier is more suitable for small-to-medium garment programs, flexible customization orders, and moderate-volume apparel sourcing rather than very large-scale mass production requiring extensive production lines or large labor capacity. No additional data is provided regarding monthly output, number of production lines, machinery, or advanced factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a real manufacturing base with verified supplier status, which supports confidence in basic production capability. The scale is credible but not large enough to be classified as a major large-scale supply chain factory. The available employee count and factory area support a medium-small factory assessment with stable but not extensive capacity.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform/industry labels:
• ODM service available
• Minor customization
• Response time ≤3h
• On-time delivery 97.3%

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. An 11-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, which is a meaningful credibility signal in supplier screening. Trade Assurance availability further improves buyer protection during transactions. The verified supplier status also supports a higher level of confidence compared with suppliers lacking third-party or platform verification.

The platform labels are also relatively complete for sourcing evaluation, covering ODM availability, customization capability, response speed, and delivery performance. However, the provided data does not list specific international certifications, factory audit reports, compliance standards, or product compliance certificates. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, broader compliance depth cannot be fully confirmed from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several high-value credibility indicators: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and multiple operational labels. The 11-year Gold Supplier record is especially strong. The score is not full because there is insufficient data on formal factory certifications, social compliance audits, or product-specific certifications.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 300+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥9.4M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. More than 300 orders in the past six months indicates active buyer demand and ongoing transaction flow. A transaction value above CN¥9.4M over the same period suggests that the supplier is not only receiving orders but also generating meaningful sales volume.

The store rating of 4.9 is high, and the 100+ reviews provide a useful feedback base. This combination supports the conclusion that the supplier has been commercially validated by multiple buyers. Compared with suppliers that have low transaction history or limited review counts, Guangzhou Liuyu Garment Co., Ltd. demonstrates stronger market acceptance on the platform.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s order count, transaction value, rating, and review volume are all positive. The 300+ recent orders and CN¥9.4M+ transaction volume represent solid business traction. The 4.9 rating further supports positive buyer experience. The score is placed near the top range, though not full, because the data does not provide deeper breakdowns such as repeat buyer ratio, dispute rate, refund rate, or category-specific order performance.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Platform label: Response time ≤3h
• Platform label: ODM service available
• Platform label: Minor customization
• Product information includes custom sewing services
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing. This is not the fastest service level, as the scoring benchmark gives the highest range to suppliers responding within one hour, but it remains commercially workable for most procurement communication cycles.

The supplier also supports ODM service and minor customization. This is valuable for buyers requiring product adaptation, style development, or garment modification. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. The available customization evidence supports basic to moderate customization, but not a fully comprehensive customization service assessment.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates practical service capability through ODM availability, minor customization, and a response time within three hours. However, the lack of explicit Full Customization confirmation limits the score. The service profile is suitable for buyers requiring standard OEM/ODM communication and minor apparel customization, but the data does not prove advanced end-to-end custom development capacity.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 97.3%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 97.3% is strong. According to the scoring standard, suppliers with on-time delivery above 90% qualify for the 9–10 point range. A 97.3% rate indicates that the supplier has a reliable delivery record on the platform.

For procurement purposes, this is a positive indicator, especially in apparel sourcing where delivery reliability directly affects seasonal launches, inventory planning, and retail timelines. No additional data is provided on average lead time, urgent order handling, or shipping method performance, but the available on-time delivery percentage is clearly favorable.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier exceeds the 90% benchmark by a significant margin. Based strictly on the provided figure, delivery performance is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. The score is set at the maximum level because the stated on-time delivery rate is 97.3%.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 100+
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory Verification: True / supplier verification provided
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Product quality-related wording: “High Quality” appears in product title, but no independent quality certification is provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong customer feedback profile, with a 4.9 store rating and more than 100 reviews. This provides a meaningful reference base for buyer satisfaction. The verified supplier status also adds a basic layer of quality and operational credibility, as it confirms a level of platform-backed supplier validation.

However, the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, third-party quality inspection procedures, product testing standards, or formal quality management certifications. While the feedback indicators are positive, the absence of disclosed inspection systems limits the depth of quality assurance evaluation. The phrase “High Quality” in the product title is not treated as independent evidence of quality control.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating and review count support a strong score, and supplier verification provides additional confidence. Nevertheless, the lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection data prevents a top-tier quality score. The supplier appears to have good customer satisfaction, but the quality assurance system is not fully documented in the provided dataset.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for small-to-medium apparel sourcing projects.

Guangzhou Liuyu Garment Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for OEM/ODM garment supply, women’s clothing customization, and moderate-volume procurement with relatively accessible MOQs such as 50–100 pieces based on the listed products. The supplier’s strongest advantages are its 11-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, strong recent transaction performance, high store rating, and excellent 97.3% on-time delivery rate.

The main risks are related to limited disclosed production scale, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and no explicit confirmation of Full Customization capability. Buyers with strict compliance, large-scale production, or advanced quality documentation requirements should request additional factory audit reports, inspection procedures, production capacity details, and sample approval records before placing bulk orders.

Overall, the supplier shows strong platform credibility and commercial validation, with good growth potential for buyers seeking flexible garment manufacturing rather than highly complex or very large-scale production programs.