Ningbo Haoyue Fan Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ningbo Haoyue Fan Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering centrifugal fan-related products and components with listed MOQs ranging from 1 piece to 700 pieces. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale manufacturing supplier with a reported factory area of 3,500+ m² and 10+ staff. It has Gold Supplier status for 4 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a reasonable platform credibility foundation. However, its recent business performance is limited, with 10 orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is 5.0, but only 3 reviews are available, so customer feedback depth is insufficient. Delivery performance is a key concern, with an on-time delivery rate of 75.0%. This supplier may be suitable for small-volume trial orders, component sourcing, or buyers requiring flexible MOQ options, but larger procurement programs should proceed with caution.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 3,500+ m²
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Country/region: China, Zhejiang
- Product scope shown: centrifugal fan-related products and components

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical manufacturing base of 3,500+ m², which indicates a basic production environment rather than a large-scale industrial facility. The reported workforce of 10+ staff suggests a relatively small operating team. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic legitimacy of the business, but the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly output, equipment list, R&D capacity, or factory audit documentation beyond the verification indicator.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability through its factory area and verified supplier status. However, the small staff size limits the evidence for large-scale production stability. Since there is no data on production capacity, automation level, annual output, or major factory certifications, the supplier should be assessed as a small but operational manufacturer rather than a mature large-scale supply chain partner.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Platform tags: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 75.0%”

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. A 4-year Gold Supplier history provides a moderate level of platform continuity. However, the certification and industry tag information is limited to response time and delivery performance. No specific international product certifications, management system certifications, or finished product inspection label are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core credibility elements needed for basic buyer protection and platform trust. Four years as a Gold Supplier is meaningful but not long-term enough to support the highest credibility tier. The absence of detailed certification labels or compliance documentation prevents a stronger score. Overall, platform credibility is solid but not comprehensive.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded recent platform transactions, which confirms some level of commercial activity. However, 10 orders over six months indicates limited order volume, and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value is relatively modest. The store rating of 5.0 is positive, but the rating is based on only 3 reviews, which is too limited to strongly validate consistent buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
The business data shows that the supplier is active but not highly proven by transaction scale. The high rating supports a positive initial impression, but the small review base reduces reliability. The supplier does not demonstrate high-volume order traction or broad customer validation based on the provided figures.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤3h”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for routine inquiries. This is suitable for buyers who need timely quotation clarification or order discussion. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM development, engineering modification, packaging customization, or project-based technical support.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs reasonably on response speed, but it does not meet the top service tier because response time is not within 1 hour and customization capability is not confirmed. Based only on the available data, service capability should be considered functional but not strongly differentiated.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 75.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 75.0% indicates that one out of four orders may face delayed shipment based on the available platform metric. This level is below the preferred threshold for buyers managing strict replenishment cycles, project timelines, or production schedules.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 70% and 79% falls into the 5–6 point range. A 75.0% rate is acceptable only for low-urgency or flexible procurement scenarios, but it represents a clear operational risk for time-sensitive sourcing.

Final Score
6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier marked as True

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, but this is supported by only 3 reviews, which is not enough to establish a strong quality track record. Verified supplier status provides some confidence in basic supplier legitimacy, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, defect control processes, inspection reports, or recognized quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The available feedback is positive but statistically limited. The lack of finished product inspection data and broader quality assurance evidence prevents a high score. The supplier has basic quality credibility through verification and rating, but customer feedback volume and quality control transparency remain insufficient.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

66 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-scale sourcing, trial orders, sample evaluation, or buyers seeking centrifugal fan-related products with flexible MOQ options. The supplier has acceptable platform credibility through 4 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status.

However, it is not yet recommended as a primary supplier for large-volume or time-sensitive procurement without further verification. Main risks include limited employee scale, low recent transaction volume, only 3 customer reviews, insufficient quality inspection data, and a 75.0% on-time delivery rate.

Suitable customer types include small importers, maintenance parts buyers, distributors testing new SKUs, and buyers able to tolerate flexible delivery schedules. Growth potential exists if the supplier improves delivery reliability, increases transaction volume, and provides clearer evidence of quality control, inspection capability, and customization support.