zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Chenyu Clothes And Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Chenyu Clothes And Accessories Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based apparel supplier focused on men’s shirts, T-shirts, linen/cotton shirts, plus-size shirts, and resort/formal breathable shirt products. Based on the provided data, the supplier operates with a relatively small production base of 640+ m² and 20+ staff, but it has supplier verification status, 5 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and a strong reported on-time delivery rate of 96.7%. Its recent commercial performance appears moderate, with 100+ orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating but only 10+ reviews. The supplier is best suited for buyers seeking low-to-medium volume apparel sourcing, flexible MOQ options, and platform-protected transactions. Key limitations include limited scale, limited review volume, and insufficient data on formal quality inspection systems such as Finished Product Inspection.

Guangzhou Chenyu Clothes And Accessories Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Guangzhou Chenyu Clothes And Accessories Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 640+ m²
  • Employees: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
  • Product scope provided: men’s casual shirts, formal breathable shirts, T-shirts, linen cotton shirts, plus-size shirts

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical production base with a stated factory area of 640+ m² and a workforce of 20+ staff. This indicates that the company has basic operational capacity for apparel production, but the scale is relatively small compared with larger garment manufacturers that usually operate with significantly larger facilities and higher staffing levels.

The presence of supplier verification is a positive indicator because it provides some level of third-party or platform-backed credibility regarding the company’s existence and operating status. However, the available data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly output, machinery lists, annual capacity, export markets, or factory audit reports. Therefore, its true production scalability cannot be fully confirmed from the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and verified supplier status, which supports its reliability as a small-scale apparel supplier. However, the factory size of 640+ m² and 20+ staff place it closer to a small factory or workshop-scale operation rather than a large or mid-sized production base. Because there is no detailed production capacity data, no machinery information, and no evidence of large-scale factory certifications beyond verification status, the score should remain within the “small but basic production capability” range.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform / certification labels:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Response time ≤3h
  • On-time delivery 96.7%

Elaboration

The supplier has several platform credibility indicators. A 5-year Gold Supplier history suggests a sustained presence on rather than a newly established platform account. Trade Assurance support is also important for procurement risk management because it provides buyers with a platform-supported transaction protection mechanism.

The supplier also has verification status, which strengthens credibility compared with unverified suppliers. The listed platform tags further support operational transparency, particularly regarding delivery performance and response time. However, the data does not mention internationally recognized compliance certifications, social compliance audits, product compliance certificates, or industry-specific apparel certifications. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but broader compliance depth remains unclear.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a solid platform credibility profile: 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, supplier verification, and relevant operational tags. These factors provide meaningful assurance for online sourcing. The reason the score is not at the maximum level is that the provided data does not include additional compliance certificates, factory audit reports, social compliance records, or product testing documentation. Still, within the platform context, the supplier shows strong credibility.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.4M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Number of reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded 100+ orders over the past six months, which indicates active commercial engagement on the platform. The reported transaction value of CN¥1.4M+ suggests a meaningful level of recent sales activity. For apparel products with relatively low unit prices and MOQs ranging from 2 pieces to 100 pieces depending on product type, this transaction value indicates that the supplier has achieved a reasonable level of platform-based business performance.

The store rating of 4.7 is positive, showing generally favorable buyer feedback. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of the rating. A higher review base would provide stronger validation of customer satisfaction across more transactions and buyer profiles.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable commercial activity with 100+ recent orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value, which supports a medium-level business performance assessment. The 4.7 rating is favorable, but the relatively low number of reviews prevents the score from reaching the high-performance range. The business data supports the conclusion that the supplier is commercially active and moderately validated, but not yet strongly proven through a large volume of public customer feedback.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Platform label: Response time ≤3h
  • Platform label: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of ≤3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online procurement. This response level is suitable for standard inquiries, quotation requests, and routine order coordination. The “Low MOQ for customization” label suggests some level of customization flexibility, especially for buyers testing new designs or small batch apparel sourcing.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. There is also no information on design support, sample development lead time, OEM/ODM capability, pattern-making capability, packaging customization, or dedicated account management. Therefore, the supplier’s service capability can be considered functional, but not fully proven as a strong customization partner.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs reasonably well in communication responsiveness, with a response time within three hours. The low MOQ customization label is positive, but without explicit confirmation of Full Customization, the service capability should be scored in the normal-to-basic customization range. The score reflects acceptable service responsiveness but limited evidence of advanced customization or project-management capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 96.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 96.7% is a strong delivery performance indicator. According to the scoring standard, a rate above 90% falls within the 9–10 point range. This level of delivery reliability is particularly important for apparel buyers managing seasonal collections, promotional schedules, or replenishment cycles.

