Jieyang City Jiedong Xichang Town Mingao Glasses Factory Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Jieyang City Jiedong Xichang Town Mingao Glasses Factory
Country/Region: Guangdong, China
Product Category Observed: Sunglasses / fashion eyewear products

Executive Summary

Jieyang City Jiedong Xichang Town Mingao Glasses Factory is a small-scale but commercially active eyewear supplier based in Guangdong, China. The company reports a factory area of 520+㎡ and 30+ staff, indicating a limited but functional production base. It is listed as a verified supplier and operates as a 3-year Gold Supplier with Trade Assurance support, which provides a reasonable level of platform credibility. Its recent commercial performance is strong relative to its scale, with 1,000+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 300+ reviews. Delivery performance is a major strength, with a reported 99.7% on-time delivery rate. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ, price-accessible fashion sunglasses, especially trial orders, small-batch procurement, or fast-moving e-commerce inventory. Key limitations include small factory scale and insufficient data on customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 13 / 20

Basis

• Factory area: 520+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product range shown: multiple sunglasses/fashion eyewear listings
• Factory certification beyond supplier verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical manufacturing base with a reported factory area of over 520 square meters and more than 30 employees. This indicates that the company has basic production capability and is not merely represented as a trading storefront based on the provided data. The presence of multiple eyewear product listings also suggests operational continuity in the sunglasses category.

However, the scale remains relatively small. A 520+㎡ facility and 30+ staff do not indicate a large industrial production base or high-capacity manufacturing system. While the supplier is marked as verified, there is no additional data showing advanced factory certifications, large-scale production lines, capacity figures, export volume, or third-party factory audit reports beyond the verification status.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the category of a small but functional factory with basic production capability. The verified supplier status supports credibility, but the limited factory area and employee count restrict its score from reaching the medium or large-scale supplier range. The lack of detailed production capacity and factory certification data also prevents a higher assessment.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 16 / 20

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Supplier verification: True
• Listed platform/industry tags:
• Finished product inspection
• On-time delivery 99.7%
• Response time ≤3h

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. A 3-year Gold Supplier status shows that the company has maintained a platform presence for a moderate period. Trade Assurance support is also a positive procurement protection mechanism, especially for buyers managing order security, payment protection, and dispute handling.

The presence of supplier verification further strengthens platform reliability. The listed tags include finished product inspection, delivery performance, and response time, which provide additional operational transparency. However, the Gold Supplier duration is still relatively short compared with long-established suppliers, and no external compliance certifications, export certifications, or product compliance documents are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. These support a stable level of trust for online procurement. The score is not higher because the Gold Supplier history is only 3 years and the available compliance information is platform-level rather than a broader certification system.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 18 / 20

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 1,000+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥608.5K+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 300+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong recent business activity. More than 1,000 orders within six months indicates consistent buyer demand and active transaction flow. A transaction value above CN¥608.5K also shows that the supplier has achieved meaningful sales volume on the platform.

The store rating of 4.5 is acceptable and commercially viable, though not at the very top performance level. The 300+ reviews provide a reasonable feedback base, reducing uncertainty compared with suppliers that have very few buyer reviews. Overall, the business performance data suggests the supplier has been tested by multiple buyers and is not dependent on only a small number of transactions.

Scoring Rationale

The high order count and six-month transaction value support a high score. The rating of 4.5 is solid but not outstanding, which slightly limits the score from reaching the maximum range. The review count is sufficient to provide meaningful commercial validation.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 7 / 10

Basis

• Response time: ≤3h
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
• Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 3 hours indicates a reasonable communication standard for online procurement. This is suitable for buyers who require normal inquiry handling, quotation discussion, order confirmation, and after-sales communication within a practical timeframe.

However, there is no data confirming whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM development, logo customization, packaging customization, private label service, or design modification. Because customization capability is a key part of this scoring dimension, the lack of evidence limits the supplier’s score.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs adequately on response speed, but it does not meet the top-tier service standard of response time within one hour. Additionally, customization capability cannot be confirmed from the provided data. Therefore, the supplier is assessed as having normal service responsiveness but unverified advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 / 10

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 99.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 99.7% is very strong. Based on the scoring standard, suppliers with delivery rates above 90% fall into the highest performance range. A rate close to 100% indicates a strong ability to meet promised shipment timelines on platform-recorded orders.

This delivery performance is especially relevant for buyers sourcing fashion eyewear, where seasonal trends, promotional cycles, and e-commerce replenishment timing may be important. Reliable delivery reduces the risk of stockouts and missed sales windows.

Scoring Rationale

The on-time delivery rate clearly exceeds the 90% benchmark for the highest scoring band. Since the reported figure is 99.7%, the supplier deserves the maximum delivery performance score under the provided evaluation criteria.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 17 / 20

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 300+
• Finished product inspection: Listed
• Factory / supplier verification: True
• Detailed defect rate or third-party quality audit data: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.5 store rating supported by more than 300 reviews, which provides a meaningful customer feedback base. This suggests that the supplier has completed a considerable number of transactions with buyer feedback available. The finished product inspection tag is also a positive quality-control indicator, showing that some level of final goods inspection is represented in the platform data.

The verified supplier status further supports reliability from a procurement perspective. However, the provided data does not include detailed quality inspection procedures, defect rates, product test reports, eyewear safety compliance documents, or third-party quality certifications. Therefore, while the supplier shows good quality-related indicators, the depth of quality assurance information is still limited.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of a solid rating, substantial review count, finished product inspection, and supplier verification supports a good score. The score is not placed in the highest range because the store rating is good rather than excellent, and there is insufficient data on detailed quality systems or independent product compliance documentation.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation

Jieyang City Jiedong Xichang Town Mingao Glasses Factory is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ fashion sunglasses, small-batch purchasing, platform-protected trial orders, and price-sensitive e-commerce inventory. The supplier shows strong commercial activity, reliable delivery performance, Trade Assurance support, and a meaningful customer review base.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium e-commerce sellers
- Buyers testing new sunglasses styles
- Low-MOQ importers or wholesalers
- Procurement teams prioritizing fast delivery and platform transaction protection

Main risks:
- Small factory scale: 520+㎡ and 30+ staff indicate limited production capacity compared with larger factories.
- Customization capability is Insufficient Data. Buyers requiring OEM, ODM, private label, logo, or packaging customization should verify before ordering.
- Product compliance certifications and detailed quality audit reports are Insufficient Data.

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong recent transaction performance and excellent reported delivery reliability. If it can provide clearer customization capability, product compliance documents, and more detailed quality-control evidence, it may become more suitable for larger or brand-oriented buyers.