Changzhou Dengyue Polymer Group Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Changzhou Dengyue Polymer Group Co.,Ltd

Executive Summary

Changzhou Dengyue Polymer Group Co.,Ltd is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 5,500+㎡ and 80+ staff. The company offers polymer-related protective edge and bumper products, including anti-collision strip bumper edges, EVA foam bumper guards, and door guard edge products. Based on the available data, the supplier demonstrates a stable mid-sized production profile supported by factory supplier verification, 17 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform tags including Full Customization and Minor Customization. Its recent business activity is relatively solid, with 100+ orders and CN¥2.5M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the store rating of 4.5 and 20+ reviews indicate moderate customer feedback volume rather than extensive market validation. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale, customizable protective strip and edge guard products, especially those requiring platform-backed transaction protection. Key risks include limited review depth and insufficient disclosed quality inspection details.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Jiangsu, China
• Factory area: 5,500+㎡
• Staff size: 80+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory verification status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory footprint of over 5,500 square meters and a workforce of more than 80 employees. This indicates a physical operating base beyond a small trading-only setup. The staff size and factory area suggest a mid-sized manufacturing operation with basic production organization and operational stability. The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens confidence that the company has undergone at least some level of platform or supplier verification.

However, the available data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly output, equipment lists, annual capacity, R&D staffing, warehouse scale, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company appears to have a credible production base, the data is insufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The 5,500+㎡ facility and 80+ staff provide evidence of established production capability, and the verified supplier status adds credibility. Nevertheless, the lack of detailed production capacity, equipment information, and formal factory audit documentation limits the score from reaching the top range.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier tenure: 17 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verification status: True
• Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Socially responsible, Minor customization, Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong platform credibility. A 17-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status improves confidence in the legitimacy of the business profile. The available tags also indicate some compliance and service-related positioning, including warranty availability and socially responsible labeling.

However, the data does not provide specific third-party certifications such as ISO, product safety certifications, environmental certificates, or detailed audit documentation. Therefore, the evaluation should distinguish between platform credibility and formal compliance certification. The platform record is strong, while external certification evidence is not sufficiently disclosed.

Scoring Rationale

This dimension scores highly because the supplier has long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and multiple platform tags. A 17-year platform history is a strong credibility signal. The score is not a full 20 because the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports or internationally recognized compliance certificates.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2.5M+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Number of reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded over 100 orders and more than CN¥2.5 million in transaction value over the past six months, which indicates active recent commercial performance. This level of transaction activity suggests that the supplier is not merely listed on the platform but has measurable sales conversion and buyer engagement.

The store rating of 4.5 is acceptable but not exceptionally high. The review count of 20+ provides some customer feedback basis, but the volume is still relatively limited compared with suppliers that have hundreds or thousands of reviews. Therefore, while commercial performance appears stable, the depth of customer-side validation remains moderate.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid transaction activity, with both order count and transaction value reaching a meaningful level. However, the rating is moderate rather than outstanding, and the number of reviews is limited. This supports a score in the stable mid-to-upper range, but not the highest tier reserved for suppliers with very high order volume, high transaction value, excellent ratings, and extensive review history.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Customization tags: Minor customization, Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier reports a response time of within three hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication. The presence of both Minor Customization and Full Customization tags indicates that the supplier may support customized product requirements within the scope represented on the platform.

However, the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of one hour or less. In addition, while Full Customization is listed, the data does not provide further details such as customization workflow, sample lead time, engineering support, mold development capability, packaging customization, or dedicated account management. Therefore, the service capability appears solid but cannot be confirmed as highly advanced based only on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives a good service score because it supports Full Customization and responds within a reasonable time window. The score is not in the 9–10 range because the response time is not ≤1 hour, and the data does not include deeper evidence of advanced customization service processes.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 88.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 88.7%. This falls within the 80%–89% range, indicating acceptable but not excellent delivery reliability. For buyers with flexible delivery schedules, this level may be manageable. However, for buyers operating strict replenishment cycles, retail launch deadlines, or production-line supply programs, the delivery performance should be monitored carefully.

The available data does not include average lead time, late shipment reasons, seasonal capacity fluctuation, logistics methods, or historical delivery trend. Therefore, the assessment is based solely on the disclosed on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to a score of 7–8. At 88.7%, the supplier is close to the upper boundary of this range, so a score of 8 is justified. However, it does not qualify for the 9–10 range because the rate is below 90%.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 20+
• Factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.5 and more than 20 reviews. This provides some evidence of customer feedback, but the review base is not large enough to be considered highly comprehensive. The rating is positive but not at the highest level. Factory verification adds a degree of confidence regarding the supplier’s operational legitimacy and basic manufacturing presence.

However, the available data does not confirm whether the supplier provides Finished Product Inspection. There is also no disclosed information about internal QC procedures, defect rate, inspection standards, laboratory testing, product compliance testing, or quality certificates. As a result, the supplier’s quality assurance structure cannot be fully verified from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality credibility through factory verification and a reasonably positive store rating. However, the limited review count and absence of disclosed Finished Product Inspection information prevent a higher score. The supplier appears to have acceptable quality feedback, but the quality assurance system is not sufficiently documented to support a top-tier evaluation.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Changzhou Dengyue Polymer Group Co.,Ltd is suitable for buyers seeking protective bumper strips, EVA foam guards, door edge guards, and related polymer protective products from a mid-sized Chinese supplier with strong platform credibility. The supplier is particularly suitable for buyers who value Trade Assurance, long-term Gold Supplier status, verified supplier background, and customization availability.

Suitable customer types include:
- Small to medium importers requiring customizable protective edge products
- E-commerce sellers sourcing bumper strips or door guard products
- Distributors seeking moderate-volume procurement with platform-backed transaction protection
- Buyers who can manage quality confirmation through samples and pre-shipment checks

Main risk points:
- On-time delivery rate is 88.7%, acceptable but below the 90% high-performance threshold
- Store rating of 4.5 and 20+ reviews provide moderate, not extensive, customer validation
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Detailed production capacity, equipment, QC processes, and formal certifications are not disclosed

Growth potential:
The supplier shows meaningful growth potential due to its 17-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, active six-month transaction performance, and customization capability. If the company can provide stronger quality documentation, more transparent inspection procedures, and improved delivery performance above 90%, it could become a more reliable option for larger or more quality-sensitive procurement programs.