The data does not provide details on average lead time, shipping methods, delayed order cases, or production scheduling capacity. However, the available on-time delivery percentage is clearly strong and directly supports a high delivery score.

Scoring Rationale

With an on-time delivery rate of 96.7%, the supplier exceeds the 90% benchmark for top-tier delivery performance. Although additional delivery data would strengthen the assessment, the provided metric is strong enough to justify a near-maximum score. The score reflects the supplier’s demonstrated ability to meet shipment timing expectations based on the stated platform data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 10+
  • Verified supplier / factory verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Product categories: men’s shirts, T-shirts, linen cotton shirts, plus-size shirts

Elaboration

The supplier’s 4.7 store rating indicates generally positive customer feedback. This is a favorable sign for quality perception, order handling, and buyer satisfaction. The verified supplier status also provides a basic level of quality-related confidence because it confirms some degree of supplier validation.

However, the review count is relatively limited at 10+, which means the customer feedback base is not large enough to strongly validate consistent quality performance across many buyers or repeated transactions. In addition, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, inspection reports, AQL standards, fabric testing, or third-party quality assurance systems. Therefore, the supplier has positive but limited quality validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a moderate-to-good quality score due to its 4.7 rating, verified supplier status, and active transaction record. However, the low review volume and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevent a higher score. The available evidence supports basic quality confidence, but not a fully developed or independently verified quality assurance system.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Guangzhou Chenyu Clothes And Accessories Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume apparel sourcing, especially for men’s shirts, T-shirts, linen/cotton shirts, plus-size shirts, and related casual or resortwear products. The supplier is particularly suitable for buyers who value low MOQ options, Trade Assurance, responsive communication within three hours, and strong reported delivery performance.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium apparel retailers
- E-commerce sellers
- Buyers testing new men’s apparel SKUs
- Customers requiring flexible MOQ sourcing
- Buyers who prefer Trade Assurance protection

Main risk points:
- Small factory scale: 640+ m² and 20+ staff
- Limited review base: only 10+ reviews
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- No provided data on monthly capacity, machinery, production lines, or formal quality certifications

Growth potential:
The supplier has a solid platform foundation, 5 years of Gold Supplier history, CN¥1.4M+ recent transaction value, and a strong 96.7% on-time delivery rate. If it can provide clearer quality control documentation, inspection procedures, and production capacity details, it could become a more reliable long-term apparel sourcing partner for larger or repeat procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongbao Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongbao Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Fuzhixiang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Fuzhixiang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kaqidun Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kaqidun Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunz Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunz Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Fuch Clothes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Fuch Clothes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huadu Area Mosun Auto Accessories Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huadu Area Mosun Auto Accessories Factory Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Xinfeng Clothes-Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Xinfeng Clothes-Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Unity 4Wd Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Unity 4Wd Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Accessories Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Accessories Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yane Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yane Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Sanqiang Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Sanqiang Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Chuanruida Clothing Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Chuanruida Clothing Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Honghang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Honghang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ijoe Fashion And Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ijoe Fashion And Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jincong Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jincong Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xinyibang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xinyibang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dingzhou Ruifeng Diamond Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dingzhou Ruifeng Diamond Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhuhai Yuxun Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Yuxun Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan United Star Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan United Star Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tengzhou Huamao Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tengzhou Huamao Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Huayu Vehicle Leaf Spring Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Huayu Vehicle Leaf Spring Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Honest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Honest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bluesun Outdoor Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bluesun Outdoor Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Jinda Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Jinda Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Huankai Microbial Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Huankai Microbial Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bobo Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bobo Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Macon New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Macon New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Hongtong Bioenergy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Hongtong Bioenergy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhouya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhouya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Linfei Woolen Felt Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Linfei Woolen Felt Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan City Fine Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan City Fine Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Ecare Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Ecare Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sincereal Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sincereal Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Youhao Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Youhao Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Rayco Audio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Rayco Audio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026