Changzhou Jinda Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Changzhou Jinda Electronics Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of over 9,100㎡ and more than 80 staff. Based on the available data, the company appears to be a medium-sized manufacturing supplier focused on automotive electrical components such as car fuses, fuse holders, fuse sets, and related panel-mount or inline fuse products. Its strongest advantages are long platform presence, 23 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Business performance shows some commercial validation, with 9 orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review base is limited to only 2 reviews. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking automotive fuse-related products from an established platform supplier with stable delivery performance, while buyers requiring deeper quality documentation, customization confirmation, or larger-scale transaction history should conduct further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 9,100+㎡
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified/audited supplier: True
- Location: Jiangsu, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a reported factory size above 9,100㎡ and more than 80 employees, indicating a meaningful production base rather than a very small trading operation. The available data also identifies the supplier as verified/audited, which strengthens confidence in its physical operating presence. However, the staff size remains moderate, and there is no additional data on production lines, annual capacity, equipment, or factory management certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company fits the profile of a stable medium-sized factory. Its factory area and employee count support basic-to-moderate production capability, while verified supplier status improves reliability. It does not reach the highest score range because the data does not show large-scale workforce size, detailed production capacity, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 23 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: “Response time ≤7h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified/audited supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through 23 years as an Gold Supplier, which is a significant indicator of long-term platform continuity. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers. Verified supplier status further supports platform trustworthiness. However, the provided certification/industry labels mainly relate to response time and delivery performance rather than broader product, factory, or quality system certifications.

Scoring Rationale
This is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions. A 23-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status provide substantial credibility. The score is slightly below full marks because the data does not include a complete set of compliance or industry certifications beyond platform-based indicators.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 9
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded transactions within the past six months, with 9 orders and CN¥270.4K+ in transaction value. This suggests actual commercial activity and a certain level of buyer acceptance. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count is only 2, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The order count is not high, but the transaction value indicates that some orders may have meaningful purchasing volume.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is moderate. The supplier has verifiable recent transaction activity and a strong rating, but the limited number of orders and very small review base prevent it from being assessed as a high-volume, strongly market-validated supplier. The transaction value supports a stable middle-range score rather than a low score.

Final Score
14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤7h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s listed response time of within 7 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. No data is provided regarding Full Customization, design support, OEM/ODM capability, engineering assistance, or multilingual sales support.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates normal service responsiveness but lacks evidence of advanced customization capability. Because Full Customization information is unavailable, the score remains in the basic-to-normal service capability range rather than the high-performance range.

Final Score
6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery-related indicator provided. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance within the available platform data. No additional information is provided on average lead time, logistics methods, urgent order handling, or historical shipment dispute rates.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score in this dimension.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2
- Verified/audited supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on provided verified/audited supplier data

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, but this is based on only 2 reviews, which is too limited to fully validate consistent customer satisfaction. Verified/audited supplier status provides some assurance regarding supplier legitimacy and factory presence. However, there is no specific evidence of Finished Product Inspection, quality control process, defect rate, product testing standards, or formal quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has positive but limited customer feedback. The verified/audited status supports baseline quality confidence, while the lack of Finished Product Inspection data and low review volume reduce the reliability of quality assessment. Therefore, the supplier is rated as having good basic quality indicators but insufficient evidence for a premium quality score.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Changzhou Jinda Electronics Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing automotive fuse-related products who value long platform history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and strong delivery reliability. It is suitable for small to medium procurement programs, sample orders, and repeat purchases where product specifications can be clearly confirmed before ordering.

Key risks include limited review volume, only 9 recent orders, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and no provided evidence of Full Customization capability. Before larger-volume procurement, buyers should request product test reports, inspection procedures, production capacity details, and sample validation. The supplier shows good growth potential due to its long presence, stable factory base, and 100.0% on-time delivery record.