zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Sanmian Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Sanmian Garment Co., Ltd. is a China-based garment supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 2,500+ m² and 50+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-mid-sized apparel manufacturer with basic verified supplier backing and active platform participation. Its product listings indicate low MOQ options of 2 pieces across several men’s shirt/casual garment categories, which may suit small-batch buyers, trial orders, boutique sourcing, or buyers testing designs before scaling. Platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status, although the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year. Business performance shows 100+ orders and CN¥60.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.5 store rating and 20+ reviews, suggesting moderate commercial validation rather than large-scale market proof. The supplier’s strongest measurable indicators are fast response time and 94.5% on-time delivery. Key limitations include insufficient data on full customization capability, finished product inspection, and broader certification coverage.

Guangzhou Sanmian Garment Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Guangzhou Sanmian Garment Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 2,500+ m²
  • Employees: 50+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory footprint of over 2,500 m² and a workforce of more than 50 employees. For an apparel supplier, this indicates a basic operating scale with internal production capacity, but the available data does not support classification as a large-scale manufacturing base. The presence of verified supplier status provides some additional confidence that the company has undergone a degree of platform or supplier verification. However, there is no provided information on annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery, monthly output, factory audit details, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates sufficient physical and staffing capacity to support small-to-medium apparel procurement requirements. The verified supplier status strengthens its credibility compared with unverified small sellers. However, the factory size and employee count are not large enough, based on the provided data, to justify a high score associated with a large-scale stable supply chain. The lack of detailed production scale data also limits confidence in high-volume fulfillment capability.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤1h”, “On-time delivery 94.5%”

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are positive signals for buyers seeking a basic level of platform-backed transaction security. Trade Assurance is especially relevant for procurement risk control, as it can provide a structured transaction framework. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the strength of long-term platform credibility. The available tags mainly relate to responsiveness and delivery performance rather than broader compliance or product certification coverage.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core platform trust signals in place, but the short Gold Supplier history prevents it from being assessed as a long-established platform supplier. Certification information is also limited; no industry-specific product certifications, social compliance audits, or quality management system certifications are provided. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of having core platform credibility but not a complete or long-term compliance profile.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥60.8K+
  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders over the past six months, showing active transaction history on the platform. The reported transaction value of CN¥60.8K+ indicates commercial activity, although it is not high enough to demonstrate large-scale transaction volume. The store rating of 4.5 is generally positive, while the review count of 20+ provides some customer feedback but remains limited in sample size.

Scoring Rationale

The order count is a positive indicator and suggests the supplier is not inactive or purely newly listed. However, the transaction amount is moderate, and the number of reviews is not large enough to strongly validate consistent buyer satisfaction across a broad customer base. The 4.5 rating supports a favorable but not exceptional performance assessment. Overall, the supplier shows stable but mid-level business performance.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤1h
  • Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a response time of less than or equal to one hour, which is a strong service indicator for online procurement. Fast response is particularly valuable for buyers managing sample confirmation, quotation comparison, order clarification, and delivery coordination. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private label services, OEM/ODM development, packaging customization, or design modification.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed meets the highest service-response benchmark. However, because Full Customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be scored as having strong end-to-end service capability. The current evidence supports good communication efficiency but only limited confirmation of customization depth.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 94.5%

Elaboration

The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 94.5%, which is above the 90% benchmark for strong delivery reliability. This suggests that the supplier has demonstrated good fulfillment discipline within the available platform data. For buyers placing small or repeat orders, this delivery performance is a positive operational signal.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. The supplier’s 94.5% rate is clearly within the strong delivery performance band. However, without additional data on average lead time, peak-season performance, shipping methods, or order complexity, a full 10-point score is not assigned.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Reviews: 20+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided as True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.5 store rating, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The review count of 20+ provides some evidence of buyer experience, but the sample size is still relatively limited. Verified supplier status supports a basic quality and identity assurance layer, but there is no provided confirmation of Finished Product Inspection, formal QC procedures, third-party inspection support, defect rate, return rate, or quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has positive customer feedback and some verification backing, which supports a reasonable quality confidence level. However, the limited number of reviews and absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevent the supplier from being assessed as having a fully mature quality assurance system. The quality profile is acceptable for cautious sourcing, but buyers should still verify samples and inspection arrangements before scaling orders.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 15 / 20
Business Performance 14 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Guangzhou Sanmian Garment Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium apparel sourcing, low-MOQ trial orders, sample-based purchasing, or flexible small-batch procurement. The supplier’s low MOQ of 2 pieces, fast response time, Trade Assurance support, and 94.5% on-time delivery rate make it appropriate for initial testing and controlled purchasing programs.

Suitable customer types:
- Small apparel retailers
- Boutique buyers
- E-commerce sellers testing product lines
- Buyers requiring low MOQ garment sourcing
- Procurement teams seeking sample or pilot orders before larger commitments

Main risk points:
- Gold Supplier history is only 1 year
- Limited transaction value: CN¥60.8K+ in the past 6 months
- Review base is moderate at 20+ reviews
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection system: Insufficient Data
- No provided information on production lines, monthly capacity, formal quality certifications, or detailed factory audit results

Growth potential:
The supplier shows reasonable growth potential due to active platform transactions, verified supplier status, fast communication, and strong on-time delivery performance. If future data confirms stronger customization ability, more reviews, higher transaction volume, and formal inspection processes, the supplier’s procurement attractiveness could improve further. For now, cooperation should begin with sample orders or small-batch orders, followed by quality checks before scaling.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qinglai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qinglai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Linhui Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Linhui Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Liuyu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Liuyu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Enchi Garment Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Enchi Garment Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yiti Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yiti Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Longze Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Longze Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanyang Fanxi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanyang Fanxi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jingxin Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jingxin Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Huankai Microbial Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Huankai Microbial Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Relied Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Relied Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Feili Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Feili Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hohhot Sona Cashmere Product Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hohhot Sona Cashmere Product Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jiayu Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jiayu Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Julu Yuanjia Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Julu Yuanjia Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Cantell Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Cantell Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shengchun Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shengchun Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lengshuijiang Songye Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lengshuijiang Songye Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jiahexin Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jiahexin Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Xuvol Construction Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Xuvol Construction Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hengxin Thread Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hengxin Thread Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Wish Housing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Wish Housing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingyuan Holding Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingyuan Holding Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dong Guan  Hongli Craftworks Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dong Guan Hongli Craftworks Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Liancheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Liancheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026